Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, The University of Tennessee, 605 Airways Boulevard, Jackson, TN 38301, USA.
Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
J Econ Entomol. 2022 Oct 12;115(5):1693-1702. doi: 10.1093/jee/toac136.
Foliar-applied insecticide treatments may be necessary to manage thrips in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under severe infestations or when at-planting insecticide seed treatments do not provide satisfactory protection. The most common foliar-applied insecticide is acephate. Field observations in Tennessee suggest that the performance of acephate has declined. Thus, the first objective was to perform leaf-dip bioassays to assess if tobacco thrips, Frankliniella fusca (Hinds) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), in cotton production regions have evolved resistance to foliar-applied insecticides. A second objective was to assess the performance of commonly applied foliar insecticides for managing thrips in standardized field trials in Arkansas, Tennessee, Mississippi, and Texas. For both objectives, several insecticides were evaluated including acephate, dicrotophos, dimethoate, lambda-cyhalothrin, imidacloprid, and spinetoram. Field trials and bioassays were completed from 2018 to 2021. Dose-response bioassays with acephate were performed on tobacco thrips field populations and a susceptible laboratory population. Bioassay results suggest that tobacco thrips have developed resistance to acephate and other organophosphate insecticides; however, this resistance seems to be most severe in Arkansas, Tennessee, and the Delta region of Mississippi. Resistance to other classes of insecticides were perhaps even more evident in these bioassays. The performance of these insecticides in field trials was variable, with tobacco thrips only showing consistent signs of resistance to lambda-cyhalothrin. However, it is evident that many populations of tobacco thrips are resistant to multiple classes of insecticides. Further research is needed to determine heritability and resistance mechanism(s).
叶面施药可能是在严重虫害发生或定植期施药未能提供满意保护的情况下防治棉花(Gossypium hirsutum L.)蓟马的必要手段。最常用的叶面施药杀虫剂是乙酰甲胺磷。田纳西州的田间观察表明,乙酰甲胺磷的药效已经下降。因此,第一个目标是进行叶浸生物测定,以评估棉花生产区的烟蓟马(Frankliniella fusca (Hinds))(缨翅目:蓟马科)是否已经对叶面施用药剂产生了抗性。第二个目标是在阿肯色州、田纳西州、密西西比州和德克萨斯州的标准化田间试验中评估常用的叶面杀虫剂防治蓟马的效果。在这两个目标中,评估了几种杀虫剂,包括乙酰甲胺磷、敌百虫、乐果、高效氯氟氰菊酯、吡虫啉和螺虫乙酯。田间试验和生物测定于 2018 年至 2021 年完成。在烟蓟马田间种群和敏感的实验室种群上进行了乙酰甲胺磷剂量反应生物测定。生物测定结果表明,烟蓟马对乙酰甲胺磷和其他有机磷杀虫剂产生了抗性;然而,这种抗性在阿肯色州、田纳西州和密西西比三角洲地区似乎最为严重。在这些生物测定中,对其他类别的杀虫剂的抗性可能更为明显。这些杀虫剂在田间试验中的效果是可变的,只有烟蓟马对高效氯氟氰菊酯表现出一致的抗性迹象。然而,显然许多烟蓟马种群对多种类别的杀虫剂都有抗性。需要进一步研究来确定其遗传力和抗性机制。