• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内在动机和能力相关因素在基于认知努力的决策中的作用。

The roles of intrinsic motivation and capability-related factors in cognitive effort-based decision-making.

作者信息

Randez Alyssa, Hélie Sébastien

机构信息

CCN Lab, Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 May 2;15:1303262. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1303262. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1303262
PMID:38756501
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11098016/
Abstract

Individual differences in cognitive effort-based decision-making can be used to reveal human motivations to invest effort into a given task. Preferences among options that differ by dimensions related to demand levels (i.e., the interaction of task characteristics and performance measures) are also heavily influenced by how likely a person can succeed at a given option. However, most existing cognitive effort-based research has focused primarily on demand-related factors, leading to confounding inferences about the motivation behind these choices. This study used an adaptive algorithm to adjust relative demand levels for three cognitive tasks to investigate general and individual differences in demand preferences. The results highlight an overall pattern of individual differences in intrinsic motivation to perform challenging tasks, supporting research that found cognitive effort aversive to some but attractive to others. These results suggest that relative demand levels and intrinsic task factors drive the motivation to select an action.

摘要

基于认知努力的决策中的个体差异可用于揭示人类为特定任务投入努力的动机。在因与需求水平相关的维度（即任务特征与绩效指标的相互作用）而有所不同的选项之间的偏好，也会受到一个人在给定选项上取得成功的可能性的严重影响。然而，大多数现有的基于认知努力的研究主要集中在与需求相关的因素上，导致对这些选择背后动机的推断产生混淆。本研究使用一种自适应算法来调整三项认知任务的相对需求水平，以调查需求偏好方面的一般差异和个体差异。结果突出了在执行具有挑战性任务的内在动机方面个体差异的总体模式，支持了那些发现认知努力对一些人来说是厌恶的而对另一些人来说是有吸引力的研究。这些结果表明，相对需求水平和内在任务因素驱动了选择行动的动机。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2486/11098016/186aec4dd8f1/fpsyg-15-1303262-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2486/11098016/3cc95664c4c2/fpsyg-15-1303262-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2486/11098016/072bd85de9ec/fpsyg-15-1303262-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2486/11098016/60ec33d747df/fpsyg-15-1303262-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2486/11098016/5d2f1957ea5d/fpsyg-15-1303262-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2486/11098016/db72dceedc87/fpsyg-15-1303262-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2486/11098016/e6818e1836bc/fpsyg-15-1303262-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2486/11098016/186aec4dd8f1/fpsyg-15-1303262-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2486/11098016/3cc95664c4c2/fpsyg-15-1303262-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2486/11098016/072bd85de9ec/fpsyg-15-1303262-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2486/11098016/60ec33d747df/fpsyg-15-1303262-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2486/11098016/5d2f1957ea5d/fpsyg-15-1303262-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2486/11098016/db72dceedc87/fpsyg-15-1303262-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2486/11098016/e6818e1836bc/fpsyg-15-1303262-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2486/11098016/186aec4dd8f1/fpsyg-15-1303262-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
The roles of intrinsic motivation and capability-related factors in cognitive effort-based decision-making.内在动机和能力相关因素在基于认知努力的决策中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 May 2;15:1303262. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1303262. eCollection 2024.
2
Dopamine restores cognitive motivation in Parkinson's disease.多巴胺可恢复帕金森病患者的认知动机。
Brain. 2019 Mar 1;142(3):719-732. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy341.
3
Rewarding cognitive effort increases the intrinsic value of mental labor.奖励认知努力会增加脑力劳动的内在价值。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Feb 1;119(5). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2111785119.
4
Cognitive effort-based decision-making in major depressive disorder.重度抑郁症的基于认知努力的决策。
Psychol Med. 2023 Jul;53(9):4228-4235. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722000964. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
5
Sleep Restriction Reduces Cognitive but Not Physical Motivation.睡眠限制会降低认知动力，但不会降低身体动力。
Nat Sci Sleep. 2022 Nov 4;14:2001-2012. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S368335. eCollection 2022.
6
Learning progress mediates the link between cognitive effort and task engagement.学习进展在认知努力和任务参与之间的联系中起中介作用。
Cognition. 2023 Jul;236:105418. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105418. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
7
Dopaminergic medication increases motivation to exert cognitive control by reducing subjective effort costs in Parkinson's patients.多巴胺能药物通过降低帕金森病患者的主观努力成本来增加执行认知控制的动机。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2022 Sep;193:107652. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2022.107652. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
8
Losses Motivate Cognitive Effort More Than Gains in Effort-Based Decision Making and Performance.在基于努力的决策和表现中，损失比收益更能激发认知努力。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Jul 17;14:287. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00287. eCollection 2020.
9
Effort-Based Decision Making: A Novel Approach for Assessing Motivation in Schizophrenia.基于努力的决策制定：一种评估精神分裂症动机的新方法。
Schizophr Bull. 2015 Sep;41(5):1035-44. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv071. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
10
Dispositional individual differences in cognitive effort investment: establishing the core construct.认知努力投入的性格个体差异：确立核心建构。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Jan 22;9(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00512-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Unraveling the influence of task designs and intrinsic motivation in effort-based decision-making.探究任务设计和内在动机在基于努力的决策中的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Jul 8. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01745-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Effort Reinforces Learning.努力强化学习。
J Neurosci. 2022 Oct 5;42(40):7648-7658. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2223-21.2022. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
2
Perceptual decision confidence is sensitive to forgone physical effort expenditure.感知决策信心对放弃的体力支出敏感。
Cognition. 2021 Feb;207:104525. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104525. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
3
PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy.心理物理学 2 版：简单易用的行为实验。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):195-203. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y.
4
Interactions of Motivation and Cognitive Control.动机与认知控制的相互作用
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2018 Feb;19:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.11.009. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
5
The opportunity cost of time modulates cognitive effort.时间的机会成本调节认知努力。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Feb 4;123:92-105. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.05.006. Epub 2018 May 8.
6
Cognitive capacity limitations and Need for Cognition differentially predict reward-induced cognitive effort expenditure.认知能力限制和认知需求不同地预测奖励诱导的认知努力支出。
Cognition. 2018 Mar;172:101-106. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
7
Learning the value of information and reward over time when solving exploration-exploitation problems.随着时间的推移，在解决探索-开发问题时学习信息和奖励的价值。
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 5;7(1):16919. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17237-w.
8
The roles of valuation and reward processing in cognitive function and psychiatric disorders.评估与奖赏处理在认知功能和精神疾病中的作用。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017 May;1395(1):33-48. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13327. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
9
Toward a Rational and Mechanistic Account of Mental Effort.迈向对心理努力的理性与机械论解释
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2017 Jul 25;40:99-124. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031526. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
10
Social psychology. Just think: the challenges of the disengaged mind.社会心理学。想想看：心不在焉的挑战。
Science. 2014 Jul 4;345(6192):75-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1250830.