• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用机器学习为2型糖尿病患者优化健康指导:模型开发与验证研究

Optimizing Health Coaching for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using Machine Learning: Model Development and Validation Study.

作者信息

Di Shuang, Petch Jeremy, Gerstein Hertzel C, Zhu Ruoqing, Sherifali Diana

机构信息

Centre for Data Science and Digital Health, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2022 Sep 13;6(9):e37838. doi: 10.2196/37838.

DOI:10.2196/37838
PMID:36099006
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9516374/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health coaching is an emerging intervention that has been shown to improve clinical and patient-relevant outcomes for type 2 diabetes. Advances in artificial intelligence may provide an avenue for developing a more personalized, adaptive, and cost-effective approach to diabetes health coaching.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to apply Q-learning, a widely used reinforcement learning algorithm, to a diabetes health-coaching data set to develop a model for recommending an optimal coaching intervention at each decision point that is tailored to a patient's accumulated history.

METHODS

In this pilot study, we fit a two-stage reinforcement learning model on 177 patients from the intervention arm of a community-based randomized controlled trial conducted in Canada. The policy produced by the reinforcement learning model can recommend a coaching intervention at each decision point that is tailored to a patient's accumulated history and is expected to maximize the composite clinical outcome of hemoglobin A reduction and quality of life improvement (normalized to [ ​0, 1 ​], with a higher score being better). Our data, models, and source code are publicly available.

RESULTS

Among the 177 patients, the coaching intervention recommended by our policy mirrored the observed diabetes health coach's interventions in 17.5% (n=31) of the patients in stage 1 and 14.1% (n=25) of the patients in stage 2. Where there was agreement in both stages, the average cumulative composite outcome (0.839, 95% CI 0.460-1.220) was better than those for whom the optimal policy agreed with the diabetes health coach in only one stage (0.791, 95% CI 0.747-0.836) or differed in both stages (0.755, 95% CI 0.728-0.781). Additionally, the average cumulative composite outcome predicted for the policy's recommendations was significantly better than that of the observed diabetes health coach's recommendations (t=10.040; P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Applying reinforcement learning to diabetes health coaching could allow for both the automation of health coaching and an improvement in health outcomes produced by this type of intervention.

摘要

背景

健康指导是一种新兴的干预措施,已被证明可改善2型糖尿病的临床及与患者相关的结局。人工智能的进展可能为开发更个性化、适应性更强且成本效益更高的糖尿病健康指导方法提供一条途径。

目的

我们旨在将一种广泛使用的强化学习算法——Q学习应用于糖尿病健康指导数据集,以开发一个模型,用于在每个决策点推荐针对患者累积病史量身定制的最佳指导干预措施。

方法

在这项试点研究中,我们对来自加拿大一项基于社区的随机对照试验干预组的177名患者拟合了一个两阶段强化学习模型。强化学习模型产生的策略可以在每个决策点推荐针对患者累积病史量身定制的指导干预措施,并有望使血红蛋白A降低和生活质量改善的综合临床结局最大化(归一化为[0, 1],分数越高越好)。我们的数据、模型和源代码均可公开获取。

结果

在这177名患者中,我们的策略推荐的指导干预措施与观察到的糖尿病健康指导师在第1阶段17.5%(n = 31)的患者和第2阶段14.1%(n = 25)的患者中的干预措施一致。在两个阶段都达成一致的情况下,平均累积综合结局(0.839,95%置信区间0.460 - 1.220)优于那些最佳策略仅在一个阶段与糖尿病健康指导师一致的患者(0.791,95%置信区间0.747 - 0.836)或在两个阶段都不同的患者(0.755,95%置信区间0.728 - 0.781)。此外,该策略推荐所预测的平均累积综合结局显著优于观察到的糖尿病健康指导师的推荐(t = 10.040;P <.001)。

