Jerajani Kaushal, Wan Ying, Kumru Ozan S, Pullagurla Swathi R, Kumar Prashant, Sharma Nitya, Ogun Oluwadara, Mapari Shweta, Brendle Sarah, Christensen Neil D, Batwal Saurabh, Mahedvi Mustafa, Rao Harish, Dogar Vikas, Chandrasekharan Rahul, Shaligram Umesh, Joshi Sangeeta B, Volkin David B
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Vaccine Analytics and Formulation Center, University of Kansas, 2030 Becker Drive, Lawrence, Kansas 66047, USA.
Department of Pathology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, USA.
J Pharm Sci. 2023 Feb;112(2):446-457. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2022.09.001. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
The development of multi-dose, subunit vaccine formulations can be challenging since antimicrobial preservatives (APs) often destabilize protein antigens. In this work, we evaluated Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Virus-Like Particles (VLPs) to determine if combining different APs used in approved parenteral products, each at lower concentrations than used alone, would maintain both antimicrobial effectiveness and antigen stability. To identify promising AP combinations, two different screening strategies were utilized: (1) empirical one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) and (2) statistical design-of-experiments (DOE). Seven different APs were employed to screen for two- and three-AP combinations using high-throughput methods for antimicrobial effectiveness (i.e., microbial growth inhibition assay and a modified European Pharmacopeia method) and antigen stability (i.e., serotype-specific mAb binding to conformational epitopes of HPV6, 11, 16 VLPs by ELISA). The OFAT and DOE approaches were complementary, such that initial OFAT results (and associated lessons learned) were subsequently employed to optimize the combinations using DOE. Additional validation experiments confirmed the final selection of top AP-combinations predicted by DOE modeling. Overall, 20 candidate multi-dose formulations containing two- or three-AP combinations were down-selected. As described in Part 2 (companion paper), long-term storage stability profiles of aluminum-adjuvanted, quadrivalent HPV VLP formulations containing these lead candidate AP combinations are compared to single APs.
多剂量亚单位疫苗制剂的研发可能具有挑战性,因为抗菌防腐剂(APs)常常会使蛋白质抗原不稳定。在本研究中,我们评估了人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)病毒样颗粒(VLPs),以确定将已批准的肠胃外产品中使用的不同APs组合起来(每种APs的浓度均低于单独使用时的浓度)是否既能保持抗菌效果又能维持抗原稳定性。为了确定有前景的AP组合,我们采用了两种不同的筛选策略:(1)经验性的一次单因素(OFAT)法和(2)统计实验设计(DOE)法。我们使用了七种不同的APs,通过高通量方法筛选二联和三联AP组合,以检测抗菌效果(即微生物生长抑制试验和改良的欧洲药典方法)和抗原稳定性(即通过酶联免疫吸附测定法检测血清型特异性单克隆抗体与HPV6、11、16 VLPs构象表位的结合情况)。OFAT法和DOE法是互补的,因此最初的OFAT结果(以及从中吸取的相关经验教训)随后被用于利用DOE法优化组合。额外的验证实验证实了DOE模型预测的最佳AP组合的最终选择。总体而言,我们筛选出了20种含有二联或三联AP组合的候选多剂量制剂。如第2部分(配套论文)所述,将含有这些主要候选AP组合的铝佐剂四价HPV VLP制剂的长期储存稳定性概况与单一APs进行了比较。