Department of Ultrasound, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Department of Ultrasound, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2022 Dec;48(12):2442-2448. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.06.023. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
We evaluated the significance of the ultrasound (US) markers shear wave dispersion slope (SWDS) and shear wave velocity (SWV) for identification of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and high-risk NASH; the latter was defined as the presence of steatohepatitis, a non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) ≥4 or a fibrosis stage ≥2. Thirty-six male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were assigned to two groups: the study (n = 30) and control (n = 6) groups. To initiate non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, study group rats were fed a diet deficient in methionine and choline. All rats were examined using ultrasonography to obtain the SWDS and SWV parameters of the liver at the same time points. Fatty liver pathological grades were determined after euthanasia; the livers were categorized in the normal (n = 6), NAFL (non-alcoholic fatty liver) (n = 10) and NASH (n = 20) subgroups based on the NAS scoring system. They were also categorized into subgroups F0 (n = 22), F1 (n = 3), F2 (n = 7) and F3 (n = 4) on the basis of the METAVIR (Meta-analysis of Histological Data in Viral Hepatitis) scoring system. Measurement differences between various grades were evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) or the Mann-Whitney U-test. We used logistic regression to calculate a combination of the two parameters for combined assessment of parameters. The diagnostic value of SWDS, SWV and the two-variable model was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. This analysis revealed stepwise increases in SWDS and SWV with increasing NAFLD severity. The accuracy of SWDS in diagnosing NASH was good (area under the ROC curve [AUC]: 0.88) and was superior to that of SWV (AUC: 0.76). The combination of SWV and SWDS exhibited higher performance (AUC: 0.90). SWV was higher than SWDS in participants with a fibrosis grade ≥2 (high-risk NASH). For identification of high-risk NASH, SWV exhibited the best diagnostic performance (AUC: 0.89), which was equivalent to that of the two-variable model (AUC: 0.88) and slightly higher than that of SWDS (AUC: 0.85). This study indicates that of the US-based markers, SWDS outperforms SWV in identifying NASH in rats and that combining the two markers may increase their clinical utility in guiding NAFLD and NASH treatment.
我们评估了超声(US)标志物剪切波弥散斜率(SWDS)和剪切波速度(SWV)对非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)和高危 NASH 的识别意义;后者定义为存在脂肪性肝炎、非酒精性脂肪性肝病活动评分(NAS)≥4 或纤维化分期≥2。36 只雄性 Sprague-Dawley(SD)大鼠分为两组:研究组(n=30)和对照组(n=6)。为了诱发非酒精性脂肪性肝炎,研究组大鼠给予缺乏蛋氨酸和胆碱的饮食。所有大鼠同时进行超声检查以获得肝脏的 SWDS 和 SWV 参数。安乐死后确定脂肪肝病理分级;根据 NAS 评分系统,肝脏分为正常(n=6)、非酒精性脂肪肝(NAFL)(n=10)和 NASH(n=20)亚组。根据 METAVIR(病毒性肝炎组织学数据的荟萃分析)评分系统,它们还分为 F0(n=22)、F1(n=3)、F2(n=7)和 F3(n=4)亚组。通过方差分析(ANOVA)或曼-惠特尼 U 检验评估不同等级之间的测量差异。我们使用逻辑回归计算两个参数的组合,用于联合评估参数。通过接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定 SWDS、SWV 和双变量模型的诊断价值。该分析显示,随着 NAFLD 严重程度的增加,SWDS 和 SWV 逐渐增加。SWDS 诊断 NASH 的准确性良好(ROC 曲线下面积[AUC]:0.88),优于 SWV(AUC:0.76)。SWV 和 SWDS 的组合表现出更高的性能(AUC:0.90)。纤维化程度≥2(高危 NASH)的患者中,SWV 高于 SWDS。对于高危 NASH 的识别,SWV 表现出最佳的诊断性能(AUC:0.89),与双变量模型(AUC:0.88)相当,略高于 SWDS(AUC:0.85)。本研究表明,在基于 US 的标志物中,SWDS 在识别大鼠 NASH 方面优于 SWV,并且联合使用两种标志物可能会增加它们在指导 NAFLD 和 NASH 治疗中的临床实用性。