College of Pharmacy, Ajou University, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.
Department of BioHealth Regulatory Science, Graduate School of Ajou University, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Apr;17(4):e13801. doi: 10.1111/cts.13801.
As the importance of utilizing real-world data (RWD)/real-world evidence (RWE) for supporting regulatory scientific decision-making continues to grow, experiences and inputs from experts become crucial for developing a systematic and practice-oriented plan for the use of fit-for-purpose RWD/RWE. This study aimed to survey relevant experts from government agencies, industries, and academia to identify prerequisites for the drug life cycle in Korea. The questionnaire comprised the following: (A) the definition and categories of RWD/RWE, (B) the suitability and feasibility of using RWD/RWE at each authorization stage by the types of RWD, and (C) the challenges and solutions for the use of RWD/RWE. A total of 46 respondents completed the online survey, with 89.1% of them having prior experience with RWD/RWE usage. A majority of respondents agreed that RWD can be obtained from various sources. Among these sources, the registry was the most suitable source. It is suitable to compensate for the limitations of randomized control trials and ensure quality in data collection. Though there was consensus among the respondents for the use of RWD/RWE in post-marketing surveillance, the use of such data in new drug application (NDA) was disagreeable. Respondents considered it necessary to write a protocol in advance for RWD collection and RWE generation, for all RWD types. In conclusion, this study examined the perceptions of experts for RWD/RWE use at each approval stage of drugs. The results suggest that guidelines for the fit-for-purpose use of RWD/RWE should be developed via careful deliberation among experts in the future.
随着利用真实世界数据(RWD)/真实世界证据(RWE)来支持监管科学决策的重要性不断增加,专家的经验和意见对于制定系统的、注重实践的 RWD/RWE 使用计划变得至关重要。本研究旨在调查来自政府机构、行业和学术界的相关专家,以确定韩国药物生命周期的先决条件。问卷包括以下内容:(A)RWD/RWE 的定义和类别,(B)按 RWD 类型划分的每个授权阶段使用 RWD/RWE 的适宜性和可行性,以及(C)使用 RWD/RWE 的挑战和解决方案。共有 46 名受访者完成了在线调查,其中 89.1%的受访者有使用 RWD/RWE 的经验。大多数受访者认为 RWD 可以从各种来源获得。在这些来源中,注册处是最合适的来源。它适合弥补随机对照试验的局限性,并确保数据收集的质量。虽然受访者对在上市后监测中使用 RWD/RWE 达成了共识,但对在新药申请(NDA)中使用此类数据持反对意见。受访者认为,有必要为所有 RWD 类型提前编写 RWD 收集和 RWE 生成的方案。总之,本研究考察了专家对药物各批准阶段 RWD/RWE 使用的看法。研究结果表明,未来应通过专家之间的仔细审议,制定适合目的的 RWD/RWE 使用指南。