• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在为受训心脏病学研究员应用最低推荐程序数量时,超声心动图核心能力的可变暴露。

Variable exposure to echocardiography core competencies when applying minimum recommended procedural numbers for cardiology fellows in training.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.

Department of Nuclear Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2022 Sep 20;20(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12947-022-00294-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12947-022-00294-1
PMID:36123701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9487095/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The American College of Cardiology Core Cardiovascular Training Statement (COCATS) defined echocardiography core competencies and set the minimum recommend number of echocardiograms to perform (150) and interpret (300) for independent practice in echocardiography (level 2 training). Fellows may lack exposure to key pathologies that are relatively infrequent, however, even when achieving an adequate number of studies performed and interpreted. We hypothesized that cardiology fellows would lack exposure to 1 or more cardiac pathologies related to core competencies in COCATS when performing and interpreting the minimum recommend number of studies for level 2 training.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 11,250 reports from consecutive echocardiograms interpreted (7,500) and performed (3,750) by 25 cardiology fellows at a University tertiary referral hospital who graduated between 2015 and 2019. The first 300 echocardiograms interpreted and the first 150 echocardiograms performed by each fellow were included in the analysis. Echocardiography reports were reviewed for cardiac pathologies relating to core competencies defined in COCATS.

RESULTS

All 25 fellows lacked exposure to 1 or more cardiac pathologies related to echocardiography core competencies despite meeting COCATS minimum recommended numbers for echocardiograms performed and interpreted. Pathologies for which 1 or more fellows encountered 0 cases despite meeting the minimum recommended numbers for both echocardiograms performed and interpreted included: pericardial constriction (16/25 fellows), aortic dissection (15/25 fellows), pericardial tamponade (4/25 fellows), valvular mass/thrombus (2/25 fellows), prosthetic valve dysfunction (1/25 fellows), and cardiac chamber mass/thrombus (1/25 fellows).

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiology fellows who completed the minimum recommend number of echocardiograms performed and interpreted for COCATS level 2 training frequently lacked exposure to cardiac pathologies, even in a University tertiary referral hospital setting. These data suggest that fellowship programs should monitor pathology case counts for each fellow in training, in addition to the minimum recommend number of echocardiograms defined by COCATS, to ensure competency for independent practice in echocardiography.

摘要

背景

美国心脏病学院核心心血管培训声明(COCATS)定义了超声心动图核心能力,并为独立进行超声心动图实践(二级培训)设定了最低推荐执行(150 次)和解释(300 次)的超声心动图次数。然而,即使完成了足够数量的检查和解释,研究员可能也缺乏接触相对罕见的关键病理的机会。我们假设,当执行和解释二级培训中推荐的最低数量的研究时,心脏病学研究员可能会对与 COCATS 核心能力相关的一种或多种心脏病理学缺乏了解。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2015 年至 2019 年期间在一家大学三级转诊医院工作的 25 名心脏病学研究员完成的(3750 次)和解释的(7500 次)连续超声心动图报告。每位研究员的前 300 次超声心动图解释和前 150 次超声心动图执行都包含在分析中。审查超声心动图报告以查找与 COCATS 定义的核心能力相关的心脏病理学。

结果

尽管所有 25 名研究员都达到了 COCATS 对执行和解释的超声心动图的最低推荐数量,但他们都缺乏与超声心动图核心能力相关的一种或多种心脏病理学的了解。尽管达到了执行和解释的超声心动图的最低推荐数量,但仍有 1 名或多名研究员遇到了 0 例的病理包括:缩窄性心包炎(16/25 名研究员)、主动脉夹层(15/25 名研究员)、心包填塞(4/25 名研究员)、瓣膜肿块/血栓(2/25 名研究员)、人工瓣膜功能障碍(1/25 名研究员)和心脏腔室肿块/血栓(1/25 名研究员)。

结论

完成 COCATS 二级培训中最低推荐数量的超声心动图执行和解释的心脏病学研究员经常缺乏对心脏病理学的了解,即使在大学三级转诊医院环境中也是如此。这些数据表明,除了 COCATS 定义的最低推荐超声心动图数量外,研究员培训计划还应监测每位受训研究员的病理病例数,以确保独立进行超声心动图实践的能力。

