Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia
School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
J Neurosci. 2022 Oct 5;42(40):7648-7658. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2223-21.2022. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
Humans routinely learn the value of actions by updating their expectations based on past outcomes - a process driven by reward prediction errors (RPEs). Importantly, however, implementing a course of action also requires the investment of effort. Recent work has revealed a close link between the neural signals involved in effort exertion and those underpinning reward-based learning, but the behavioral relationship between these two functions remains unclear. Across two experiments, we tested healthy male and female human participants ( = 140) on a reinforcement learning task in which they registered their responses by applying physical force to a pair of hand-held dynamometers. We examined the effect of effort on learning by systematically manipulating the amount of force required to register a response during the task. Our key finding, replicated across both experiments, was that greater effort increased learning rates following positive outcomes and decreased them following negative outcomes, which corresponded to a differential effect of effort in boosting positive RPEs and blunting negative RPEs. Interestingly, this effect was most pronounced in individuals who were more averse to effort in the first place, raising the possibility that the investment of effort may have an adaptive effect on learning in those less motivated to exert it. By integrating principles of reinforcement learning with neuroeconomic approaches to value-based decision-making, we show that the very act of investing effort modulates one's capacity to learn, and demonstrate how these functions may operate within a common computational framework. Recent work suggests that learning and effort may share common neurophysiological substrates. This raises the possibility that the very act of investing effort influences learning. Here, we tested whether effort modulates teaching signals in a reinforcement learning paradigm. Our results showed that effort resulted in more efficient learning from positive outcomes and less efficient learning from negative outcomes. Interestingly, this effect varied across individuals, and was more pronounced in those who were more averse to investing effort in the first place. These data highlight the importance of motivational factors in a common framework of reward-based learning, which integrates the computational principles of reinforcement learning with those of value-based decision-making.
人类通常通过基于过去结果更新期望来学习行动的价值——这一过程是由奖励预测误差(RPE)驱动的。然而,重要的是,实施行动还需要投入努力。最近的工作揭示了涉及努力付出的神经信号与支持基于奖励的学习的神经信号之间的密切联系,但这两种功能之间的行为关系尚不清楚。在两项实验中,我们在一项强化学习任务中对健康的男性和女性人类参与者(n=140)进行了测试,他们通过对手持测力计施加物理力来记录自己的反应。我们通过系统地改变任务中记录反应所需的力的大小来检查努力对学习的影响。我们的关键发现是,在两个实验中都得到了复制,即更大的努力会增加积极结果后的学习率,并降低消极结果后的学习率,这对应于努力对增强积极 RPE 和削弱消极 RPE 的不同影响。有趣的是,这种影响在那些本来就更不愿意努力的个体中最为明显,这表明在那些不太愿意付出努力的个体中,付出努力可能对学习有适应性影响。通过将强化学习的原则与基于价值的决策的神经经济学方法相结合,我们表明投入努力的行为会调节一个人学习的能力,并展示了这些功能如何在一个共同的计算框架内运作。最近的工作表明,学习和努力可能共享共同的神经生理基础。这就提出了一种可能性,即努力本身会影响学习。在这里,我们在强化学习范式中测试了努力是否调节了教学信号。我们的结果表明,努力会导致从积极结果中更有效地学习,从消极结果中更有效地学习。有趣的是,这种效应因人而异,在那些本来就更不愿意投入努力的个体中更为明显。这些数据突出了动机因素在基于奖励的学习的共同框架中的重要性,该框架将强化学习的计算原则与基于价值的决策的原则结合起来。