Suppr超能文献

专科会诊对无并发症近期新发心房颤动或房扑患者急诊科复诊的影响。

Effect of specialist consultation on emergency department revisits among patients with uncomplicated recent-onset atrial fibrillation or flutter.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Center for Health Evaluation Outcomes, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

CJEM. 2022 Nov;24(7):760-769. doi: 10.1007/s43678-022-00370-5. Epub 2022 Sep 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the association between specialist consultation and risk of 30-day ED revisit in emergency department (ED) patients with recent-onset uncomplicated atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF/AFL).

METHODS

As a secondary analysis of a previously published trial, clinical experts identified predictors of consultation including age and sex, ED sinus conversion, thromboembolic risk, heart rate, rate control medication use, coronary artery disease and anti-platelet use, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. These were included in a propensity-matched hierarchical Bayesian model accounting for hospital site as a random effect, with 30-day ED revisit as the primary outcome. We also measured ED length of stay for consulted and non-consulted patients.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 11 sites for 829 ED patients with AF/AFL, of whom 364 (44%) had specialist consultation. A total of 128 patients (15.4%) had an ED revisit, 78 (16.8%) from the no consult group and 50 (13.7%) from the consult group. Consultation rates ranged from 8.8 to 71% between sites. Median length of stay was 591 min (interquartile range [IQR] 359-1024) for consulted patients and 300 min (IQR 212-409) for patients without consultation. After propensity-matching, consulted patients had a 0.6% (IQR - 4 to 3%) lower risk of 30-day revisits than non-consulted patients (probability of lower risk 55%).

CONCLUSIONS

In ED patients with uncomplicated AF/AFL, there was substantial between-site variation in specialist consultations; such consultation was unlikely to influence revisits within 30 days while ED length of stay was nearly double. ED specialist consultations may not be necessary for uncomplicated patients.

摘要

目的

探讨在近期发作的无并发症心房颤动或房扑(AF/AFL)的急诊科(ED)患者中,专科会诊与 30 天 ED 再就诊风险之间的关系。

方法

作为先前发表的一项试验的二次分析,临床专家确定了会诊的预测因素,包括年龄和性别、ED 窦性转化、血栓栓塞风险、心率、控制心率药物的使用、冠心病和抗血小板药物的使用以及慢性阻塞性肺疾病。这些因素被纳入一个倾向匹配的分层贝叶斯模型中,该模型将医院作为随机效应进行了考虑,以 30 天 ED 再就诊为主要结局。我们还测量了会诊和未会诊患者的 ED 住院时间。

结果

我们分析了来自 11 个地点的 829 例 AF/AFL 患者的数据,其中 364 例(44%)接受了专科会诊。共有 128 例(15.4%)患者 ED 再就诊,其中 78 例(16.8%)来自未会诊组,50 例(13.7%)来自会诊组。各地点的会诊率在 8.8%至 71%之间。会诊患者的中位住院时间为 591 分钟(IQR 359-1024),未会诊患者的住院时间为 300 分钟(IQR 212-409)。在进行倾向匹配后,与未会诊患者相比,会诊患者 30 天内再就诊的风险降低了 0.6%(IQR -4 至 3%)(较低风险的概率为 55%)。

结论

在无并发症 AF/AFL 的 ED 患者中,专科会诊存在明显的地点间差异;这种会诊不太可能影响 30 天内的再就诊,而 ED 住院时间几乎增加了一倍。对于无并发症的患者,ED 专科会诊可能不是必需的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验