Earth and Environmental Science Department, University of Milano Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 1, 20126 Milano, Italy.
BÜCHI Labortechnik AG, Meierseggstr. 40, Postfach, CH-9230 Flawil 1, Switzerland.
Mar Pollut Bull. 2021 Jul;168:112436. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112436. Epub 2021 May 5.
Due to the ecotoxicological effects, microplastics are considered a threat for the marine environment. Recent reports indicate their presence not only in subsurface water and in coastal beach sediments, but also in the deep-sea. Notwithstanding, there is still not a scientific consensus about the analytical procedure to be applied for their determination. In this work we compared the performance of two extraction methods: pressurized solvent extraction (PSE) and density separation. Sea sand and seafloor sediments were spiked with known amounts of polystyrene (PS), polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) microplastics and submitted to both the extraction procedures. Results showed that the PSE ensured higher recoveries for the smaller size particle fractions (89,2 ± 1.1% in the 50-150 μm range) whereas the density separation enabled precise recoveries for the larger size particles (SD = 1,5%). No significant differences in terms of blanks control were highlighted.
由于其生态毒性效应,微塑料被认为是海洋环境的威胁之一。最近的报告表明,它们不仅存在于地表水和沿海滩涂沉积物中,而且还存在于深海中。尽管如此,对于其测定应用的分析程序,目前仍没有科学共识。在这项工作中,我们比较了两种提取方法的性能:加压溶剂萃取(PSE)和密度分离。将已知量的聚苯乙烯(PS)、聚乙烯(PE)和聚丙烯(PP)微塑料加入海砂和海底沉积物中,并对这两种提取方法进行了处理。结果表明,PSE 确保了较小粒径颗粒分数(50-150μm 范围内为 89.2±1.1%)的更高回收率,而密度分离则实现了较大粒径颗粒的精确回收率(SD=1.5%)。空白对照方面没有明显差异。