Department of Psychiatry, Section for Cognitive Electrophysiology, Ulm University, Leimgrubenweg 12, 89075, Ulm, Germany.
Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Nov;84(8):2684-2701. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02568-2.
Recent research demonstrated that mere presentation of a task cue influences subsequent unconscious semantic priming by attentional sensitization of related processing pathways. The direction of this influence depended on task-set dominance. Dominant task sets with a compatible cue-task mapping were supposed to be rapidly suppressed, while weak task sets showed more sustainable activation. Building on this research, we manipulated cue-task compatibility as instance of task-set dominance in two experiments and tested how masked semantic priming was influenced by actually performing the cued task (induction-task trials) or by mere cue presentation (task cue-only trials). In induction-task trials, the results of earlier research were replicated; semantic priming was larger following a semantic induction task compared to a perceptual induction task. In task cue-only trials, priming effects were reversed compared to induction-task trials in both experiments. Priming was larger for a perceptual compared to a semantic task set in task cue-only trials, indicating suppression of task sets following mere cue presentation in preparation for the upcoming lexical decision task. This notion of an inhibition of task sets after mere cue presentation was further supported by switching-related costs and changes of task-set implementation throughout the experiment. The absence of a moderator role of cue-task compatibility for task cue effects on priming in the present study suggests that the precise time course of task-set activation and inhibition in response to task cues as a function of cue-task compatibility might depend on specific experimental settings.
最近的研究表明,仅仅呈现任务提示就会通过相关加工通路的注意敏化来影响随后的无意识语义启动。这种影响的方向取决于任务集的主导地位。与提示-任务映射相兼容的主导任务集应该会被迅速抑制,而较弱的任务集则表现出更持续的激活。基于这项研究,我们在两个实验中操纵了提示-任务的兼容性作为任务集主导地位的实例,并测试了掩蔽语义启动是如何受到执行提示任务(诱导任务试验)或仅仅呈现提示(仅提示任务试验)的影响。在诱导任务试验中,重复了早期研究的结果;与知觉诱导任务相比,语义诱导任务后的语义启动更大。在仅提示任务试验中,与诱导任务试验相比,两个实验中的启动效应都发生了反转。与语义任务集相比,在仅提示任务试验中,知觉任务集的启动效应更大,这表明在为即将到来的词汇判断任务做准备时,仅仅呈现提示就会抑制任务集。这种仅仅呈现提示后抑制任务集的观点还得到了与切换相关的成本和实验过程中任务集实施变化的支持。在本研究中,提示-任务兼容性对启动的提示效应没有调节作用,这表明任务集激活和抑制的精确时间进程可能取决于特定的实验设置。