Naidoo Vaneshveri, Stewart Aimée V, Maleka Morake E D
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
S Afr J Physiother. 2022 Aug 31;78(1):1759. doi: 10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1759. eCollection 2022.
Physiotherapy clinical education is complex. The dynamic learning milieu is fluid and multidimensional, which contributes to the complexity of the clinical learning experience. Consequently, there are numerous factors which impact the clinical learning experience which cannot be measured objectively - a gap which led to the development of our study.
To develop, validate, and test the reliability of an assessment tool that evaluates the effectiveness and quality of physiotherapy clinical education programmes.
A mixed methods approach in three phases included physiotherapy academics, clinical educators, and clinicians throughout South Africa. Phase One was a qualitative study: focus group discussions determined items and domains of the tool. Phase Two established the content and construct validity of the tool, a scoring system and a name for the tool, using the Delphi method. In Phase Three, factor analysis reduced the number of items, and the feasibility and utility of the tool was determined cross-sectionally.
The Vaneshveri Naidoo Clinical Programme Evaluation Tool (VN-CPET) of 58 items and six domains was developed and found to be valid, reliable (α = 0.75) and useful. The six domains of VN-CPET include governance; academic processes; learning exposure; clinical orientation; clinical supervision and quality assurance and monitoring and evaluation.
The Vaneshveri Naidoo Clinical Programme Evaluation Tool is a valid, reliable and standardised tool, that evaluates the quality and effectiveness of physiotherapy clinical education programmes.
This tool can objectively evaluate the quality and effectiveness of physiotherapy clinical education programmes in South Africa, and other health science education programmes, both locally and globally, with minor modification.
物理治疗临床教育很复杂。动态的学习环境是流动且多维度的,这导致了临床学习体验的复杂性。因此,有许多影响临床学习体验的因素无法客观衡量——这一差距促使我们开展了这项研究。
开发、验证并测试一种评估工具的可靠性,该工具用于评估物理治疗临床教育项目的有效性和质量。
采用三阶段混合方法,涉及南非各地的物理治疗学者、临床教育工作者和临床医生。第一阶段是定性研究:焦点小组讨论确定了该工具的项目和领域。第二阶段使用德尔菲法确定了该工具的内容和结构效度、评分系统以及工具名称。在第三阶段,因子分析减少了项目数量,并横断面确定了该工具的可行性和实用性。
开发了包含58个项目和六个领域的瓦内什韦里·奈杜临床项目评估工具(VN-CPET),发现该工具有效、可靠(α = 0.75)且有用。VN-CPET的六个领域包括治理;学术过程;学习接触;临床导向;临床监督与质量保证以及监测与评估。
瓦内什韦里·奈杜临床项目评估工具是一种有效、可靠且标准化的工具,用于评估物理治疗临床教育项目的质量和有效性。
该工具可以客观评估南非物理治疗临床教育项目以及其他健康科学教育项目在本地和全球的质量和有效性,只需稍作修改。