Suppr超能文献

癌症临床医生如何看待真实世界数据及其从中得出的证据?来自欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织的一项国际调查结果。

How do cancer clinicians perceive real-world data and the evidence derived therefrom? Findings from an international survey of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

作者信息

Saesen Robbe, Kantidakis Georgios, Marinus Ann, Lacombe Denis, Huys Isabelle

机构信息

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium.

Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy Research Unit, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2022 Aug 24;13:969778. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.969778. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

The role of real-world evidence (RWE) in the development of anticancer therapies has been gradually growing over time. Regulators, payers and health technology assessment agencies, spurred by the rise of the precision medicine model, are increasingly incorporating RWE into their decision-making regarding the authorization and reimbursement of novel antineoplastic treatments. However, it remains unclear how this trend is viewed by clinicians in the field. This study aimed to investigate the opinions of these stakeholders with respect to RWE and its suitability for informing regulatory, reimbursement-related and clinical decisions in oncology. An online survey was disseminated to clinicians belonging to the network of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer between May and July 2021. In total, 557 clinicians across 30 different countries participated in the survey, representing 13 distinct cancer domains. Despite seeing the methodological challenges associated with its interpretation as difficult to overcome, the respondents mostly (75.0%) perceived RWE positively, and believed such evidence could be relatively strong, depending on the designs and data sources of the studies from which it is produced. Few (4.6%) saw a future expansion of its influence on decision-makers as a negative evolution. Furthermore, nearly all (94.0%) participants were open to the idea of sharing anonymized or pseudonymized electronic health data of their patients with external parties for research purposes. Nevertheless, most clinicians (77.0%) still considered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to be the gold standard for generating clinical evidence in oncology, and a plurality (49.2%) thought that RWE cannot fully address the knowledge gaps that remain after a new antitumor intervention has entered the market. Moreover, a majority of respondents (50.7%) expressed that they relied more heavily on RCT-derived evidence than on RWE for their own decision-making. While cancer clinicians have positive opinions about RWE and want to contribute to its generation, they also continue to hold RCTs in high regard as sources of actionable evidence.

摘要

随着时间的推移,真实世界证据(RWE)在抗癌疗法研发中的作用日益凸显。在精准医学模式兴起的推动下,监管机构、支付方和卫生技术评估机构越来越多地将RWE纳入其关于新型抗肿瘤治疗药物的授权和报销决策中。然而,该领域的临床医生如何看待这一趋势仍不明确。本研究旨在调查这些利益相关者对RWE的看法,以及RWE在为肿瘤学监管、报销相关和临床决策提供信息方面的适用性。2021年5月至7月,我们向欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织网络中的临床医生开展了一项在线调查。共有来自30个不同国家的557名临床医生参与了此次调查,代表了13个不同的癌症领域。尽管受访者认为与RWE解读相关的方法学挑战难以克服,但大多数人(75.0%)对RWE持积极看法,并认为此类证据可能相对有力,这取决于产生该证据的研究设计和数据来源。很少有人(4.6%)认为RWE未来对决策者影响力的扩大是一种负面演变。此外,几乎所有(94.0%)参与者都愿意为了研究目的与外部机构分享其患者匿名或化名的电子健康数据。尽管如此,大多数临床医生(77.0%)仍认为随机对照试验(RCT)是肿瘤学临床证据生成的金标准,并且多数人(49.2%)认为RWE无法完全填补新的抗肿瘤干预措施进入市场后仍存在的知识空白。此外,大多数受访者(50.7%)表示,在自己的决策过程中,他们更依赖RCT得出的证据而非RWE。虽然癌症临床医生对RWE持积极看法,并希望为其生成做出贡献,但他们仍高度重视RCT作为可操作证据来源的地位。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a42f/9449152/41185ccb5d20/fphar-13-969778-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验