Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Research Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
NMR Biomed. 2023 Feb;36(2):e4834. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4834. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
Measurement of the longitudinal relaxation time in the rotating frame of reference (T ) is sensitive to the fidelity of the main imaging magnetic field (B ) and that of the RF pulse (B ). The purpose of this study was to introduce methods for producing continuous wave (CW) T contrast with improved robustness against field inhomogeneities and to compare the sensitivities of several existing and the novel T contrast generation methods with the B and B field inhomogeneities. Four hard-pulse and four adiabatic CW-T magnetization preparations were investigated. Bloch simulations and experimental measurements at different spin-lock amplitudes under ideal and non-ideal conditions, as well as theoretical analysis of the hard-pulse preparations, were conducted to assess the sensitivity of the methods to field inhomogeneities, at low (ω << ΔB ) and high (ω >> ΔB ) spin-locking field strengths. In simulations, previously reported single-refocus and new triple-refocus hard-pulse and double-refocus adiabatic preparation schemes were found to be the most robust. The mean normalized absolute deviation between the experimentally measured relaxation times under ideal and non-ideal conditions was found to be smallest for the refocused preparation schemes and broadly in agreement with the sensitivities observed in simulations. Experimentally, all refocused preparations performed better than those that were non-refocused. The findings promote the use of the previously reported hard-pulse single-refocus ΔB and B insensitive T as a robust method with minimal RF energy deposition. The double-refocus adiabatic B insensitive rotation-4 CW-T preparation offers further improved insensitivity to field variations, but because of the extra RF deposition, may be preferred for ex vivo applications.
在旋转坐标系中测量纵向弛豫时间(T )对主成像磁场(B )和射频脉冲(B )的保真度敏感。本研究旨在介绍产生连续波(CW)T 对比的方法,以提高对磁场不均匀性的稳健性,并比较几种现有和新型 T 对比生成方法对 B 和 B 场不均匀性的敏感性。研究了四种硬脉冲和四种绝热 CW-T 磁化准备方法。进行了布洛赫模拟和在理想和非理想条件下不同旋锁幅度下的实验测量,以及硬脉冲准备方法的理论分析,以评估这些方法对磁场不均匀性的敏感性,在低(ω << ΔB )和高(ω >> ΔB )旋锁场强度下。在模拟中,发现先前报道的单重聚焦和新的三重聚焦硬脉冲以及双重聚焦绝热准备方案具有最强的稳健性。实验测量的弛豫时间在理想和非理想条件下的归一化绝对偏差的平均值对于重聚焦的准备方案最小,与模拟中观察到的敏感性基本一致。实验中,所有重聚焦的准备方案都比非重聚焦的准备方案表现更好。这些发现促进了使用先前报道的硬脉冲单重聚焦ΔB 和 B 不敏感 T 作为一种稳健的方法,具有最小的 RF 能量沉积。双重聚焦绝热 B 不敏感旋转 4CW-T 准备方法提供了进一步提高对磁场变化的不敏感性,但由于额外的 RF 沉积,可能更适合离体应用。