Blomström P, Edvardsson N, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Olsson S B
Eur Heart J. 1987 May;8(5):510-20. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a062311.
In 34 patients with a left-side anomalous pathway (AP) considered for arrhythmia surgery, the atrial insertion of the anomalous pathway in the preoperative investigation was determined by using three different techniques. The atrial activation sequence during orthodromic tachycardia or ventricular stimulation was recorded in the coronary sinus by using either (a) unipolar leads from an eight-polar electrode catheter with an interelectrode distance of 1 cm, (b) bipolar leads from consecutively positioned pairs of electrodes on the same electrode catheter or (c) bipolar leads recorded at one centimeter intervals by withdrawal of the electrode catheter. The corresponding location at surgery was obtained by atrial epicardial mapping during ventricular stimulation. Each way of recording the atrial activation sequence in the coronary sinus during orthodromic tachycardia or ventricular stimulation was compared with regard to their predictive value in assessing the corresponding location by intraoperative mapping. At surgery, a visual grid system was used to define the anatomical landmarks which were located 20 mm apart. When the unipolar technique was used to assess the anomalous pathway location, there was a difference corresponding to a distance of 2-2.5 anatomical landmarks (48 mm) between the preoperative and intra-operative assessments. With the bipolar technique the difference was up to 3 anatomical landmarks (60 mm) while it was up to 4.5 anatomical landmarks (90 mm) when the withdrawal technique was employed. The unipolar technique was superior in differentiating a left lateral from a left posterior or a septal location.
在34例因心律失常拟行手术的左侧旁路(AP)患者中,术前通过三种不同技术确定旁路的心房插入部位。在顺向性心动过速或心室刺激期间,通过以下方法记录冠状窦内的心房激动顺序:(a)使用电极间距为1 cm的八极电极导管的单极导联;(b)同一电极导管上连续成对电极的双极导联;或(c)通过回撤电极导管以1厘米间隔记录的双极导联。手术时通过心室刺激期间的心外膜标测获得相应位置。比较了在顺向性心动过速或心室刺激期间冠状窦内记录心房激动顺序的每种方法在通过术中标测评估相应位置方面的预测价值。手术时,使用视觉网格系统定义相距20 mm的解剖标志。当使用单极技术评估旁路位置时,术前和术中评估之间的差异相当于2 - 2.5个解剖标志(48 mm)的距离。使用双极技术时,差异可达3个解剖标志(60 mm),而采用回撤技术时差异可达4.5个解剖标志(90 mm)。单极技术在区分左侧壁与左后壁或间隔位置方面更具优势。