• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高度近视伴高度散光患者行 SMILE 和 FS-LASIK 术后的功能性光学区比较

Comparison of the Functional Optical Zone in Eyes With High Myopia With High Astigmatism After SMILE and FS-LASIK.

出版信息

J Refract Surg. 2022 Sep;38(9):595-601. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20220725-01. Epub 2022 Sep 1.

DOI:10.3928/1081597X-20220725-01
PMID:36098388
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the functional optical zone (FOZ) in eyes with high myopia with high astigmatism after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).

METHODS

In total, 45 eyes of 45 patients with high myopia with astigmatism greater than 2.00 diopters (D) who underwent SMILE or FS-LASIK were enrolled. The FOZ, optical zone decentration, and corneal aberrations were analyzed using Scheimpflug imaging. These values were then compared between the two groups 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

No postoperative complications were observed during follow-up. The mean FOZ diameter was 5.03 ± 0.31 mm for the FS-LASIK group and 5.24 ± 0.27 mm for the SMILE group ( = .007), corresponding to reductions of 1.18 ± 0.23 and 1.01 ± 0.21 mm, respectively, compared with the programmed optical zone (POZ) ( = .013). A significant difference was noted in the FOZ on the short axis between the two groups ( = .002), whereas no significant difference was observed on the long axis ( = .088). The FOZ area in the FS-LASIK and SMILE groups was 65.39 ± 6.14% and 70.09 ± 5.46% of the POZ area, respectively ( = .010). There was no significant difference in decentration between the two groups (0.29 ± 0.13 mm for the FS-LASIK group vs 0.30 ± 0.13 mm for the SMILE group, = .798). A significant increase in spherical aberration was observed in the FS-LASIK group ( < .001). However, the induction of vertical coma was higher in the SMILE group than in the FS-LASIK group ( = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Eyes with high myopia with high astigmatism following SMILE achieved a larger FOZ and less spherical aberration but a larger vertical coma introduction than following FS-LASIK. .

摘要

目的

比较小切口透镜切除术(SMILE)和飞秒激光辅助准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)治疗高度近视合并高度散光患者术后的功能光学区(FOZ)。

方法

共纳入 45 例(45 只眼)高度近视合并散光大于 2.00 屈光度(D)患者,分别行 SMILE 或 FS-LASIK 手术。应用 Scheimpflug 成像分析 FOZ、光学区离焦和角膜像差。术后 6 个月比较两组患者上述指标。

结果

随访期间未观察到术后并发症。FS-LASIK 组的平均 FOZ 直径为 5.03 ± 0.31mm,SMILE 组为 5.24 ± 0.27mm( =.007),与计划光学区(POZ)相比,分别减少了 1.18 ± 0.23mm 和 1.01 ± 0.21mm( =.013)。两组 FOZ 短轴之间存在显著差异( =.002),而长轴之间无显著差异( =.088)。FS-LASIK 组和 SMILE 组的 FOZ 面积分别为 POZ 面积的 65.39 ± 6.14%和 70.09 ± 5.46%( =.010)。两组离焦无显著差异(FS-LASIK 组 0.29 ± 0.13mm,SMILE 组 0.30 ± 0.13mm, =.798)。FS-LASIK 组的球差显著增加( <.001)。然而,SMILE 组的垂直彗差诱导量高于 FS-LASIK 组( =.002)。

