Lozano-Granero Cristina, Franco Eduardo, Matía-Francés Roberto, Hernández-Madrid Antonio, Sánchez-Pérez Inmaculada, Zamorano José Luis, Moreno Javier
Arrhythmia Unit, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Arrhythmia Unit, Paediatric Cardiology, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Dec;33(12):2528-2537. doi: 10.1111/jce.15676. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
High-power short-duration (HPSD) has been proposed to shorten procedure times while maintaining efficacy and safety. We evaluated the differences in size and geometry between radiofrequency lesions obtained with this method and conventional ones.
Twenty-eight sets of 10 perpendicular radiofrequency applications were performed with two commercially available catheters: a temperature-controlled HPSD catheter (QDot-Micro) and a conventional power-controlled catheter (Thermocool SmartTouch) on porcine left ventricle. Different power settings (35, 40, 50, and 90 W), contact force (CF; 10 and 20 g), ablation index (AI; 400 and 550), and application times were combined to create conventional (35-40 W), HPSD (50 W) and very-high-power short-duration (VHPSD; 90 W) lesions, that were cross-sectioned and measured. About 4-s VHPSD lesions were smaller, shallower, and thinner than HPSD performed with the QDot-Micro catheter in any scenario of CF or AI (61 ± 7.8 mm , 6.1 ± 0.3 mm wide, and 2.9 ± 0.1 mm deep with 10 g; 72.2 ± 0.5 mm , 6.8 ± 0.3 mm wide, and 2.9 ± 0.2 mm deep with 20 g). Conventional and HPSD lesions performed with the temperature-controlled catheter were generally bigger, deeper, and wider than the ones obtained with the power-controlled catheter, as well as more consistent in size. This was especially true with the lower CF and AI scenario, while differences were less notable with other setting combinations.
VHPSD lesions performed with QDot-Micro catheter were smaller than any other lesions, which is especially attractive for posterior left atrial wall ablation. On the contrary, conventional-powered and HPSD lesions performed with this catheter were equally sized (or even bigger with lower CF and AI objectives), as well as more consistent in size, which would guarantee transmurality in other locations.
高功率短持续时间(HPSD)技术已被提出用于缩短手术时间,同时保持疗效和安全性。我们评估了用这种方法获得的射频消融灶与传统射频消融灶在大小和几何形状上的差异。
使用两种市售导管在猪左心室上进行了28组每组10次的垂直射频消融操作:一种是温度控制的HPSD导管(QDot-Micro),另一种是传统的功率控制导管(Thermocool SmartTouch)。将不同的功率设置(35、40、50和90W)、接触力(CF;10和20g)、消融指数(AI;400和550)以及消融时间进行组合,以创建传统(35 - 40W)、HPSD(50W)和超高功率短持续时间(VHPSD;90W)的消融灶,然后对这些消融灶进行横截面测量。在任何CF或AI情况下,使用QDot-Micro导管进行的约4秒VHPSD消融灶都比HPSD消融灶更小、更浅且更薄(10g时为61±7.8mm²,宽6.1±0.3mm,深2.9±0.1mm;20g时为72.2±0.5mm²,宽6.8±0.3mm,深2.9±0.2mm)。使用温度控制导管进行的传统和HPSD消融灶通常比使用功率控制导管获得的消融灶更大、更深且更宽,并且在大小上更一致。在较低CF和AI的情况下尤其如此,而在其他设置组合下差异则不太明显。
使用QDot-Micro导管进行的VHPSD消融灶比其他任何消融灶都小,这对于左心房后壁消融尤其有吸引力。相反,使用该导管进行的传统功率和HPSD消融灶大小相同(在较低CF和AI目标下甚至更大),并且在大小上更一致,这将确保在其他部位实现透壁性。