• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺体积对前列腺癌筛查中临床参数的影响。

The influence of prostate volume on clinical parameters in prostate cancer screening.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Suzhou Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Suzhou, China.

Department of Urology, Lu'an Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Lu'an, China.

出版信息

J Clin Lab Anal. 2022 Oct;36(10):e24700. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24700. Epub 2022 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1002/jcla.24700
PMID:36098911
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9551122/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic significance of two new and a few clinical markers for prostate cancer (PCa) at various prostate volumes (PV).

METHODS

The study subjects were divided into two groups. Among them, there were 70 cases in the PV ≤30 ml group (benign prostatic hyperplasia [BPH]: 32 cases, PCa: 38 cases) and 372 cases in the PV > 30 ml group (BPH: 277 cases, PCa: 95 cases). SPSS 26.0 and GraphPad Prism 8.0 were used to construct their receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for diagnosing PCa and calculating their area under the ROC curve (AUC).

RESULTS

In the PV ≤30 ml group, the diagnostic parameters based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) had a decreased diagnostic significance for PCa. In the PV > 30 ml group, PSAD (AUC = 0.709), AVR (AVR = Age/PV, AUC = 0.742), and A-PSAD (A-PSAD = Age×PSA/PV, AUC = 0.736) exhibited moderate diagnostic significance for PCa, which was better than PSA-AV (AUC = 0.672), free PSA (FPSA, AUC = 0.509), total PSA (TPSA, AUC = 0.563), (F/T) PSA (AUC = 0.540), and (F/T)/PSAD (AUC = 0.663). Compared with AVR, A-PSAD exhibited similar diagnostic significance for PCa, but higher than PSA density (PSAD).

CONCLUSIONS

Choosing appropriate indicators for different PVs could contribute to the early screening and diagnosis of PCa. The difference in the diagnostic value of two new indicators (A-PSAD and AVR), and PSAD for PCa may require further validation by increasing the sample size.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估两种新的和几种临床标志物在不同前列腺体积(PV)下对前列腺癌(PCa)的诊断意义。

方法

研究对象分为两组。其中,PV≤30ml 组 70 例(良性前列腺增生[BPH]:32 例,PCa:38 例),PV>30ml 组 372 例(BPH:277 例,PCa:95 例)。采用 SPSS 26.0 和 GraphPad Prism 8.0 构建受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,用于诊断 PCa,并计算 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)。

结果

在 PV≤30ml 组中,基于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)的诊断参数对 PCa 的诊断意义降低。在 PV>30ml 组中,PSAD(AUC=0.709)、AVR(AVR=Age/PV,AUC=0.742)和 A-PSAD(A-PSAD=Age×PSA/PV,AUC=0.736)对 PCa 具有中等诊断意义,优于 PSA-AV(AUC=0.672)、游离前列腺特异性抗原(FPSA,AUC=0.509)、总前列腺特异性抗原(TPSA,AUC=0.563)、(F/T)PSA(AUC=0.540)和(F/T)/PSAD(AUC=0.663)。与 AVR 相比,A-PSAD 对 PCa 的诊断意义相似,但高于 PSAD。

结论

选择不同 PV 下的合适指标有助于 PCa 的早期筛查和诊断。两种新指标(A-PSAD 和 AVR)和 PSAD 对 PCa 的诊断价值的差异可能需要通过增加样本量进一步验证。

