Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL.
University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, IL.
Surgery. 2022 Dec;172(6):1823-1828. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.07.020. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
Published studies examining the efficacy of liver transplantation in patients presenting with hepatocellular cancer beyond the traditional Milan criteria for liver transplantation have primarily been single institution series with limited ability to compare outcomes to alternative methods of management.
We queried the National Cancer Database to identify patients presenting between 2004 and 2016 with histologically confirmed clinical stage III and IVA hepatocellular cancer. Multivariable regression was used to identify factors associated with liver transplantation. Patients undergoing liver transplantation were 1:1 propensity score-matched for age, demographics, comorbid disease, clinical stage, and histologic resection margin to those undergoing surgical resection. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare overall survival profiles for matched cohorts.
Seven hundred and ninety-two patients met inclusion criteria-590 (74.5%) underwent surgical resection and 202 (25.5%) liver transplantation. On adjusted analysis, patients undergoing liver transplantation were less likely to have advanced age (>60 years; odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval [0.21-0.71]) and to be of Black race (odds ratio 0.42, 95% confidence interval [0.23-0.73]) or Asian (odds ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval [0.11-0.53]) ethnicity but were more likely to have advanced (Charlson score >2) comorbidity scores, (odds ratio 2.48, 95% confidence interval [1.58-3.90]) and more likely to have private health insurance (odds ratio 4.17, 95% confidence interval [1.31-18.66]) than those undergoing surgical resection. On Kaplan-Meier analysis of matched cohorts, patients undergoing liver transplantation demonstrated significantly better rates of 5-year overall survival (65.3% vs 26.3%, P < .0001) and longer median overall survival times than those undergoing resection (53.1 ± 2.78 vs 26.9 ± 1.20 months, P < .0001).
Liver transplantation offers the potential to be an effective treatment modality in select patients presenting with stage III and IVA hepatocellular cancer.
研究肝细胞癌(HCC)超出米兰标准的患者接受肝移植疗效的已发表研究主要为单中心系列研究,其比较肝移植与其他治疗方法的结局的能力有限。
我们通过国家癌症数据库(National Cancer Database),确定了 2004 年至 2016 年间组织学确诊为临床 III 期和 IVA 期 HCC 的患者。采用多变量回归确定与肝移植相关的因素。将肝移植患者与接受手术切除的患者按年龄、人口统计学特征、合并症、临床分期和组织学切缘进行 1:1 倾向评分匹配。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法比较匹配队列的总生存率。
792 例患者符合纳入标准,其中 590 例(74.5%)接受手术切除,202 例(25.5%)接受肝移植。在调整后的分析中,接受肝移植的患者年龄较大(>60 岁)的可能性较低(优势比 0.39,95%置信区间[0.21-0.71]),且黑种人(优势比 0.42,95%置信区间[0.23-0.73])或亚洲人(优势比 0.25,95%置信区间[0.11-0.53])的可能性较低,但是合并症评分较高(Charlson 评分>2)(优势比 2.48,95%置信区间[1.58-3.90])和更有可能拥有私人医疗保险(优势比 4.17,95%置信区间[1.31-18.66])的可能性较高。在匹配队列的 Kaplan-Meier 分析中,接受肝移植的患者 5 年总生存率显著更高(65.3% vs 26.3%,P<.0001),中位总生存时间更长(53.1 ± 2.78 个月 vs 26.9 ± 1.20 个月,P<.0001)。
在特定的 III 期和 IVA 期 HCC 患者中,肝移植可能是一种有效的治疗方式。