Dembroski T M, Costa P T
J Pers. 1987 Jun;55(2):211-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1987.tb00435.x.
Traditional and nontraditional risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD) are discussed with special attention devoted to the Type A behavior pattern (TABP). Positive and negative epidemiological evidence bearing on the risk factors status of global TABP is reviewed. Results of the review suggest that component scoring of the multidimensional global TABP in attempts to uncover "toxic" components, particularly Potential for Hostility, is a profitable research strategy. Similarly, evidence is presented that suggests merit in component scoring of hostility, also a multidimensional construct. To explicate more fully the nature of Potential for Hostility and its categories, correlations between the SI-derived ratings and ratings of established dimensions of individual differences based on the five-factor taxonomic model of personality from subsamples of the MRFIT and WCGS studies are presented. Total Potential for Hostility and especially the Style of interaction category show highly significant relations to Low Agreeableness or Antagonism. High ratings of Potential for Hostility identify individuals who can be described as uncooperative, antagonistic, rude, disagreeable, unsympathetic, callous, and the like. Implications of the evolving concept of coronary-prone behavior, as distinguished from TABP, are briefly considered.
本文讨论了冠心病(CHD)的传统和非传统风险因素,特别关注A型行为模式(TABP)。回顾了关于全球TABP风险因素状况的正面和负面流行病学证据。综述结果表明,在试图揭示“有毒”成分,特别是敌意潜能时,对多维全球TABP进行成分评分是一种有益的研究策略。同样,有证据表明,对敌意进行成分评分也有价值,敌意也是一个多维结构。为了更全面地阐明敌意潜能的性质及其类别,本文呈现了来自多重危险因素干预试验(MRFIT)和西储组群研究(WCGS)子样本的基于人格五因素分类模型的SI衍生评分与个体差异既定维度评分之间的相关性。总体敌意潜能,尤其是互动风格类别,与低宜人性或敌对性呈现出高度显著的关系。敌意潜能评分高的个体可被描述为不合作、敌对、粗鲁、不合群、冷漠、无情等。本文简要考虑了与TABP不同的冠心病易发性行为这一不断演变概念的影响。