• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DXA 图像的骨龄读取不应替代 X 射线图像的骨龄读取。

Bone Age Reading by DXA Images should not Replace Bone Age Reading by X-ray Images.

机构信息

Clinical Epidemiology Research Unit, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico; Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.

Epidemiological Research Unit in Endocrinology and Nutrition, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez.

出版信息

J Clin Densitom. 2022 Oct-Dec;25(4):456-463. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.jocd.2022.08.004
PMID:36109296
Abstract

X-ray image of the hand is the most used technique to estimate bone age in children. For the analysis of bone mineral density using DXA in children, bone age may help to adjust such measurement in some cases. During image acquisition in DXA, an anteroposterior image of the hand may be acquired and used to evaluate bone age but few studies have evaluated the agreement between conventional X-ray and DXA images. The aim of the study was to determine bone age estimation agreement between conventional X-ray images and DXA in children and adolescents aged 5 to 16 years of age. We performed an analytical cross-sectional study of 711 healthy subjects. Subject´s bone age, both in conventional X-ray, and DXA images were read independently by two expert evaluators blinded for chronological age. Intraobserver and inter-observer reproducibility were evaluated using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), and the agreement between bone age estimations made by both evaluators was analyzed using ICC and Bland-Altman analysis. General agreement between techniques measured through ICC was 0.99 with a mean difference of 6 months between techniques being older the ages obtained by DXA. The agreement limits were around ±2 years, which means that 95% of all differences between techniques were covered within this range. We found a high level of ICC agreement in bone age readings from X-ray and DXA images although we observed overestimation of bone age measurements in DXA. Differences between techniques were greater in women than in men, especially at the ages corresponding to puberty. Bone age measurement in DXA images appears not to be reliable; hence it should be suggested to perform conventional radiography of the hand to assess bone age taking into account that X-ray images have better resolution.

摘要

手部 X 射线图像是估计儿童骨龄最常用的技术。对于使用 DXA 分析儿童的骨矿物质密度,在某些情况下,骨龄可能有助于调整这种测量。在 DXA 图像采集期间,可能会获取手部前后位图像,并用于评估骨龄,但很少有研究评估常规 X 射线和 DXA 图像之间的一致性。本研究的目的是确定 5 至 16 岁儿童和青少年常规 X 射线和 DXA 图像之间骨龄估计的一致性。我们对 711 名健康受试者进行了分析性横断面研究。由两名独立的专家评估者在不知道实际年龄的情况下对受试者的常规 X 射线和 DXA 图像的骨龄进行了阅读。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估了观察者内和观察者间的可重复性,并使用 ICC 和 Bland-Altman 分析评估了两位评估者之间的骨龄估计一致性。通过 ICC 测量的两种技术之间的总体一致性为 0.99,平均差异为 6 个月,DXA 获得的年龄较大。协议范围在±2 年左右,这意味着两种技术之间 95%的所有差异都在该范围内。我们发现 X 射线和 DXA 图像的骨龄读数具有很高的 ICC 一致性,但我们观察到 DXA 中的骨龄测量值存在高估。在女性中,技术之间的差异大于男性,尤其是在对应于青春期的年龄。DXA 图像中的骨龄测量似乎不可靠;因此,建议对手部进行常规 X 射线检查以评估骨龄,同时考虑到 X 射线图像具有更好的分辨率。

相似文献

1
Bone Age Reading by DXA Images should not Replace Bone Age Reading by X-ray Images.DXA 图像的骨龄读取不应替代 X 射线图像的骨龄读取。
J Clin Densitom. 2022 Oct-Dec;25(4):456-463. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
2
Bone age assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in children: an alternative for X-ray?双能 X 射线吸收法在儿童骨龄评估中的应用:X 射线的替代方法?
Br J Radiol. 2012 Feb;85(1010):114-20. doi: 10.1259/bjr/23858213. Epub 2011 May 17.
3
Bone health of children with intestinal failure measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and digital X-ray radiogrammetry.应用双能 X 射线吸收法和数字 X 射线放射图法测量肠衰竭儿童的骨健康状况。
Clin Nutr. 2018 Apr;37(2):687-694. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.02.014. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
4
Comparison of DXA Scans and Conventional X-rays for Spine Morphometry and Bone Age Determination in Children.双能X线吸收法扫描与传统X线用于儿童脊柱形态测量和骨龄测定的比较
J Clin Densitom. 2016 Apr-Jun;19(2):208-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
5
Feasibility of Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Based Images for Measurement of Height, Sitting Height, and Leg Length in Children.基于双能 X 射线吸收法的图像测量儿童身高、坐高和腿长的可行性。
J Clin Densitom. 2020 Jul-Sep;23(3):472-481. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
6
Large variations occur in bone density measurements of children when using different software.
Nucl Med Commun. 2005 Jun;26(6):483-7. doi: 10.1097/00006231-200506000-00002.
7
Evaluation of the possibility to assess bone age on the basis of DXA derived hand scans-preliminary results.基于双能X线吸收法(DXA)手部扫描评估骨龄可能性的初步结果
Osteoporos Int. 2004 Apr;15(4):317-22. doi: 10.1007/s00198-003-1545-6. Epub 2003 Nov 13.
8
Concordance between muscle mass assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis and by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: a cross-sectional study.生物电阻抗分析与双能X线吸收法评估肌肉量的一致性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Mar 18;16:60. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0510-9.
9
Can digital X-ray radiogrammetry be an alternative for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the diagnosis of secondary low bone quality in children?数字化 X 射线放射摄影术可否作为双能 X 射线吸收法在儿童继发性低骨质量诊断中的替代方法?
Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Sep;178(9):1433-1441. doi: 10.1007/s00431-019-03425-5. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of DXA compared to conventional spine radiographs for the detection of vertebral fractures in children.与传统脊柱X光片相比,双能X线吸收法(DXA)检测儿童椎体骨折的诊断准确性。
Eur Radiol. 2017 May;27(5):2188-2199. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4556-3. Epub 2016 Sep 21.