• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Efficacy of the Atraumatic Physics Forceps Over Conventional Extraction Forceps in Extraction of Tooth-Does it Offer an Alternative in All Types of Extraction or Only can be Used in Few Selected Types of Extraction: A Comparative Study.无创物理镊子与传统拔牙钳在牙齿拔除中的疗效比较——它是能为所有类型的拔牙提供替代方案,还是仅适用于少数特定类型的拔牙:一项对比研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022 Jul;14(Suppl 1):S859-S862. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_27_22. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
2
Comparison Between Physics and Conventional Forceps in Simple Dental Extraction.简单牙拔除术中物理方法与传统拔牙钳的比较
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015 Dec;14(4):949-55. doi: 10.1007/s12663-015-0765-6. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
3
Use of Physics Forceps in Atraumatic Orthodontic Extractions of Bilateral Premolars: A Randomized Control Clinical Study.物理镊子在双侧前磨牙无创伤正畸拔牙中的应用:一项随机对照临床研究。
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020 Sep;19(3):347-354. doi: 10.1007/s12663-020-01347-6. Epub 2020 May 5.
4
Evaluation and Comparison of Physics Forceps and Conventional Forceps in Bilateral Dental Extraction: A Randomized, Split-Mouth, Clinical Study.双侧牙拔除术中物理镊与传统镊的评估与比较:一项随机、分口、临床研究
Cureus. 2023 Apr 27;15(4):e38206. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38206. eCollection 2023 Apr.
5
Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Physics Forceps versus Conventional Forceps in Orthodontic Extractions: A Prospective Randomized Split Mouth Study.正畸拔牙中物理镊子与传统镊子疗效的比较评估:一项前瞻性随机双颌研究。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Jul;10(7):ZC41-5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17724.8160. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
6
Comparative evaluation of efficacy of physics forcep and conventional forceps for extraction of maxillary molars.物理拔牙钳与传统拔牙钳拔除上颌磨牙疗效的比较评估
Minerva Dent Oral Sci. 2024 Apr;73(2):75-80. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6329.23.04740-X. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
7
Bilateral orthodontic extractions using physics versus conventional forceps among Indian patients.印度患者中使用物理器械与传统拔牙钳进行双侧正畸拔牙的情况。
Bioinformation. 2023 Jan 31;19(1):143-148. doi: 10.6026/97320630019143. eCollection 2023.
8
Comparative evaluation of efficacy of Physics Forceps versus conventional forceps in pediatric dental extractions: a prospective randomized study.物理镊子与传统镊子在儿童牙齿拔除术中的疗效比较评估:一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Dec;21(6):547-556. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2021.21.6.547. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
9
The Efficacy of Physics Forceps for Exodontia: A Systematic Review.物理拔牙钳的疗效:一项系统评价。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 May;79(5):989.e1-989.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.12.033. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
10
Beak and bumper - Physics forceps: Evaluation of new technique in extraction.喙形与缓冲型——物理镊子:拔牙新技术评估
Indian J Dent Res. 2020 Jan-Feb;31(1):4-13. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_433_18.

引用本文的文献

1
The Use of Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) in the Management of Dry Socket: A Systematic Review.富含血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)在干槽症治疗中的应用:系统评价。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Sep 19;25(18):10069. doi: 10.3390/ijms251810069.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Physics Forceps versus Conventional Forceps in Orthodontic Extractions: A Prospective Randomized Split Mouth Study.正畸拔牙中物理镊子与传统镊子疗效的比较评估:一项前瞻性随机双颌研究。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Jul;10(7):ZC41-5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17724.8160. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
2
Comparison Between Physics and Conventional Forceps in Simple Dental Extraction.简单牙拔除术中物理方法与传统拔牙钳的比较
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015 Dec;14(4):949-55. doi: 10.1007/s12663-015-0765-6. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
3
Split-mouth comparison of physics forceps and extraction forceps in orthodontic extraction of upper premolars.正畸拔除上颌前磨牙时物理镊子与拔牙镊子的分口比较
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Dec;52(10):e137-40. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.06.013. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
4
Atraumatic extractions: a biomechanical rationale.无创拔牙:生物力学原理
Dent Today. 2008 Aug;27(8):98, 100-1.

无创物理镊子与传统拔牙钳在牙齿拔除中的疗效比较——它是能为所有类型的拔牙提供替代方案,还是仅适用于少数特定类型的拔牙:一项对比研究

Efficacy of the Atraumatic Physics Forceps Over Conventional Extraction Forceps in Extraction of Tooth-Does it Offer an Alternative in All Types of Extraction or Only can be Used in Few Selected Types of Extraction: A Comparative Study.

作者信息

Laskar Shyamalendu, Singh Mamta, Suman Anshika, Sahu Satyajit, Mishra Bibhu P, Sahoo Abhijeeta

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Index Institute of Dental Sciences, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Department of Periodontology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022 Jul;14(Suppl 1):S859-S862. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_27_22. Epub 2022 Jul 13.

DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_27_22
PMID:36110718
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9469256/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy of physics forceps in dental extractions as compared with conventional forceps and as well as to evaluate its atraumatic point of view.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 200 healthy adult patients were included in the study who reported for dental extractions, divided into two groups each containing 100 patients. The patients were randomly allocated into either group by lottery method.

RESULTS

Operating time in the physics forceps group was found to be significantly reduced as well as lesser incidence of dry socket was noted which was statistically significant on the 2 day postoperatively. However, incidence of root fracture, buccal plate fracture, and gingival lacerations were not found to be statistically significant but their occurrence was less in the physics forceps group as compared with the conventional forceps group.

CONCLUSION

To conclude, we can say that extractions done by physics forceps results in significant reduction in unnecessary trauma as well as stress to both the operator and patient. The forceps is an atraumatic extraction system which is a boon for the profession, thereby reducing ridge deformities and preparing the patients for future prosthesis.

摘要

未标注

我们开展这项研究是为了评估物理拔牙钳与传统拔牙钳相比在拔牙中的疗效,并从无创伤角度对其进行评估。

材料与方法

本研究共纳入200名因拔牙前来就诊的健康成年患者,分为两组,每组100名患者。通过抽签法将患者随机分配到任意一组。

结果

发现物理拔牙钳组的操作时间显著缩短,且干槽症的发生率较低,术后第2天具有统计学意义。然而,根折、颊侧骨板骨折和牙龈撕裂的发生率无统计学意义,但与传统拔牙钳组相比,物理拔牙钳组的发生率更低。

结论

总之,我们可以说使用物理拔牙钳进行拔牙可显著减少对术者和患者不必要的创伤及压力。该拔牙钳是一种无创伤拔牙系统,对该行业来说是一项福音,从而减少牙槽嵴畸形,并为患者未来的修复做好准备。