• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用老年供体的肝移植受者特征与移植后较差的结果相关。

Liver Transplant Recipient Characteristics Associated With Worse Post-Transplant Outcomes in Using Elderly Donors.

机构信息

Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, United States.

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, United States.

出版信息

Transpl Int. 2022 Aug 25;35:10489. doi: 10.3389/ti.2022.10489. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/ti.2022.10489
PMID:36090776
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9452632/
Abstract

Advanced age of liver donor is a risk factor for graft loss after transplant. We sought to identify recipient characteristics associated with negative post-liver transplant (LT) outcomes in the context of elderly donors. Using 2014-2019 OPTN/UNOS data, LT recipients were classified by donor age: ≥70, 40-69, and <40 years. Recipient risk factors for one-year graft loss were identified and created a risk stratification system and validated it using 2020 OPTN/UNOS data set. At transplant, significant recipient risk factors for one-year graft loss were: previous liver transplant (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 4.37, 95%CI 1.98-9.65); mechanical ventilation (aHR 4.28, 95%CI 1.95-9.43); portal thrombus (aHR 1.87, 95%CI 1.26-2.77); serum sodium <125 mEq/L (aHR 2.88, 95%CI 1.34-6.20); and Karnofsky score 10-30% (aHR 2.03, 95%CI 1.13-3.65), 40-60% (aHR 1.65, 95%CI 1.08-2.51). Using those risk factors and multiplying HRs, recipients were divided into low-risk ( = 931) and high-risk ( = 294). Adjusted risk of one-year graft loss in the low-risk recipient group was similar to that of patients with younger donors; results were consistent using validation dataset. Our results show that a system of careful recipient selection can reduce the risks of graft loss associated with older donor age.

摘要

老年供体是肝移植后移植物丢失的危险因素。我们试图确定在老年供体背景下与肝移植后(LT)不良结局相关的受者特征。使用 2014-2019 年 OPTN/UNOS 数据,根据供体年龄将 LT 受者分为:≥70 岁、40-69 岁和<40 岁。确定了受者发生 1 年移植物丢失的危险因素,并创建了一个风险分层系统,并用 2020 年 OPTN/UNOS 数据集进行了验证。在移植时,1 年移植物丢失的显著受者危险因素包括:既往肝移植(调整后的危险比[aHR]4.37,95%CI 1.98-9.65);机械通气(aHR 4.28,95%CI 1.95-9.43);门静脉血栓形成(aHR 1.87,95%CI 1.26-2.77);血清钠<125 mEq/L(aHR 2.88,95%CI 1.34-6.20);和 Karnofsky 评分 10-30%(aHR 2.03,95%CI 1.13-3.65)、40-60%(aHR 1.65,95%CI 1.08-2.51)。使用这些危险因素和 HR 相乘,将受者分为低危(=931)和高危(=294)。低危受者组 1 年移植物丢失的调整风险与年轻供体患者相似;使用验证数据集的结果一致。我们的研究结果表明,一种仔细选择受者的系统可以降低与老年供体年龄相关的移植物丢失风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7087/9452632/45eef3d63ac5/ti-35-10489-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7087/9452632/ab86388ba470/ti-35-10489-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7087/9452632/89d6ece99c64/ti-35-10489-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7087/9452632/45eef3d63ac5/ti-35-10489-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7087/9452632/ab86388ba470/ti-35-10489-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7087/9452632/89d6ece99c64/ti-35-10489-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7087/9452632/45eef3d63ac5/ti-35-10489-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Liver Transplant Recipient Characteristics Associated With Worse Post-Transplant Outcomes in Using Elderly Donors.使用老年供体的肝移植受者特征与移植后较差的结果相关。
Transpl Int. 2022 Aug 25;35:10489. doi: 10.3389/ti.2022.10489. eCollection 2022.
2
UNOS Liver Registry: ten year survivals.器官共享联合网络肝脏登记处:十年生存率
Clin Transpl. 2006:29-39.
3
Liver transplantation in the United States: a report from the UNOS Liver Transplant Registry.美国的肝移植:器官共享联合网络肝脏移植登记处的一份报告。
Clin Transpl. 1999:23-34.
4
Liver transplantation in the United States: a report from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network.美国的肝脏移植:器官获取与移植网络的一份报告。
Clin Transpl. 2000:19-30.
5
Explainable variation in renal transplant outcomes: a comparison of standard and expanded criteria donors.肾移植结果的可解释变异:标准和扩大标准供体的比较。
Clin Transpl. 2004:303-14.
6
Adult-size kidneys without acute tubular necrosis provide exceedingly superior long-term graft outcomes for infants and small children: a single center and UNOS analysis. United Network for Organ Sharing.无急性肾小管坏死的成人尺寸肾脏为婴幼儿提供了极其优异的长期移植效果:单中心及器官共享联合网络(UNOS)分析。器官共享联合网络
Transplantation. 2000 Dec 27;70(12):1728-36. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200012270-00012.
7
Impact of Combinations of Donor and Recipient Ages and Other Factors on Kidney Graft Outcomes.供者和受者年龄组合及其他因素对肾脏移植物结局的影响。
Front Immunol. 2020 May 22;11:954. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00954. eCollection 2020.
8
Use of Elderly Allografts in Liver Transplantation.老年供肝在肝移植中的应用
Transplantation. 2016 Jan;100(1):153-8. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000806.
9
Similar risk profiles for post-transplant renal dysfunction and long-term graft failure: UNOS/OPTN database analysis.移植后肾功能不全和长期移植失败的相似风险概况:美国器官共享联合网络/器官获取与移植网络数据库分析
Kidney Int. 2004 May;65(5):1906-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00589.x.
10
The prognostic relationship between donor age and infectious risk in liver transplant patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: Analysis of UNOS database.非酒精性脂肪性肝炎肝移植患者中供体年龄与感染风险的预后关系:UNOS 数据库分析。
Dig Liver Dis. 2023 Jun;55(6):751-762. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.01.160. Epub 2023 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Longitudinal Assessment of Performance Status in US Liver Transplantation: National Trends and Survival Implications.美国肝移植中功能状态的纵向评估:全国趋势及生存影响
Transplant Direct. 2025 Jul 24;11(8):e1826. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001826. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Prolonged allograft survival in liver transplantation -time to test the limits…pair with 24-00296.肝脏移植中同种异体移植物的长期存活——是时候挑战极限了……与24-00296配对。
Surg Open Sci. 2025 Apr 22;26:27. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2025.04.001. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Elderly Ages in Liver Transplantation: Are Older Donors Really Higher Risk?

