• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparing Sexual Network Mean Active Degree Measurement Metrics Among Men Who Have Sex With Men.比较男男性行为者性网络平均活跃程度测量指标。
Sex Transm Dis. 2022 Dec 1;49(12):808-814. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001708. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
2
Egocentric sexual networks of men who have sex with men in the United States: Results from the ARTnet study.美国男男性行为者的自我中心性网络:ARTnet研究结果
Epidemics. 2020 Jan 24;30:100386. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2020.100386.
3
Trends in Number and Composition of Sex Partners Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States, National HIV Behavioral Surveillance, 2008-2014.美国男男性行为者性伴侣数量和构成的变化趋势,全国艾滋病毒行为监测,2008-2014 年。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019 Jul 1;81(3):257-265. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002025.
4
Assessment of a new web-based sexual concurrency measurement tool for men who have sex with men.对一种面向男男性行为者的新型网络性伴关系测量工具的评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Nov 10;16(11):e246. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3211.
5
National trends in sexual health indicators among gay and bisexual men disaggregated by ethnicity: repeated cross-sectional behavioural surveillance in New Zealand.按种族分类的男同性恋者和双性恋男性性健康指标的全国趋势:新西兰的重复横断面行为监测。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 17;10(11):e039896. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039896.
6
Homophobia and heteronormativity as dimensions of stigma that influence sexual risk behaviors among men who have sex with men (MSM) and women (MSMW) in Lima, Peru: a mixed-methods analysis.恐同和异性恋规范作为污名的维度,影响秘鲁利马的男男性行为者(MSM)和女男性行为者(MSMW)的性行为风险:一项混合方法分析。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 21;19(1):617. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6956-1.
7
The Characteristics and Risk Factors of Web-Based Sexual Behaviors Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Eastern China: Cross-sectional Study.中国东部地区男男性行为者网络性行为的特征和风险因素:横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Sep 2;7(9):e25360. doi: 10.2196/25360.
8
Assessment of Bias in Estimates of Sexual Network Degree using Prospective Cohort Data.使用前瞻性队列数据评估性网络程度估计中的偏差。
Epidemiology. 2020 Mar;31(2):229-237. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001151.
9
Does online dating lead to higher sexual risk behaviour? A cross-sectional study among MSM in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.网上约会会导致更高的性风险行为吗?荷兰阿姆斯特丹男男性行为者的横断面研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Jun 14;16:288. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1637-5.
10
Multiple and concurrent sexual partnerships among men who have sex with men in Viet Nam: results from a National Internet-based Cross-sectional Survey.越南男男性行为者中的多重及同时存在的性伴侣关系:一项基于互联网的全国横断面调查结果
Health Promot Int. 2016 Mar;31(1):133-43. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dau097. Epub 2014 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Incorporating social determinants of health into agent-based models of HIV transmission: methodological challenges and future directions.将健康的社会决定因素纳入基于主体的HIV传播模型:方法学挑战与未来方向。
Front Epidemiol. 2025 Feb 27;5:1533119. doi: 10.3389/fepid.2025.1533119. eCollection 2025.
2
Factors Associated With Syphilis Transmission and Acquisition Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: Protocol for a Multisite Egocentric Network Study.男男性行为者中梅毒传播与感染的相关因素:一项多中心自我中心网络研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Nov 4;11(11):e40095. doi: 10.2196/40095.

比较男男性行为者性网络平均活跃程度测量指标。

Comparing Sexual Network Mean Active Degree Measurement Metrics Among Men Who Have Sex With Men.

机构信息

From the Department of Epidemiology, Rollin School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

Departments of Sociology.

出版信息

Sex Transm Dis. 2022 Dec 1;49(12):808-814. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001708. Epub 2022 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001708
PMID:36112005
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9669154/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mean active degree is an important proxy measure of cross-sectional network connectivity commonly used in HIV/sexually transmitted infection epidemiology research. No current studies have compared measurement methods of mean degree using a cross-sectional study design for men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States. We compared mean degree estimates based on reported ongoing main and casual sexual partnerships (current method) against dates of first and last sex (retrospective method).

METHODS

We used data from ARTnet, a cross-sectional survey of MSM in the United States (2017-2019). ARTnet collected data on the number and types of sexual partners in the past year, limited to the 5 most recent partners (data truncation). We quantified partnerships for months 0 to 12 before the survey date (retrospective method) and compared that with ongoing partnerships on the day of survey (current method). We used linear regression to understand the impact of truncated partnership data on mean degree estimation.

RESULTS

The retrospective method yielded similar degree estimates to the current for months proximate to the day of survey. The retrospective method mean degree systematically decreased as the month increased from 0 to 12 months before survey date. This was driven by data truncation: among participants with >5 partners in the past year compared with those with ≤5, the average change in main partnership degree between 12 and 0 months before survey date was -0.05 (95% confidence interval, -0.08 to -0.03) after adjusting for race/ethnicity, age, and education. The adjusted average change in casual partnership degree was -0.40 (95% confidence interval, -0.45 to -0.35).

CONCLUSIONS

The retrospective method underestimates mean degree for MSM in surveys with truncated partnership data, especially for casual partnerships. The current method is less prone to bias from partner truncation when the target population has high rate of partners per year.

摘要

背景

平均活跃程度是 HIV/性传播感染流行病学研究中常用的衡量横截面网络连通性的重要替代指标。目前尚无研究比较过美国男男性行为者(MSM)的横断面研究设计中基于报告的持续主要和偶然性关系(现行方法)与首次和末次性行为日期(回顾性方法)的平均程度估计方法。

方法

我们使用了美国 MSM 的横断面调查 ARTnet 的数据(2017-2019 年)。ARTnet 收集了过去一年中性伴侣的数量和类型的数据,仅限于最近的 5 个性伴侣(数据截断)。我们对调查日期前 12 个月(回顾性方法)的关系进行了量化,并将其与调查日的持续关系进行了比较。我们使用线性回归来了解截断伙伴关系数据对平均程度估计的影响。

结果

回顾性方法在接近调查日的月份中得出的程度估计与现行方法相似。回顾性方法的平均程度随着从调查日期前 12 个月到 0 个月的月份增加而系统地降低。这是由数据截断驱动的:与过去一年中拥有 >5 个性伴侣的参与者相比,那些拥有 ≤5 个性伴侣的参与者,在调查日期前 12 个月到 0 个月期间,主要伙伴关系程度的平均变化为 -0.05(95%置信区间,-0.08 至 -0.03),调整了种族/民族、年龄和教育等因素后。偶然伙伴关系程度的平均变化为 -0.40(95%置信区间,-0.45 至 -0.35)。

结论

在具有截断伙伴关系数据的调查中,回顾性方法低估了 MSM 的平均程度,特别是对偶然伙伴关系而言。当目标人群每年的伴侣数量较高时,现行方法不太容易受到伴侣截断的偏差影响。