Suppr超能文献

详细说明确定过程以及解决合法“应得” DNA 的努力的结果。

Detailing the process of identifying and the outcomes of efforts to address lawfully "owed" DNA.

机构信息

Criminology Research Center, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Forensic Sci. 2022 Nov;67(6):2321-2333. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15142. Epub 2022 Sep 19.

Abstract

While missed DNA sample collection has been an identified problem for decades, there has yet to be a scholarly publication related to a large-scale effort to address lawfully "owed" DNA outside of a prison system. Lawfully owed DNA samples are DNA samples that legally should have been collected and entered into Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) based upon a qualifying offense but were not. As the first jurisdiction funded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance's Sexual Assault Kit Initiative to address lawfully owed DNA, this case study fills this knowledge gap by answering four key questions: What was the scope of the problem in this jurisdiction? What was the process by which individuals who owe were identified? What were the outcomes of these efforts? And what were the lessons learned and recommendations for other jurisdictions? Findings from this case study indicate widespread DNA sample collection issues in this jurisdiction, with nearly 15,000 identified as owing DNA over the span of approximately 7 years. Efforts to collect lawfully owed DNA samples from those who owe over a duration of approximately five and a half years have resulted in about one-fifth now being in CODIS, about 4% of these newly collected DNA profiles resulted in a forensic hit, and a quarter of those hits have resulted in a prosecution. This study serves as an important blueprint for other jurisdictions and underscores the importance of having effective policies and practices to help ensure that all who should lawfully have their DNA collected and uploaded into CODIS do.

摘要

虽然 DNA 样本采集缺失问题已经存在了几十年,但在监狱系统之外,针对合法“应采集”的 DNA 样本进行大规模处理的学术研究还很少见。所谓合法应采集的 DNA 样本是指根据犯罪行为,法律上应该采集并录入联合 DNA 索引系统(CODIS)的 DNA 样本,但实际上并未采集录入。作为第一个得到美国司法部司法援助局性侵犯检材倡议资助的司法管辖区,该案例研究通过回答四个关键问题,填补了这一知识空白:该司法管辖区的问题范围有多大?如何确定应采集者的身份?这些努力的结果如何?以及有哪些经验教训和建议可用于其他司法管辖区?该案例研究的结果表明,该司法管辖区普遍存在 DNA 样本采集问题,在大约 7 年的时间里,大约有 15000 人被确定为应采集 DNA。在大约五年半的时间里,对那些应采集者采集合法应采集的 DNA 样本的努力,使现在有大约五分之一的人被录入 CODIS,其中约 4%的新采集的 DNA 样本有法医学检测结果,四分之一的检测结果导致了起诉。这项研究为其他司法管辖区提供了重要的蓝图,并强调了制定有效政策和实践的重要性,以帮助确保所有应合法采集和上传 DNA 样本的人都能做到这一点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/165d/9826378/95d50396bb79/JFO-67-2321-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验