本文引用的文献

1
Extreme hyponatremia as a risk factor for early mortality after liver transplantation in the MELD-sodium era.终末期肝硬化模型-钠评分时代肝移植术后早期死亡的危险因素:严重低钠血症
Transpl Int. 2021 Dec;34(12):2856-2868. doi: 10.1111/tri.14123. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
2
Generation of neutrophil extracellular traps in patients with acute liver failure is associated with poor outcome.急性肝衰竭患者中性粒细胞胞外诱捕网的产生与不良预后相关。
Hepatology. 2022 Mar;75(3):623-633. doi: 10.1002/hep.32174. Epub 2021 Dec 12.
3
Hypothermic Oxygenated Machine Perfusion Reduces Early Allograft Injury and Improves Post-transplant Outcomes in Extended Criteria Donation Liver Transplantation From Donation After Brain Death: Results From a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (HOPE ECD-DBD).
肝移植中的老年受者:老年供者风险真的更高吗?
Transplant Direct. 2025 Apr 9;11(5):e1789. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001789. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Current Understanding of Marginal Grafts in Liver Transplantation.肝移植中边缘供肝的当前认识
Aging Dis. 2024 Feb 14;16(2):1036-1058. doi: 10.14336/AD.2024.0214.
5
Beyond the Concepts of Elder and Marginal in DCD Liver Transplantation: A Prospective Observational Matched-Cohort Study in the Italian Clinical Setting.在 DCD 肝移植中超越老年和边缘供肝的概念:意大利临床环境中的前瞻性观察性匹配队列研究。
Transpl Int. 2023 Sep 7;36:11697. doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.11697. eCollection 2023.
6
Mitochondrial Autophagy in Ischemic Aged Livers.缺血老化肝脏中的线粒体自噬。
Cells. 2022 Dec 16;11(24):4083. doi: 10.3390/cells11244083.
低温氧合机器灌注可减少延长标准供肝来源肝移植术后早期移植物损伤并改善移植结局:来自多中心随机对照试验(HOPE ECD-DBD)的结果。
Ann Surg. 2021 Nov 1;274(5):705-712. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005110.
4
Safe use of livers from deceased donors older than 70 years in recipients with HCV cirrhosis treated with direct-action antivirals. Retrospective cohort study.将直接作用抗病毒药物治疗的 HCV 肝硬化受体使用大于 70 岁的已故供体肝脏的安全使用。回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2021 Jul;91:105981. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105981. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
5
Prognostic role of the Donor Risk Index, the Eurotransplant Donor Risk Index, and the Balance of Risk score on graft loss after liver transplantation.供者风险指数、欧洲肝移植供者风险指数和风险平衡评分对肝移植后移植物丢失的预后作用。
Transpl Int. 2021 May;34(5):778-800. doi: 10.1111/tri.13861. Epub 2021 May 1.
6
OPTN/SRTR 2019 Annual Data Report: Liver.OPTN/SRTR 2019 年度数据报告:肝脏。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Feb;21 Suppl 2:208-315. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16494.
7
Comparable graft survival is achievable with the usage of donation after circulatory death liver grafts from donors at or above 70 years of age: A long-term UK national analysis.在年龄在 70 岁及以上的供体中使用循环死亡后捐献的肝脏进行移植,可以实现可比较的移植物存活率:一项长期的英国国家分析。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Jun;21(6):2200-2210. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16409. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
8
Differential Influence of Donor Age Depending on the Indication for Liver Transplantation-A Collaborative Transplant Study Report.供体年龄对肝移植适应证的影响差异——一项协作移植研究报告。
Transplantation. 2020 Apr;104(4):779-787. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002970.
9
Assessment of Trends in Transplantation of Liver Grafts From Older Donors and Outcomes in Recipients of Liver Grafts From Older Donors, 2003-2016.2003-2016 年老年供者肝移植供肝来源及受体移植结局趋势评估。
JAMA Surg. 2019 May 1;154(5):441-449. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5568.
10
Should All Status 1A Patients Be Prioritized Over High MELD Patients? Concept of Risk Stratification in Extremely Ill Liver Transplant Recipients.所有状态 1A 患者都应优先于高 MELD 患者吗?极危重肝移植受者的风险分层概念。
Transplantation. 2019 Oct;103(10):2121-2129. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002651.