Division of Research and Modeling, Center for Financing, Access and Cost Trends, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, USA.
Division of Research and Modeling, Center for Financing, Access and Cost Trends, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, USA.
Value Health. 2023 Feb;26(2):226-233. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.08.001. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
This study aimed to estimate the impact of sharing drug rebates at the point of sale on out-of-pocket spending by linking estimated rebates to administrative claims data for employer-sponsored insurance enrollees in 2018.
We applied the drug rebate rate to the retail price of each brand name drug fill, allocated the reductions to out-of-pocket spending based on cost-sharing provisions, and aggregated each individual's out-of-pocket spending across drug fills. We assumed that generic drugs have no rebates for employer-sponsored insurance. We assessed the impact of sharing rebates at the point of sale on out-of-pocket spending overall, for the therapeutic classes and specific drugs with the highest average out-of-pocket spending per user, and by health plan type.
Across 4 simulations with different assumptions about the degree of cross-fill effects, we found that 10.4% to 12.2% of enrollees in our sample would have realized savings on out-of-pocket spending if rebates were shared to the point of sale. Among those with savings, approximately half would save $50 or less, and 10% would save > $500 annually. We calculated that a premium increase of $1.06 to $1.41 per member per month among the continuously enrolled, insured population would be sufficient to finance the out-of-pocket savings in our sample.
Our study suggests that, for a small percentage of enrollees, sharing drug rebates at the point of sale would likely improve the affordability of high-priced brand name drugs, especially drugs that face significant competition.
本研究旨在通过将估计的回扣与 2018 年雇主赞助保险参保者的行政索赔数据相关联,估计销售点共享药品回扣对自付支出的影响。
我们将药品回扣率应用于每个品牌药品的零售价格,根据成本分担规定将回扣分配给自付支出,并将每个个体在药品使用过程中的自付支出汇总起来。我们假设对于雇主赞助的保险,仿制药没有回扣。我们评估了在销售点共享回扣对总体自付支出、具有最高平均用户自付支出的治疗类别和特定药物以及不同健康计划类型的影响。
在对交叉填充效应程度有不同假设的 4 个模拟中,我们发现,如果将回扣共享到销售点,我们样本中的 10.4%至 12.2%的参保者将实现自付支出的节省。在有节省的人群中,大约一半的人将节省 50 美元或更少,10%的人每年将节省超过 500 美元。我们计算得出,对于连续参保的保险人群,每月每个成员需增加 1.06 美元至 1.41 美元的保费,足以支付我们样本中的自付支出节省。
我们的研究表明,对于一小部分参保者而言,在销售点共享药品回扣可能会提高高价品牌药品的可负担性,特别是那些面临激烈竞争的药品。