• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较窒息和死因不明:州儿童死亡审查计划中与睡眠相关的婴儿死亡病例回顾性队列分析。

Comparing asphyxia and unexplained causes of death: a retrospective cohort analysis of sleep-related infant death cases from a state child fatality review programme.

机构信息

Division of Children's Medical Services, Florida Department of Health, Tallahassee, Florida, USA

Independent Statistical Consultant, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 14;12(9):e059745. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059745.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059745
PMID:36104144
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9476159/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the characteristics and circumstances of infants who died while sleeping or in a sleep environment and compare deaths classified as either unintentional asphyxia or an unexplained cause.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Data were extracted from the National Fatality Review Case Reporting System and Florida Vital Statistics databases.

PARTICIPANTS

Data on 778 sleep-related infant deaths occurring from 2014 to 2018 in Florida were analysed.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

Cause of death classification as unintentional asphyxia or unexplained.

RESULTS

Overall, 36% (n=276) of sleep-related infant deaths in this study sample were classified as resulting from an unexplained cause compared with unintentional asphyxia. Most infants were reported to be in an adult bed (60%; n=464) and sharing a sleep surface with a person or animal (60%; n=468); less than half (44%; n=343) were reportedly placed to sleep on their back. After controlling for the influence of other independent variables, female sex (adjusted risk ratio: 1.36; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.74) and fully obstructed airway condition (adjusted risk ratio: 0.30; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.50) were associated with an unexplained cause of death.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this analysis indicate that sleep environment hazards remain prevalent among infants who die suddenly and unexpectedly, regardless of the cause of death determination. While significant differences were observed for some factors, in many others the distributions of both demographic and incident characteristics were similar between unexplained deaths and those resulting from asphyxia. The results of this study support growing evidence that unsafe sleep environments contribute to all forms of sudden unexpected infant death, underscoring the need for standardising cause of death determination practices and promoting consistent, high-quality forensic investigations to accurately explain, monitor and prevent these deaths.

摘要

目的

研究在睡眠或睡眠环境中死亡的婴儿的特征和情况,并比较归类为意外窒息或不明原因的死亡。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

数据取自国家死亡审查案例报告系统和佛罗里达州生命统计数据库。

参与者

分析了 2014 年至 2018 年期间佛罗里达州发生的 778 例与睡眠相关的婴儿死亡数据。

主要观察指标

死亡原因分类为意外窒息或不明原因。

结果

总体而言,本研究样本中 36%(n=276)的与睡眠相关的婴儿死亡被归类为不明原因导致,而非意外窒息。大多数婴儿被报告睡在成人床上(60%;n=464),与他人或动物睡在同一张床上(60%;n=468);不到一半(44%;n=343)被报告以仰卧姿势入睡。在控制其他独立变量的影响后,女性(调整风险比:1.36;95%CI 1.06 至 1.74)和完全阻塞气道状态(调整风险比:0.30;95%CI 0.18 至 0.50)与不明原因死亡相关。

结论

该分析结果表明,无论死因确定如何,睡眠环境危害仍然普遍存在于突然和意外死亡的婴儿中。虽然某些因素存在显著差异,但在许多其他因素中,不明原因死亡和窒息导致的死亡在人口统计学和事件特征方面的分布相似。本研究结果支持越来越多的证据表明,不安全的睡眠环境会导致所有形式的婴儿突然意外死亡,强调需要规范死因确定做法,并促进一致、高质量的法医调查,以准确解释、监测和预防这些死亡。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20bf/9476159/615ba75c11ef/bmjopen-2021-059745f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20bf/9476159/615ba75c11ef/bmjopen-2021-059745f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20bf/9476159/615ba75c11ef/bmjopen-2021-059745f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing asphyxia and unexplained causes of death: a retrospective cohort analysis of sleep-related infant death cases from a state child fatality review programme.比较窒息和死因不明:州儿童死亡审查计划中与睡眠相关的婴儿死亡病例回顾性队列分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 14;12(9):e059745. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059745.
2
Sudden unexpected infant deaths: sleep environment and circumstances.婴儿猝死:睡眠环境与情况。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Jun;102(6):1204-12. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300613. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
3
Unintentional asphyxia, SIDS, and medically explained deaths: a descriptive study of outcomes of child death review (CDR) investigations following sudden unexpected death in infancy.意外窒息、婴儿猝死综合征及医学解释性死亡:一项关于婴儿意外猝死儿童死亡审查(CDR)调查结果的描述性研究。
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2016 Dec;12(4):407-415. doi: 10.1007/s12024-016-9802-0. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
4
Potential asphyxia and brainstem abnormalities in sudden and unexpected death in infants.婴儿猝死中潜在的窒息和脑干异常。
Pediatrics. 2013 Dec;132(6):e1616-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-0700. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
5
Unsafe sleep practices and an analysis of bedsharing among infants dying suddenly and unexpectedly: results of a four-year, population-based, death-scene investigation study of sudden infant death syndrome and related deaths.不安全睡眠习惯与意外猝死婴儿的同床睡眠分析:一项针对婴儿猝死综合征及相关死亡的为期四年的基于人群的死亡现场调查研究结果
Pediatrics. 2000 Sep;106(3):E41. doi: 10.1542/peds.106.3.e41.
6
Characteristics of Infant Deaths during Sleep While Under Nonparental Supervision.非父母监督下婴儿睡眠中死亡的特征。
J Pediatr. 2018 Jun;197:57-62.e36. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.01.051. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
7
Comprehensive review of sleep-related sudden unexpected infant deaths and their investigations: Florida 2008.2008年佛罗里达州与睡眠相关的婴儿猝死及其调查的综合回顾
Matern Child Health J. 2015 Feb;19(2):381-90. doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1520-1.
8
Risk Factors for Suffocation and Unexplained Causes of Infant Deaths.窒息和婴儿死因不明的危险因素。
Pediatrics. 2023 Jan 1;151(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-057771.
9
Sleep position and bed-sharing in sudden infant deaths: an examination of autopsy findings.婴儿猝死中的睡眠姿势与同床睡眠:尸检结果分析
J Pediatr. 2001 Feb;138(2):212-7. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2001.110327.
10
Is SIDS on the rise??婴儿猝死综合征的发生率在上升吗?
J Ky Med Assoc. 2007 Aug;105(8):343-53.

