• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与、利用与人类颅内电生理学研究

Engagement, Exploitation, and Human Intracranial Electrophysiology Research.

作者信息

Pham Michelle T, Pouratian Nader, Feinsinger Ashley

机构信息

Center for Bioethics and Social Justice, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

Department of Neurological Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

出版信息

Neuroethics. 2022 Oct;15(3). doi: 10.1007/s12152-022-09502-1. Epub 2022 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1007/s12152-022-09502-1
PMID:36092452
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9451055/
Abstract

Motivated by exploitation concerns, we argue for the importance of participant engagement in basic human intracranial electrophysiology research. This research takes advantage of unique neurosurgical opportunities to better understand complex systems of the human brain, but it also exposes participants to additional risks without immediate therapeutic intent. We argue that understanding participant values and incorporating their perspectives into the research process may (i) help determine whether and to what extent research practices and the resulting distributions of risks and benefits constitute exploitation and (ii) contribute to building a brain research paradigm that is genuinely responsive to participant values. More broadly, we highlight the importance of paying attention to participant interests in non-therapeutic brain research.

摘要

出于对剥削问题的关注,我们主张参与者参与人类颅内基础电生理研究的重要性。这项研究利用了独特的神经外科手术机会,以更好地理解人类大脑的复杂系统,但它也使参与者面临额外风险,且没有直接的治疗意图。我们认为,了解参与者的价值观并将他们的观点纳入研究过程可能(i)有助于确定研究实践以及由此产生的风险和利益分配是否构成剥削以及在何种程度上构成剥削,(ii)有助于建立一种真正响应参与者价值观的脑研究范式。更广泛地说,我们强调在非治疗性脑研究中关注参与者利益的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6b1/9451055/61959abd2071/nihms-1833241-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6b1/9451055/61959abd2071/nihms-1833241-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6b1/9451055/61959abd2071/nihms-1833241-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Engagement, Exploitation, and Human Intracranial Electrophysiology Research.参与、利用与人类颅内电生理学研究
Neuroethics. 2022 Oct;15(3). doi: 10.1007/s12152-022-09502-1. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
2
The Cure SMA Clinical Trial Experience Survey: A Study of Trial Participant Perspectives on Clinical Trial Management and Patient-Centric Management Practices.脊髓性肌萎缩症治疗临床试验经验调查:一项关于试验参与者对临床试验管理和以患者为中心管理实践观点的研究。
Neurol Ther. 2022 Sep;11(3):1167-1181. doi: 10.1007/s40120-022-00360-w. Epub 2022 May 30.
3
A Qualitative Analysis of Ethical Perspectives on Recruitment and Consent for Human Intracranial Electrophysiology Studies.人类颅内电生理学研究招募和知情同意的伦理观点定性分析。
AJOB Neurosci. 2021 Jan;12(1):57-67. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2020.1866098.
4
Community perspectives on the extent to which transactional sex is viewed as sexual exploitation in Central Uganda.乌干达中部社区对交易性行为在何种程度上被视为性剥削的看法。
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2020 May 1;20(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12914-020-00228-w.
5
Strategies for research participant engagement: A synthetic review and conceptual framework.研究参与者参与策略:综合回顾与概念框架。
Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;18(4):457-465. doi: 10.1177/17407745211011068. Epub 2021 May 20.
6
Engaged genomic science produces better and fairer outcomes: an engagement framework for engaging and involving participants, patients and publics in genomics research and healthcare implementation.参与式基因组科学能产生更优且更公平的成果:一个关于让参与者、患者和公众参与基因组研究及医疗保健实施的参与框架。
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Nov 15;6:311. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17233.1. eCollection 2021.
7
Exploitation and community engagement: can community advisory boards successfully assume a role minimising exploitation in international research?剥削与社区参与:社区咨询委员会能否成功发挥作用,将国际研究中的剥削降至最低?
Dev World Bioeth. 2015 Apr;15(1):18-26. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12031. Epub 2013 May 31.
8
Community engagement and ethical global health research.社区参与和符合伦理的全球健康研究。
Glob Bioeth. 2019 Dec 20;31(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2019.1703504. eCollection 2020.
9
Community engagement and the human infrastructure of global health research.社区参与与全球卫生研究的人力基础架构
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Dec 13;15:84. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-84.
10
Opportunities and challenges of current electrophysiology research: a plea to establish 'translational electrophysiology' curricula.当前电生理学研究的机遇与挑战:呼吁建立“转化电生理学”课程
Europace. 2015 May;17(5):825-33. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu301. Epub 2015 Feb 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical Issues in Intraoperative Neuroscience Research: Assessing Subjects' Recall of Informed Consent and Motivations for Participation.术中神经科学研究中的伦理问题:评估受试者对知情同意的回忆和参与动机。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2022 Jan-Mar;13(1):57-66. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2021.1941415. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
2
Electrocorticography During Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: Safety Experience From 4 Centers Within the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Research Opportunities in Human Consortium.深部脑刺激术中的皮层脑电图监测:国立神经病学与卒中研究所人类研究机会联合体 4 个中心的安全性经验。
Neurosurgery. 2021 Apr 15;88(5):E420-E426. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa592.
3
Getting into Their Heads: When the Investigator is also the Treating Physician.
深入他们的头脑:当研究者也是治疗医生时。
AJOB Neurosci. 2021 Jan;12(1):68-70. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2020.1866103.
4
The Value of Patient Perspectives in an Ethical Analysis of Recruitment and Consent for Intracranial Electrophysiology Research.患者观点在颅内电生理研究招募与同意伦理分析中的价值
AJOB Neurosci. 2021 Jan;12(1):75-77. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2020.1866114.
5
A Qualitative Analysis of Ethical Perspectives on Recruitment and Consent for Human Intracranial Electrophysiology Studies.人类颅内电生理学研究招募和知情同意的伦理观点定性分析。
AJOB Neurosci. 2021 Jan;12(1):57-67. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2020.1866098.
6
Distinct roles of dorsal and ventral subthalamic neurons in action selection and cancellation.背侧和腹侧丘脑底核神经元在动作选择和取消中的不同作用。
Neuron. 2021 Mar 3;109(5):869-881.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.12.025. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
7
The BRAIN Initiative and Neuroethics: Enabling and Enhancing Neuroscience Advances for Society.脑计划与神经伦理学:为社会的神经科学进步提供支持和增强。
AJOB Neurosci. 2020 Jul-Sep;11(3):135-139. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2020.1778121.
8
Defining Patient Engagement in Research: Results of a Systematic Review and Analysis: Report of the ISPOR Patient-Centered Special Interest Group.定义研究中的患者参与:系统评价和分析的结果:ISPOR 以患者为中心的特别兴趣小组的报告。
Value Health. 2020 Jun;23(6):677-688. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.01.019. Epub 2020 May 23.
9
What is it like to use a BCI? - insights from an interview study with brain-computer interface users.使用脑机接口是一种什么样的体验?——基于脑机接口使用者访谈研究的洞察。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Jan 6;21(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0442-2.
10
Ethical Challenges of Risk, Informed Consent, and Posttrial Responsibilities in Human Research With Neural Devices: A Review.神经装置人体研究中风险、知情同意和试验后责任的伦理挑战:综述
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Dec 1;76(12):1506-1514. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.3523.