NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom; Department of Infection, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Department of Infection, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
J Infect. 2022 Dec;85(6):625-633. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.09.003. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
Effective treatment of pneumonia requires timely administration of appropriate antimicrobials but standard diagnostic tests take around 48 h to generate results. Highly accurate, rapid molecular tests have been developed for identifying organisms in lower respiratory tract samples, however their impact on antibiotic use is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of syndromic molecular point-of-care testing compared to conventional diagnostic testing, on antibiotic use.
In this pragmatic, randomised controlled trial, we enrolled critically ill adults with pneumonia. Patients were assigned (1:1) to molecular testing of samples at the point-of-care or routine clinical care. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who received results-directed antimicrobial therapy.
200 patients were randomly assigned to point-of-care testing (n = 100) or the control group (n = 100). 85 patients had community acquired pneumonia (42 in the mPOCT group and 43 in the control group), 69 hospital acquired pneumonia (30 in mPOCT and 39 in control) and 46 ventilator associated pneumonia (28 in mPOCT and 18 in control). The median [IQR] time to results was 1.7 [1.6-1.9] hours for point-of-care testing and 66.7 [56.7-88.5] hours for standard diagnostics (difference of -65.0 h, 95%CI -68.0 to -62.0; p < 0.0001). 71 (71%) patients in the point-of-care testing arm had pathogens detected compared to 51 (51%) in the control arm (difference of 20%, 95%CI 7 to 33; p = 0.004). 80 (80%) of patients in the point-of-care group received results-directed therapy, compared with 29 (29%) of 99 in the control group (difference of 51%, 95%CI 39-63; p < 0.0001). Time to results-directed therapy was 2.3 [1.8-7.2] hours in the mPOCT group and 46.1 [23.0-51.5] hours in the control group (difference of -43.8 h, 95% CI -48.9 to -38.6; p < 0.0001). 42 (42%) patients in mPOCT group had antibiotics de-escalated compared with 8 (8%) of 98 in the control group (difference of 34%, 95%CI 23-45; p < 0.0001). Time to de-escalation was 4.8 [2.4-13.0] hours in the mPOCT group compared with 46.5 [26.3-48.6] hours in the control group (difference of -41.4 h, 95%CI -53 to -29.7; p < 0.0001). There was no major difference in antibiotic duration or in clinical or safety outcomes between the two groups.
Use of molecular point-of-care testing in patients with pneumonia returned results more rapidly and identified more pathogens than conventional testing. This was associated with improvements in appropriate antimicrobial use and appeared safe.
有效治疗肺炎需要及时使用适当的抗生素,但标准诊断测试需要大约 48 小时才能得出结果。已经开发出高度准确、快速的分子测试来识别下呼吸道样本中的病原体,但它们对抗生素使用的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估与常规诊断测试相比,综合征分子即时检测对抗生素使用的影响。
在这项实用、随机对照试验中,我们招募了患有肺炎的重症成年人。患者被(1:1)随机分配到即时护理点进行分子检测或常规临床护理。主要结局是接受结果导向的抗菌治疗的患者比例。
200 名患者被随机分配到即时护理检测组(n=100)或对照组(n=100)。85 名患者患有社区获得性肺炎(即时护理组 42 名,对照组 43 名),69 名医院获得性肺炎(即时护理组 30 名,对照组 39 名)和 46 名呼吸机相关性肺炎(即时护理组 28 名,对照组 18 名)。即时护理检测的中位数[IQR]结果时间为 1.7 [1.6-1.9] 小时,标准诊断为 66.7 [56.7-88.5] 小时(差异-65.0 小时,95%CI-68.0 至-62.0;p<0.0001)。即时护理臂中有 71(71%)名患者检测到病原体,而对照组有 51(51%)名患者(差异 20%,95%CI 7 至 33;p=0.004)。即时护理组 80(80%)名患者接受了结果导向的治疗,而对照组 99 名患者中有 29(29%)名(差异 51%,95%CI 39-63;p<0.0001)。接受结果导向治疗的时间在即时护理组为 2.3 [1.8-7.2] 小时,在对照组为 46.1 [23.0-51.5] 小时(差异-43.8 小时,95%CI-48.9 至-38.6;p<0.0001)。即时护理组有 42(42%)名患者抗生素降级,而对照组有 8(8%)名患者(差异 34%,95%CI 23-45;p<0.0001)。降级的时间在即时护理组为 4.8 [2.4-13.0] 小时,在对照组为 46.5 [26.3-48.6] 小时(差异-41.4 小时,95%CI-53 至-29.7;p<0.0001)。两组之间的抗生素持续时间或临床或安全性结果没有明显差异。
在患有肺炎的患者中使用分子即时护理检测比常规检测更快地获得结果并识别出更多的病原体。这与适当的抗菌药物使用的改善有关,而且似乎是安全的。