引用本文的文献

1
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS): State of the Art and Future Directions.婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS):现状与未来方向。
Int J Med Sci. 2024 Mar 25;21(5):848-861. doi: 10.7150/ijms.89490. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Inconsistent classification of unexplained sudden deaths in infants and children hinders surveillance, prevention and research: recommendations from The 3rd International Congress on Sudden Infant and Child Death.婴幼儿和儿童不明原因猝死的分类不一致阻碍了监测、预防和研究:第三届国际婴幼儿和儿童死亡大会的建议
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2019 Dec;15(4):622-628. doi: 10.1007/s12024-019-00156-9. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
2
An evaluation of pathologists' application of the diagnostic criteria from the San Diego definition of SIDS and unclassified sudden infant death.对病理学家应用圣地亚哥 SIDS 定义和未分类的婴儿猝死诊断标准的评估。
Int J Legal Med. 2020 May;134(3):1015-1021. doi: 10.1007/s00414-019-02126-w. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
3
An Approach to the Classification of Apparent Asphyxial Infant Deaths.
疑似窒息性婴儿死亡的分类方法
Acad Forensic Pathol. 2017 Jun;7(2):200-211. doi: 10.23907/2017.021. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
4
Sleep-Related Infant Suffocation Deaths Attributable to Soft Bedding, Overlay, and Wedging.与睡眠相关的婴儿窒息死亡归因于柔软的被褥、覆盖物和楔状物。
Pediatrics. 2019 May;143(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-3408.
5
Preventing sudden infant death syndrome and other sleep-related infant deaths.预防婴儿猝死综合征及其他与睡眠相关的婴儿死亡。
JAAPA. 2018 Nov;31(11):25-30. doi: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000546475.33947.44.
6
Variations in Cause-of-Death Determination for Sudden Unexpected Infant Deaths.婴儿意外猝死死因判定的差异
Pediatrics. 2017 Jul;140(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-0087. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
7
SIDS and Other Sleep-Related Infant Deaths: Evidence Base for 2016 Updated Recommendations for a Safe Infant Sleeping Environment.婴儿猝死综合征及其他与睡眠相关的婴儿死亡:2016年安全婴儿睡眠环境更新建议的证据基础。
Pediatrics. 2016 Nov;138(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2940.
8
SIDS and Other Sleep-Related Infant Deaths: Updated 2016 Recommendations for a Safe Infant Sleeping Environment.婴儿猝死综合征及其他与睡眠相关的婴儿死亡:2016年安全婴儿睡眠环境更新建议
Pediatrics. 2016 Nov;138(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2938. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
9
Unintentional asphyxia, SIDS, and medically explained deaths: a descriptive study of outcomes of child death review (CDR) investigations following sudden unexpected death in infancy.意外窒息、婴儿猝死综合征及医学解释性死亡:一项关于婴儿意外猝死儿童死亡审查(CDR)调查结果的描述性研究。
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2016 Dec;12(4):407-415. doi: 10.1007/s12024-016-9802-0. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
10
Death Scene Investigation and Autopsy Practices in Sudden Unexpected Infant Deaths.婴儿猝死综合征中的死亡现场调查与尸检实践
J Pediatr. 2016 Jul;174:84-90.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.03.057. Epub 2016 Apr 22.