Department of Mental Health and Addiction, ASST Monza, Monza (MB), Italy.
Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Monza (MB), Italy.
Psychol Health Med. 2023 Jun;28(5):1298-1308. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2022.2121971. Epub 2022 Sep 11.
COVID-19 pandemic had a great impact on mental health, both in the general population and psychiatric patients. Little is known about the difference between these two populations in perceiving the pandemic as a traumatic event. The aim of the study was to compare psychiatric patients and healthy controls (HC) in terms of change over time of post-traumatic (PTSD) symptoms. Demographic and clinical variables were collected. Impact of Event Scale Revised (IES-R) scores were registered at T1 as lockdown period (March-April 2020) and T2 as restarting (May-June 2020). Descriptive analyses and linear regression models were performed. A total of 166 outpatients and 57 HC were recruited. Time (F = 15.76; p < 0.001) and diagnosis (F = 4.94; p < 0.001) had a significant effect on the change of IES-R scores, which resulted T1 > T2 (p < 0.001), except for subjects affected by Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). Overall, IES-R scores were < in patients than in HC (p = 0.02), particularly in the schizophrenia (SKZ) subgroup (p < 0.001). IES-R scores of subjects with personality disorders (PDs) resulted to be > HC, although not statistically significant. The lockdown period was perceived as more traumatic than the reopening phase by both groups, with the exception of OCD patients, probably because of the clinical worsening associated with the urge of control against risks of contamination. Overall, HC reported more PTSD symptoms than psychiatric patients did, particularly SKZ ones. PD patients, in contrast, may be more vulnerable to PTSD symptoms probably as a result of poor coping skills. Together with OCD patients, subjects with PDs may need closer monitoring during the different phases of the pandemic. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04694482.
COVID-19 大流行对心理健康产生了重大影响,无论是在普通人群还是精神科患者中。人们对这两个群体在将大流行视为创伤性事件方面的差异知之甚少。本研究的目的是比较精神科患者和健康对照组 (HC) 在创伤后 (PTSD) 症状随时间变化方面的差异。收集了人口统计学和临床变量。在 T1(封锁期,2020 年 3 月至 4 月)和 T2(重启期,2020 年 5 月至 6 月)时登记了事件影响量表修订版 (IES-R) 的评分。进行了描述性分析和线性回归模型。共招募了 166 名门诊患者和 57 名 HC。时间 (F=15.76;p<0.001) 和诊断 (F=4.94;p<0.001) 对 IES-R 评分的变化有显著影响,结果 T1>T2(p<0.001),除强迫症 (OCD) 患者外。总体而言,患者的 IES-R 评分低于 HC(p=0.02),尤其是精神分裂症 (SKZ) 亚组(p<0.001)。尽管没有统计学意义,但人格障碍 (PD) 患者的 IES-R 评分高于 HC。两组患者均认为封锁期比重新开放阶段更具创伤性,除 OCD 患者外,这可能是由于与控制对污染风险的冲动相关的临床恶化所致。总体而言,HC 报告的 PTSD 症状多于精神科患者,尤其是 SKZ 患者。相比之下,PD 患者可能更容易受到 PTSD 症状的影响,这可能是由于应对技能较差所致。与 OCD 患者一样,PD 患者在大流行的不同阶段可能需要更密切的监测。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT04694482。