Asmaro Karam, Yoo Frederick, Yassin-Kassab Abdulkader, Bazydlo Michael, Robin Adam M, Rock Jack P, Craig John R
Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
Department of Otolaryngology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, United States.
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021 Dec 17;83(5):476-484. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740622. eCollection 2022 Oct.
Numerous methods have been described to repair nasal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. Most studies have focused on optimizing CSF leak repair success, leading to closure rates of 90 to 95%. This study aimed to determine if excellent reconstruction rates could be achieved without using sinonasal packing. A prospective case series of 73 consecutive patients with various CSF leak etiologies and skull base defects was conducted to evaluate reconstruction success without sinonasal packing. The primary outcome measure was postoperative CSF leak. Secondary outcome measures were postoperative epistaxis requiring intervention in operating room or emergency department, infectious sinusitis, and 22-item sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22) changes. Mean age was 54.5 years and 64% were female. Multilayered reconstructions were performed in 55.3% of cases, with collagen or bone epidural inlay grafts, and nasal mucosal grafts or nasoseptal flaps for onlay layers. Onlay-only reconstructions with mucosal grafts or nasoseptal flaps were performed in 44.7% of cases. Tissue sealants were used in all cases, and lumbar drains were used in 40.8% of cases. There were two initial failures (97.4% initial success), but both resolved with lumbar drains alone (no revision surgeries). There were no instances of postoperative epistaxis requiring intervention in the operating room or emergency department. Infectious sinusitis occurred in 2.7% of patients in the first 3 months postoperatively. SNOT-22 did not change significantly from preoperatively to first postoperative visits, then improved over time. Nasal CSF leaks from various etiologies and defect sites were successfully repaired without using sinonasal packing, and patients experienced minimal sinonasal morbidity.
已有多种修复鼻脑脊液(CSF)漏的方法被描述。大多数研究都集中在优化脑脊液漏修复的成功率上,目前的闭合率可达90%至95%。本研究旨在确定在不使用鼻窦填塞的情况下是否能实现优异的重建率。对73例连续患有各种脑脊液漏病因和颅底缺损的患者进行了前瞻性病例系列研究,以评估不使用鼻窦填塞的重建成功率。主要观察指标为术后脑脊液漏。次要观察指标为术后需要在手术室或急诊科进行干预的鼻出血、感染性鼻窦炎以及22项鼻窦结局测试(SNOT - 22)的变化。平均年龄为54.5岁,64%为女性。55.3%的病例采用了多层重建,使用胶原或骨硬膜内镶嵌移植物,以及鼻黏膜移植物或鼻中隔瓣作为覆盖层。44.7%的病例仅采用黏膜移植物或鼻中隔瓣进行覆盖层重建。所有病例均使用了组织密封剂,40.8%的病例使用了腰大池引流。最初有2例失败(初始成功率为97.4%),但均仅通过腰大池引流得到解决(无需再次手术)。没有出现需要在手术室或急诊科进行干预的术后鼻出血情况。2.7%的患者在术后前3个月发生了感染性鼻窦炎。SNOT - 22从术前到首次术后随访时没有显著变化,随后随时间推移有所改善。各种病因和缺损部位的鼻脑脊液漏在不使用鼻窦填塞的情况下成功修复,患者鼻窦相关的发病率极低。