结论

SMILE 治疗高度近视合并高度散光可获得更大的 FOZ 和更小的球差,但诱导的垂直彗差大于 FS-LASIK。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Functional Optical Zone in Eyes With High Myopia With High Astigmatism After SMILE and FS-LASIK.高度近视伴高度散光患者行 SMILE 和 FS-LASIK 术后的功能性光学区比较
J Refract Surg. 2022 Sep;38(9):595-601. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20220725-01. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
2
Comparison of efficacy and visual outcomes after SMILE and FS-LASIK for the correction of high myopia with the sum of myopia and astigmatism from -10.00 to -14.00 dioptres.SMILE 和 FS-LASIK 治疗等效球镜度数-10.00 至-14.00 度近视合并散光的疗效和视觉效果比较。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar;98(2):e161-e172. doi: 10.1111/aos.14078. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
3
Prospective, Randomized, Contralateral Eye Comparison of Functional Optical Zone, and Visual Quality After SMILE and FS-LASIK for High Myopia.高度近视 SMILE 和 FS-LASIK 术后功能性光区和视觉质量的前瞻性、随机、对侧眼对照研究。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022 Feb 1;11(2):13. doi: 10.1167/tvst.11.2.13.
4
Effective Optical Zone and Centration Following SMILE and FS-LASIK for High Myopia Calculated With a Novel Method.采用新方法计算高度近视的 SMILE 和 FS-LASIK 术后的有效光学区和中心定位。
J Refract Surg. 2023 Nov;39(11):736-740. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20230822-01. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
5
Aberration compensation between anterior and posterior corneal surfaces after Small incision lenticule extraction and Femtosecond laser-assisted laser in-situ keratomileusis.小切口透镜切除术和飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术后角膜前后表面像差补偿
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2015 Sep;35(5):540-51. doi: 10.1111/opo.12226. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
6
Clinical Outcomes After SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.全飞秒激光微小切口基质透镜切除术和飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视及近视散光的临床疗效:一项前瞻性随机对照研究
Cornea. 2016 Feb;35(2):210-6. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000707.
7
[Comparison of the visual quality at 1 year following femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK, wavefront-guided femtosecond LASIK and small incision lenticule extraction for myopia and astigmatism].[飞秒激光辅助准分子原位角膜磨镶术、波前引导飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术和小切口基质透镜切除术治疗近视及散光后1年视觉质量的比较]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Feb 11;56(2):118-125. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2020.02.007.
8
Three-year outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for myopia and myopic astigmatism.小切口微透镜取出术(SMILE)和飞秒激光辅助准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)治疗近视和近视散光的 3 年疗效。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr;103(4):565-568. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312140. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
9
Functional Optical Zone and Centration Following SMILE and LASIK: A Prospective, Randomized, Contralateral Eye Study.飞秒激光小切口基质透镜切除术和准分子原位角膜磨镶术后的功能性光学区和中心定位:一项前瞻性、随机、对侧眼研究。
J Refract Surg. 2019 Apr 1;35(4):230-237. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190313-01.
10
Comparative Study of Primary SMILE, SMILE Enhancement, and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK on Higher Order Aberrations and Corneal Densitometry.原发性 SMILE、SMILE 增强术与飞秒激光辅助 LASIK 对高阶像差和角膜密度测量的对比研究。
J Refract Surg. 2024 May;40(5):e291-e303. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20240314-01. Epub 2024 May 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Mesopic binocular contrast sensitivity under glare conditions after myopic corneal laser refractive surgery.近视角膜激光屈光手术后眩光条件下的中间视觉双眼对比敏感度
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 28. doi: 10.1007/s00417-025-06882-x.
2
Evaluating the Impact of Angle Kappa on Effective Optical Zone in Kerato-Lenticule Extraction (KLEx) Surgery with Intraoperative Angle Kappa Adjustment.评估术中调整角kappa对角巩膜透镜切除术(KLEx)中有效光学区的影响。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Apr 28;19:1417-1426. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S517130. eCollection 2025.
3
Ten-year evaluation on efficacy, safety, and predictability of femtosecond laser corneal small incision lenticule extraction for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: a case series.
飞秒激光角膜基质透镜切除术矫正近视和近视散光的疗效、安全性及可预测性的十年评估:病例系列研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Sep 30;86(11):6761-6765. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002549. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Comparison of long-term changes in the effective optical zone following SMILE and FS-LASIK for moderate and high myopia.SMILE 和 FS-LASIK 治疗中高度近视术后有效光学区长期变化的比较。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 3;24(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03662-9.
5
Ten-year observation of corneal densitometry and associated factors following small incision lenticule extraction.小切口透镜切除术角膜密度测定及其相关因素的十年观察
Int J Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar 18;17(3):485-490. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2024.03.10. eCollection 2024.
6
Correlational Analysis of the Effective Optical Zone with Myopia, Myopic Astigmatism, and Spherical Equivalent in LASIK, PRK, and SMILE.LASIK、PRK和SMILE手术中有效光学区与近视、近视散光及等效球镜度的相关性分析
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Feb 5;18:377-392. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S440608. eCollection 2024.
7
Effective optical zone following small incision lenticule extraction: a review.小切口微透镜取出术后的有效光区:综述。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Jun;262(6):1657-1665. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06263-2. Epub 2023 Oct 18.