Buring J E, Evans D A, Fiore M, Rosner B, Hennekens C H
JAMA. 1987 Aug 14;258(6):791-2.
Conflicting data have been reported regarding the association between occupation and coronary heart disease. We evaluated data on a series of 568 married men who died of coronary heart disease and an equal number of controls matched for age, sex, and neighborhood of residence. Information was collected from the wives of both cases and controls on a larger number of variables, including usual occupation, job-related and leisure-time physical activity, medical history, and life-style. Usual occupation was dichotomized into blue-collar and white-collar work according to the Edwards' classification. White-collar workers had a statistically significant 30% decreased risk of fatal coronary heart disease compared with blue-collar workers once the effects of reported coronary risk factors were considered (relative risk, 0.70; 95% confidence limits, 0.5 to 0.96). These data suggest that occupation is significantly associated with fatal coronary heart disease, and that this increased risk is not explained by a large number of known coronary risk factors. It still remains unclear, however, whether other uncontrolled variables explain the observed association.
关于职业与冠心病之间的关联,已有相互矛盾的数据报道。我们评估了一系列568名死于冠心病的已婚男性的数据,以及同等数量在年龄、性别和居住社区方面相匹配的对照者的数据。从病例组和对照组的妻子那里收集了大量变量的信息,包括通常的职业、与工作相关和休闲时间的体力活动、病史以及生活方式。根据爱德华兹分类法,通常的职业被分为蓝领工作和白领工作。一旦考虑到所报告的冠心病危险因素的影响,与蓝领工人相比,白领工人死于冠心病的风险在统计学上显著降低了30%(相对风险为0.70;95%置信区间为0.5至0.96)。这些数据表明,职业与致命性冠心病显著相关,而且这种增加的风险不能用大量已知的冠心病危险因素来解释。然而,其他未得到控制的变量是否能解释所观察到的这种关联,目前仍不清楚。