Suppr超能文献

比较预处理方法和重密度液体,以优化从天然海洋沉积物中提取微塑料。

Comparison of pre-treatment methods and heavy density liquids to optimize microplastic extraction from natural marine sediments.

机构信息

Department of Marine Sciences, Kristineberg Marine Research Station, University of Gothenburg, Fiskebäckskil, Sweden.

IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Kristineberg Marine Research Station, 451 78, Fiskebäckskil, Sweden.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 14;12(1):15459. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19623-5.

Abstract

The ubiquitous occurrence of anthropogenic particles, including microplastics in the marine environment, has, over the last years, gained worldwide attention. As a result, many methods have been developed to estimate the amount and type of microplastics in the marine environment. However, there are still no standardized protocols for how different marine matrices should be sampled or how to extract and identify these particles, making meaningful data comparison hard. Buoyant microplastics are influenced by winds and currents, and concentrations could hence be expected to be highly variable over time. However, since both high density and most of the initially buoyant microplastics are known to eventually sink and settle on the seafloor, marine sediments are proposed as a suitable matrix for microplastics monitoring. Several principles, apparatuses, and protocols for extracting microplastics from marine sediments have been presented, but extensive comparison of the different steps in the protocols using real environmental samples is lacking. Thus, in this study, different pre-treatment and subsequent density separation protocols for extraction of microplastics from replicate samples of marine sediment were compared. Two pre-treatment methods, one using inorganic chemicals (NaClO + KOH + NaPO) and one using porcine pancreatic enzymes, as well as one with no pre-treatment of the sediment, were compared in combination with two commonly used high-density saline solutions used for density separation, sodium chloride (NaCl) and zinc chloride (ZnCl). Both pre-treatment methods effectively removed organic matter, and both saline solutions extracted lighter plastic particles such as polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP). The most efficient combination, chemical pre-treatment and density separation with ZnCl, was found to extract > 15 times more particles (≥ 100 µm) from the sediment than other treatment combinations, which could largely be explained by the high presence and efficient extraction of PVC particles.

摘要

人为颗粒,包括海洋环境中的微塑料,无处不在,近年来引起了全球关注。因此,已经开发了许多方法来估计海洋环境中微塑料的数量和类型。然而,对于不同的海洋基质应该如何采样,以及如何提取和识别这些颗粒,仍然没有标准化的协议,这使得有意义的数据比较变得困难。浮质微塑料受风和水流的影响,因此浓度预计会随时间高度变化。然而,由于高密度和最初浮质的大多数微塑料已知最终会下沉并沉降在海底,因此海洋沉积物被提议作为微塑料监测的合适基质。已经提出了几种从海洋沉积物中提取微塑料的原理、仪器和协议,但缺乏对协议不同步骤使用真实环境样本的广泛比较。因此,在这项研究中,比较了从重复的海洋沉积物样本中提取微塑料的不同预处理和随后的密度分离协议。两种预处理方法,一种使用无机化学品(NaClO+KOH+NaPO),一种使用猪胰腺酶,以及一种不预处理沉积物,与两种常用的高密度盐溶液(氯化钠(NaCl)和氯化锌(ZnCl))进行了比较。两种预处理方法都有效地去除了有机物,两种盐溶液都提取了较轻的塑料颗粒,如聚乙烯(PE)和聚丙烯(PP)。发现最有效的组合是化学预处理和用 ZnCl 进行密度分离,从沉积物中提取的颗粒(≥100μm)比其他处理组合多 15 倍以上,这主要可以解释为 PVC 颗粒的高存在和有效提取。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3ba/9474529/375aa1a913eb/41598_2022_19623_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验