Health Information and Standards Directorate, Health Information and Quality Authority, Cork, Ireland.
Catherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2023 Jan;38(1):40-52. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3573. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
Setting standards is a quality improvement mechanism and an important means for shaping the provision of health and social care services. Standards comprise statements describing a process or outcome of care. Setting standards is a global practice. It would be useful to have an understanding of the underpinning definitions of standards used internationally. Therefore, the aim of this review was to examine definitions of health and social care standards used internationally and identify similarities and differences. A targeted grey literature search of standard-setting bodies' websites and related health legislation was conducted to retrieve explicit definitions of standards. Of 15 standard-setting bodies that were searched, 12 definitions of standards were narratively synthesised. Terms that appeared in two or more of the definitions were extracted. Counts and percentages were calculated for these terms to determine magnitude of use. The commonalities among definitions included 'quality' (n = 6, 50%), 'statements' (n = 5, 42%), 'performance' (n = 5, 42%), and 'measureable' (n = 4, 33%). The less commonly used terms were 'processes' (n = 3, 25%), 'set' (n = 3, 25%), 'evidence based' (n = 2, 17%), 'outcome' (n = 2, 17%), 'safe' (n = 2, 17%), and 'guidance' (n = 2, 17%). Explicit definitions of standards were not retrieved from health legislation documents. Standard-setting bodies develop standards in the context of the health systems in which they are implemented; some are aspirational levels of quality, while others are minimum levels of quality. Researchers, standards developers and policy makers should be cognisant of this when comparing standards between countries.
制定标准是质量改进的机制,也是塑造卫生和社会保健服务提供的重要手段。标准包括描述护理过程或结果的说明。制定标准是一种全球性的实践。了解国际上使用的标准的基本定义将是有用的。因此,本研究的目的是检查国际上使用的卫生和社会保健标准的定义,并确定其相似点和不同点。对标准制定机构的网站和相关卫生立法进行了有针对性的灰色文献搜索,以检索标准的明确定义。在搜索的 15 个标准制定机构中,对 12 个标准定义进行了叙述性综合。从两个或更多定义中提取出现的术语。对这些术语进行计数和百分比计算,以确定使用的程度。定义中的共同点包括“质量”(n=6,50%)、“说明”(n=5,42%)、“绩效”(n=5,42%)和“可衡量”(n=4,33%)。使用较少的术语是“过程”(n=3,25%)、“设定”(n=3,25%)、“基于证据”(n=2,17%)、“结果”(n=2,17%)、“安全”(n=2,17%)和“指南”(n=2,17%)。健康立法文件中未检索到标准的明确定义。标准制定机构在其实施的卫生系统背景下制定标准;有些是质量的理想水平,而另一些则是质量的最低水平。研究人员、标准制定者和政策制定者在比较国家间的标准时应注意这一点。