不可手术恶性肠梗阻姑息治疗评估中使用的结局测量指标的范围和适用性:系统评价。

The range and suitability of outcome measures used in the assessment of palliative treatment for inoperable malignant bowel obstruction: A systematic review.

机构信息

Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston upon Hull, UK.

Dove House Hospice, Kingston upon Hull, UK.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2022 Oct;36(9):1336-1350. doi: 10.1177/02692163221122352. Epub 2022 Sep 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Malignant bowel obstruction, a complication of certain advanced cancers, causes severe symptoms which profoundly affect quality of life. Clinical management remains complex, and outcome assessment is inconsistent.

AIM

To identify outcomes evaluating palliative treatment for inoperable malignant bowel obstruction, as part of a four-phase study developing a core outcome set.

DESIGN

The review is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA); PROSPERO (ID: CRD42019150648). Eligible studies included at least one subgroup with obstruction below the ligament of Treitz undergoing palliative treatment for inoperable malignant bowel obstruction. Study quality was not assessed because the review does not evaluate efficacy.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Database, CINAHL, PSYCinfo Caresearch, Open Grey and BASE were searched for trials and observational studies in October 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 4769 studies were screened, 290 full texts retrieved and 80 (13,898 participants) included in a narrative synthesis; 343 outcomes were extracted verbatim and pooled into 90 unique terms across six domains: physiological, nutrition, life impact, resource use, mortality and survival. Prevalent outcomes included adverse events (78% of studies), survival (54%), symptom control (39%) and mortality (31%). Key individual symptoms assessed were vomiting (41% of studies), nausea (34%) and pain (33%); 19% of studies assessed quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment focuses on survival, complications and overall symptom control. There is a need for definitions of treatment 'success' that are meaningful to patients, a more consistent approach to symptom assessment, and greater consideration of how to measure wellbeing in this population.

摘要

背景

某些晚期癌症的并发症恶性肠梗阻会导致严重的症状,严重影响生活质量。临床管理仍然很复杂,结果评估也不一致。

目的

确定评估不可切除的恶性肠梗阻姑息治疗的结局,作为制定核心结局集的四阶段研究的一部分。

设计

本综述按照系统评价和荟萃分析的 Preferred Reporting Items(PRISMA)报告;PROSPERO(ID:CRD42019150648)。合格的研究包括至少有一个在 Treitz 韧带以下的梗阻亚组,接受不可切除的恶性肠梗阻姑息治疗。由于本综述不评估疗效,因此未评估研究质量。

数据来源

2021 年 10 月,在 Medline、Embase、Cochrane 数据库、CINAHL、PSYCinfo Caresearch、Open Grey 和 BASE 中搜索了试验和观察性研究。

结果

共筛选出 4769 项研究,检索到 290 篇全文,纳入 80 项(13898 名参与者)进行叙述性综合分析;提取了 343 个结果,并在六个领域汇总成 90 个独特的术语:生理、营养、生活影响、资源利用、死亡率和生存。常见的结局包括不良事件(78%的研究)、生存(54%)、症状控制(39%)和死亡率(31%)。评估的关键个体症状包括呕吐(41%的研究)、恶心(34%)和疼痛(33%);19%的研究评估了生活质量。

结论

评估重点是生存、并发症和整体症状控制。需要定义对患者有意义的治疗“成功”,更一致的方法来评估症状,并更多地考虑如何衡量这一人群的幸福感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1c8/10150264/bc20bd1ee8cd/10.1177_02692163221122352-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索