School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University Hospital, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023 Mar;75(3):401-410. doi: 10.1002/art.42350. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
In trials of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the SLE Responder Index (SRI) is the most commonly used primary efficacy end point but has limited validation against long-term outcomes. We aimed to investigate associations of attainment of a modified version of the SRI (mSRI) with key clinical outcomes in SLE patients with up to 5 years of follow-up.
We used data from a large multicenter, longitudinal SLE cohort in which patients received standard of care. The first visit with active disease (defined as SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 [SLEDAI-2K] score ≥6) was designated as baseline, and mSRI attainment (defined as a reduction in SLEDAI-2K ≥4 points with no worsening in physician global assessment ≥0.3 points) was determined at annual intervals from baseline up to 5 years. Associations between mSRI attainment and outcomes including disease activity, glucocorticoid dose, flare, damage accrual, Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS), and remission were studied.
We included 2,060 patients, with a median baseline SLEDAI-2K score of 8. An mSRI response was attained by 56% of patients at 1 year, with similar responder rates seen at subsequent annual time points. Compared to nonresponders, mSRI responders had significantly lower disease activity and prednisolone dose and higher proportions of LLDAS and remission attainment at each year, and less damage accrual at years 2 and 3. Furthermore, mSRI responder status at 1 year predicted clinical benefit at subsequent years across most outcomes, including damage accrual (odds ratio [OR] range 0.58-0.69, P < 0.05 for damage accrual ORs at all time points).
In SLE patients with active disease receiving standard of care, mSRI attainment predicts favorable outcomes over long-term follow-up, supporting the clinical meaningfulness of SRI attainment as an SLE trial end point.
在系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的临床试验中,SLE 应答指数(SRI)是最常用的主要疗效终点,但针对长期结局的验证有限。我们旨在调查达到改良版 SRI(mSRI)与 SLE 患者最长达 5 年随访的关键临床结局之间的关联。
我们使用了一个大型多中心、纵向 SLE 队列的患者数据,这些患者接受了标准治疗。将有活动疾病的首次就诊(定义为 SLE 疾病活动指数 2000 [SLEDAI-2K]评分≥6)指定为基线,mSRI 达标(定义为 SLEDAI-2K 降低≥4 分且医师总体评估没有恶化≥0.3 分)从基线开始每年评估一次,最长可达 5 年。研究了 mSRI 达标与疾病活动度、糖皮质激素剂量、发作、损伤累积、狼疮低疾病活动状态(LLDAS)和缓解等结局之间的关系。
我们纳入了 2060 例患者,基线 SLEDAI-2K 评分中位数为 8。1 年内,56%的患者达到 mSRI 应答,随后各年度的应答率相似。与无应答者相比,mSRI 应答者在每个年度的疾病活动度和泼尼松剂量较低,LLDAS 和缓解的比例较高,且在第 2 年和第 3 年的损伤累积较少。此外,1 年内的 mSRI 应答状态预测了后续年份的临床获益,大多数结局均如此,包括损伤累积(优势比[OR]范围为 0.58-0.69,所有时间点的损伤累积 OR 均<0.05)。
在接受标准治疗的有活动疾病的 SLE 患者中,mSRI 达标预测了长期随访的良好结局,支持 SRI 达标作为 SLE 试验终点的临床意义。