结论

将强化学习应用于糖尿病健康指导可以实现健康指导的自动化,并改善这类干预措施所产生的健康结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd18/9516374/371c2a5642d9/formative_v6i9e37838_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd18/9516374/205e4acc8b13/formative_v6i9e37838_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd18/9516374/371c2a5642d9/formative_v6i9e37838_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd18/9516374/205e4acc8b13/formative_v6i9e37838_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd18/9516374/371c2a5642d9/formative_v6i9e37838_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimizing Health Coaching for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using Machine Learning: Model Development and Validation Study.使用机器学习为2型糖尿病患者优化健康指导:模型开发与验证研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Sep 13;6(9):e37838. doi: 10.2196/37838.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Health Coaching Reduces HbA1c in Type 2 Diabetic Patients From a Lower-Socioeconomic Status Community: A Randomized Controlled Trial.健康指导降低了来自低社会经济地位社区的2型糖尿病患者的糖化血红蛋白水平:一项随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Oct 5;17(10):e224. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4871.
4
Economic Analysis of a Diabetes Health Coaching Intervention for Adults Living With Type 2 Diabetes: A Single-Centre Evaluation From a Community-Based Randomized Controlled Trial.糖尿病健康教练干预对 2 型糖尿病患者的经济学评价:一项基于社区的随机对照试验的单中心评估。
Can J Diabetes. 2022 Mar;46(2):165-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
5
Long-term Weight Loss in a Primary Care-Anchored eHealth Lifestyle Coaching Program: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于初级保健的电子健康生活方式教练计划的长期减肥效果:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 23;24(9):e39741. doi: 10.2196/39741.
6
Diabetes health coach in individuals with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta analysis of quadruple aim outcomes.2 型糖尿病患者的糖尿病健康教练:四重目标结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Dec 16;13:1069401. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1069401. eCollection 2022.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
A Complex mHealth Coaching Intervention to Prevent Overweight, Obesity, and Diabetes in High-Risk Women in Antenatal Care: Protocol for a Hybrid Type 2 Effectiveness-Implementation Study.一项用于预防产前保健高危女性超重、肥胖和糖尿病的复杂移动健康指导干预措施:一项混合型2期有效性-实施性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Sep 18;12:e51431. doi: 10.2196/51431.
9
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Effectiveness of artificial intelligence vs. human coaching in diabetes prevention: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.人工智能与人工教练在糖尿病预防中的效果比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 May 16;25(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08177-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Economic Analysis of a Diabetes Health Coaching Intervention for Adults Living With Type 2 Diabetes: A Single-Centre Evaluation From a Community-Based Randomized Controlled Trial.糖尿病健康教练干预对 2 型糖尿病患者的经济学评价:一项基于社区的随机对照试验的单中心评估。
Can J Diabetes. 2022 Mar;46(2):165-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
2
REinforcement learning to improve non-adherence for diabetes treatments by Optimising Response and Customising Engagement (REINFORCE): study protocol of a pragmatic randomised trial.通过优化反应和定制参与度来改善糖尿病治疗不依从性的强化学习(REINFORCE):一项实用随机试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 3;11(12):e052091. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052091.
3
Reinforcement learning for intelligent healthcare applications: A survey.
强化学习在智能医疗保健应用中的研究进展:综述
Artif Intell Med. 2020 Sep;109:101964. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101964. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
4
Opening the Black Box: The Promise and Limitations of Explainable Machine Learning in Cardiology.揭开黑箱:可解释机器学习在心脏病学中的前景与局限。
Can J Cardiol. 2022 Feb;38(2):204-213. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.09.004. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
5
Effective Treatment Recommendations for Type 2 Diabetes Management Using Reinforcement Learning: Treatment Recommendation Model Development and Validation.使用强化学习进行2型糖尿病管理的有效治疗建议:治疗建议模型的开发与验证
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 22;23(7):e27858. doi: 10.2196/27858.
6
Effect of Diabetes Health Coaching on Glycemic Control and Quality of Life in Adults Living With Type 2 Diabetes: A Community-Based, Randomized, Controlled Trial.基于社区的 2 型糖尿病患者糖尿病健康教练对血糖控制和生活质量影响的随机对照试验
Can J Diabetes. 2021 Oct;45(7):594-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2020.11.012. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
7
Expanding Implementation Research to Prevent Chronic Diseases in Community Settings.扩大实施研究以预防社区环境中的慢性病。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;42:135-158. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102547. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
8
The Lancet Commission on diabetes: using data to transform diabetes care and patient lives.《柳叶刀》糖尿病委员会:利用数据变革糖尿病护理与患者生活。
Lancet. 2021 Dec 19;396(10267):2019-2082. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32374-6. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
9
Reinforcement learning application in diabetes blood glucose control: A systematic review.强化学习在糖尿病血糖控制中的应用:一项系统综述。
Artif Intell Med. 2020 Apr;104:101836. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101836. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
10
Control of Blood Glucose for Type-1 Diabetes by Using Reinforcement Learning with Feedforward Algorithm.基于前馈算法的强化学习对1型糖尿病患者血糖的控制
Comput Math Methods Med. 2018 Dec 30;2018:4091497. doi: 10.1155/2018/4091497. eCollection 2018.