相似文献

1
The influence of prostate volume on clinical parameters in prostate cancer screening.前列腺体积对前列腺癌筛查中临床参数的影响。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2022 Oct;36(10):e24700. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24700. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
2
The influence of age on prostate cancer screening index.年龄对前列腺癌筛查指数的影响。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2022 Jan;36(1):e24098. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24098. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
3
Value of serum free prostate-specific antigen density in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.血清游离前列腺特异性抗原密度在前列腺癌诊断中的价值。
Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Dec;192(6):2681-2687. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03448-w. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
4
Potential diagnostic value of multiple indicators combined with total prostate-specific antigen in prostate cancer.多种指标联合总前列腺特异性抗原对前列腺癌的潜在诊断价值。
J Int Med Res. 2023 Oct;51(10):3000605231204429. doi: 10.1177/03000605231204429.
5
Significant Diagnostic Value of Free-Serum PSA (FPSA)/Prostate-Specific Antigen Density (PSAD) and (F/T)/PSAD for Prostate Cancer of the Chinese Population in a Single Institution.游离血清前列腺特异抗原(FPSA)/前列腺特异抗原密度(PSAD)及(F/T)/PSAD对单机构中国人群前列腺癌的显著诊断价值
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Nov 6;25:8345-8351. doi: 10.12659/MSM.916900.
6
Clinical research analysis based on prostate cancer screening diagnosis.基于前列腺癌筛查诊断的临床研究分析。
Andrologia. 2022 May;54(4):e14371. doi: 10.1111/and.14371. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
7
The ratio of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to prostate volume (PSA density) as a parameter to improve the detection of prostate carcinoma in PSA values in the range of < 4 ng/mL.前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)与前列腺体积之比(PSA密度)作为一项参数,用于提高对PSA值在<4 ng/mL范围内前列腺癌的检测。
Cancer. 2005 Sep 1;104(5):993-1003. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21267.
8
Significance of the prostate central gland and total gland volume ratio in the diagnosis of prostate cancer patients in the prostate specific antigen grey zone.前列腺中央腺体与总体腺体体积比值在 PSA 灰区前列腺癌患者诊断中的意义。
J Int Med Res. 2021 Jul;49(7):3000605211019879. doi: 10.1177/03000605211019879.
9
[Comparison of PSAD and PSAD-TZ value in prostatic hyperplasia and prostatic cancer].前列腺增生与前列腺癌中前列腺特异抗原密度(PSAD)及前列腺特异抗原密度-移行带值(PSAD-TZ)的比较
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2002 Dec;8(6):411-3.
10
The value of adjusted PSAD in prostate cancer detection in the Chinese population.校正后前列腺特异抗原密度(PSAD)在中国人群前列腺癌检测中的价值。
Front Oncol. 2024 Oct 2;14:1462997. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1462997. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of prostate volume on the predictive value of prostate-specific antigen density for prostate cancer.前列腺体积对前列腺特异性抗原密度预测前列腺癌的价值的影响。
Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Jan 31;14(1):70-80. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-490. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
2
Potential diagnostic value of multiple indicators combined with total prostate-specific antigen in prostate cancer.多种指标联合总前列腺特异性抗原对前列腺癌的潜在诊断价值。
J Int Med Res. 2023 Oct;51(10):3000605231204429. doi: 10.1177/03000605231204429.

本文引用的文献

1
[China guideline for the screening and early detection of prostate cancer (2022, Beijing)].[中国前列腺癌筛查与早诊指南(2022年版,北京)]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2022 Jan 23;44(1):29-53. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20211226-00975.
2
Clinical research analysis based on prostate cancer screening diagnosis.基于前列腺癌筛查诊断的临床研究分析。
Andrologia. 2022 May;54(4):e14371. doi: 10.1111/and.14371. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
3
The influence of age on prostate cancer screening index.年龄对前列腺癌筛查指数的影响。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2022 Jan;36(1):e24098. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24098. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
4
[Relationship of prostate volume and inflammatory cell infiltration with the positive rate of prostate biopsy].前列腺体积及炎性细胞浸润与前列腺穿刺活检阳性率的关系
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2020 May;26(5):409-413.
5
EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG 前列腺癌指南-2020 版更新。第 1 部分:筛查、诊断和以治愈为目的的局部治疗。
Eur Urol. 2021 Feb;79(2):243-262. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
6
Prostate cancer in Pennsylvania: The role of older age at diagnosis, aggressiveness, and environmental risk factors on treatment and mortality using data from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry.宾夕法尼亚州的前列腺癌:使用宾夕法尼亚癌症登记处的数据,探讨诊断时年龄较大、侵袭性和环境风险因素对治疗和死亡率的影响。
Cancer Med. 2020 May;9(10):3623-3633. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3003. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
7
Significant Diagnostic Value of Free-Serum PSA (FPSA)/Prostate-Specific Antigen Density (PSAD) and (F/T)/PSAD for Prostate Cancer of the Chinese Population in a Single Institution.游离血清前列腺特异抗原(FPSA)/前列腺特异抗原密度(PSAD)及(F/T)/PSAD对单机构中国人群前列腺癌的显著诊断价值
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Nov 6;25:8345-8351. doi: 10.12659/MSM.916900.
8
Current cancer situation in China: good or bad news from the 2018 Global Cancer Statistics?中国当前癌症形势:2018 年全球癌症统计数据带来的是好消息还是坏消息?
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2019 Apr 29;39(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40880-019-0368-6.
9
Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Transperineal Template Prostate Mapping Biopsies in the PICTURE Study.患者报告的经会阴模板前列腺图谱活检的结局测量指标。在 PICTURE 研究中。
J Urol. 2018 Dec;200(6):1235-1240. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.06.033. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
10
Evaluation of PSA-age volume score in predicting prostate cancer in Chinese population.评价 PSA-age 体积评分在中国人群中预测前列腺癌的价值。
Asian J Androl. 2018 Jul-Aug;20(4):324-329. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_81_17.