Schwihla Ines, Wieser Karl, Grubhofer Florian, Zimmermann Stefan M
Department of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland.
Department of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Feb;32(2):269-275. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.07.025. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
Since its first proposal, the concept of on- and off-track lesions in anterior shoulder instability has gained clinical relevance as a tool to predict the failure rate of arthroscopic Bankart repair. Current literature only reports either short-term follow-up or long-term results of small sample sizes. The aim of this study was to provide a long-term evaluation of recurrent instability following arthroscopic Bankart repair in a large cohort using the on-track vs. off-track concept as a predictor for failure.
We retrospectively analyzed 271 patients who underwent primary arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability between 1998 and 2007. All patients with a minimum follow-up of 78 months and a preoperative computed tomographic (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan were included into the study. Preoperative CT and/or MRI scans were used to determine the glenoid track and width of Hill-Sachs lesion. Recurrence of instability was defined as presence of instability symptoms (dislocation, subluxation, and/or apprehension) or revision surgery (stabilization procedure) and was assessed as the primary outcome parameter.
The glenoid track of 163 shoulders was assessed (female n = 51, male n = 112) with a mean follow-up of 124 months (99.4-145.6, standard deviation = 2.5) and a mean age of 24 years (20-34.). An off-track Hill-Sachs lesion was found in 77 cases (47%), and in 86 cases (53 %) it was on-track. The rate of recurrent instability in the off-track group was 74% (n = 57) compared with 27% (n = 23) in the on-track group (P < .001). The overall rate of revision surgery due to instability was 29% (n = 48) after a mean time of 50.9 months (±42.8) following Bankart repair. The rate of revision surgery in the off-track group was 48% (n = 37) after a mean of 53.5 months (±42.0) vs. 13% (n = 11) after 42.3 months (±46.3) in the on-track group (P < .001).
This study shows that the on- and off-track concept helps to distinguish patients for whom an isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair yields long-term benefits. Because of the high rate of recurrent instability in the off-track group, an off-track lesion should be treated surgically in such a way that the off-track lesion is converted into an on-track lesion.
自首次提出以来,前肩不稳中轨道内和轨道外损伤的概念作为预测关节镜下Bankart修复失败率的工具,已具有临床相关性。目前的文献仅报道了短期随访或小样本量的长期结果。本研究的目的是在一个大型队列中,使用轨道内与轨道外的概念作为失败预测指标,对关节镜下Bankart修复术后复发性不稳进行长期评估。
我们回顾性分析了1998年至2007年间因前肩不稳接受初次关节镜下Bankart修复的271例患者。所有至少随访78个月且术前行计算机断层扫描(CT)或磁共振成像(MRI)检查的患者均纳入本研究。术前CT和/或MRI扫描用于确定肩胛盂轨道和Hill-Sachs损伤的宽度。不稳复发定义为存在不稳症状(脱位、半脱位和/或恐惧)或翻修手术(稳定手术),并将其作为主要结局参数进行评估。
评估了163例肩部的肩胛盂轨道(女性51例,男性112例),平均随访124个月(99.4 - 145.6,标准差 = 2.5),平均年龄24岁(20 - 34岁)。77例(47%)发现有轨道外Hill-Sachs损伤,86例(53%)为轨道内损伤。轨道外组的不稳复发率为74%(n = 57),而轨道内组为27%(n = 23)(P < .001)。Bankart修复术后平均50.9个月(±42.8),因不稳进行翻修手术的总体发生率为29%(n = 48)。轨道外组翻修手术率为48%(n = 37),平均时间为53.5个月(±42.0),而轨道内组在42.3个月(±46.3)后的翻修手术率为13%(n = 11)(P < .001)。
本研究表明,轨道内和轨道外的概念有助于区分单纯关节镜下Bankart修复能带来长期益处的患者。由于轨道外组不稳复发率高,对于轨道外损伤应采取手术治疗,使轨道外损伤转变为轨道内损伤。