相似文献

1
Variable exposure to echocardiography core competencies when applying minimum recommended procedural numbers for cardiology fellows in training.在为受训心脏病学研究员应用最低推荐程序数量时,超声心动图核心能力的可变暴露。
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2022 Sep 20;20(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12947-022-00294-1.
2
Competency Testing for Pediatric Cardiology Fellows Learning Transthoracic Echocardiography: Implementation, Fellow Experience, and Lessons Learned.儿科心脏病学进修医师经胸超声心动图学习能力测试:实施情况、进修医师体验及经验教训
Pediatr Cardiol. 2015 Dec;36(8):1700-11. doi: 10.1007/s00246-015-1220-7. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
3
COCATS 4: Securing the Future of Cardiovascular Medicine.COCATS 4:保障心血管医学的未来。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 May 5;65(17):1907-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.03.015.
4
Core Cardiology Training Symposium (COCATS) Standards and Board Certifications: Implications for Fellows-in-Training Seeking Employment.核心心脏病学培训研讨会(COCATS)标准和委员会认证:对寻求就业的住院医师的影响。
Eval Health Prof. 2022 Dec;45(4):425-427. doi: 10.1177/01632787211020816. Epub 2021 May 25.
5
Can diagnostic and procedural skills required to practice cardiology as a specialist be mastered in 3 years?作为一名心脏病学专家,是否可以在 3 年内掌握所需的诊断和操作技能?
Can J Cardiol. 2015 Jan;31(1):91-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.10.036. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
6
On-call transthoracic echocardiographic interpretation by first year cardiology fellows: comparison with attending cardiologists.第一年心内科住院医师进行即时经胸超声心动图解读:与主治心脏病专家的比较。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jun 14;19(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1634-7.
7
Impact of telemedicine on the practice of pediatric cardiology in community hospitals.远程医疗对社区医院儿科心脏病学实践的影响。
Pediatrics. 2002 Jan;109(1):E3. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.1.e3.
8
Preliminary Interpretations of Transthoracic Echocardiograms by Cardiology Fellows.心内科住院医师对经胸超声心动图的初步解读。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017 Dec;30(12):1234-1238. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2017.07.014. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
9
The echocardiography "boot camp": a novel approach in pediatric cardiovascular imaging education.超声心动图“训练营”:儿科心血管成像教育的新方法。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013 Oct;26(10):1187-1192. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jul 13.
10
Perceived Gaps in Knowledge for the Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology Fellow: the Results of a National Needs-Assessment Survey.高级心力衰竭和心脏移植心脏病学研究员的知识差距感知:一项全国需求评估调查的结果。
J Card Fail. 2024 Mar;30(3):516-519. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.11.015. Epub 2023 Nov 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Competency-Based Medical Education: Do the Cardiac Imaging Training Guidelines Have it Right?基于能力的医学教育:心脏影像学培训指南是否正确?
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Dec;12(12):2505-2513. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.09.021.
2
Who Is a Competent Echocardiographer?谁是合格的超声心动图检查师?
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019 Aug;32(8):944-946. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2019.03.008. Epub 2019 Apr 28.
3
Imaging skills for transthoracic echocardiography in cardiology fellows: The value of motion metrics.心脏病学住院医师经胸超声心动图的成像技能:运动指标的价值。
Ann Card Anaesth. 2016 Apr-Jun;19(2):245-50. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.179595.
4
Manual Skill Acquisition During Transesophageal Echocardiography Simulator Training of Cardiology Fellows: A Kinematic Assessment.心脏病学住院医师经食管超声心动图模拟器训练期间手动技能的获得:一项运动学评估。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015 Dec;29(6):1504-10. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.05.198. Epub 2015 May 27.
5
COCATS 4 Task Force 5: Training in Echocardiography.美国心脏病学会适宜性标准(COCATS)4 工作组 5:超声心动图培训
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 May 5;65(17):1786-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.03.035. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
6
Can diagnostic and procedural skills required to practice cardiology as a specialist be mastered in 3 years?作为一名心脏病学专家,是否可以在 3 年内掌握所需的诊断和操作技能?
Can J Cardiol. 2015 Jan;31(1):91-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.10.036. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
7
Simulator training enhances resident performance in transesophageal echocardiography.模拟器培训提高了住院医师经食管超声心动图检查的水平。
Anesthesiology. 2014 Jan;120(1):149-59. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000063.
8
Effects of transesophageal echocardiography simulator training on learning and performance in cardiovascular medicine fellows.经食管超声心动图模拟器训练对心血管医学研究员学习和表现的影响。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013 Dec;26(12):1450-1456.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2013.08.008. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
9
Comparison of expert and novice performance of a simulated transesophageal echocardiography examination.模拟经食管超声心动图检查中专家与新手表现的比较。
Simul Healthc. 2013 Oct;8(5):329-34. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31829068df.
10
The impact of internet and simulation-based training on transoesophageal echocardiography learning in anaesthetic trainees: a prospective randomised study.互联网和基于模拟的培训对麻醉学员经食管超声心动图学习的影响:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Anaesthesia. 2013 Jun;68(6):621-7. doi: 10.1111/anae.12261. Epub 2013 Apr 17.