Xu Lingping, Zhao Yixin, Duan Yichao, Wang Rui, Hou Junlong, Wang Jing, Chen Bin, Yang Ye, Xue Xianjun, Zhao Yongyong, Zhang Bo, Sun Chaofeng, Guo Fengwei
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Syncope Center, Xianyang Central Hospital, Xianyang 712000, China.
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 13;11(18):5371. doi: 10.3390/jcm11185371.
Catheter ablation of ganglionated plexi (GPs) performed as cardioneuroablation in the left atrium (LA) has been reported previously as a treatment for vasovagal syncope (VVS). However, the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in the treatment of VVS remains unclear. The objective of this study is to explore the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in the treatment of VVS and to compare the different ganglion-mapping methods for prognostic effects. A total of 108 patients with refractory VVS who underwent catheter ablation were retrospectively enrolled. Patients preferred to use high-frequency stimulation (HFS) (n = 66), and anatomic landmark (n = 42) targeting is used when HFS failed to induce a positive reaction. The efficacy of the treatment is evaluated by comparing the location and probability of the intraoperative vagal reflex, the remission rate of postoperative syncope symptoms, and the rate of negative head-up tilt (HUT) results. Adverse events are analyzed, and safety is evaluated. After follow-up for 8 (5, 15) months, both HFS mapping and anatomical ablation can effectively improve the syncope symptoms in VVS patients, and 83.7% of patients no longer experienced syncope (<0.001). Both approaches to catheter ablation in the treatment of VVS effectively inhibit the recurrence of VVS; they are safe and effective. Therefore, catheter ablation can be used as a treatment option for patients with symptomatic VVS.
先前已有报道,在左心房(LA)进行神经节丛(GPs)导管消融作为心脏神经消融术可用于治疗血管迷走性晕厥(VVS)。然而,导管消融治疗VVS的疗效和安全性仍不明确。本研究的目的是探讨导管消融治疗VVS的疗效和安全性,并比较不同神经节标测方法对预后的影响。本研究回顾性纳入了108例接受导管消融治疗的难治性VVS患者。患者更倾向于使用高频刺激(HFS)(n = 66),当HFS未能诱发阳性反应时,则采用解剖标志(n = 42)定位。通过比较术中迷走神经反射的部位和发生率、术后晕厥症状缓解率以及直立倾斜试验(HUT)阴性率来评估治疗效果。分析不良事件并评估安全性。随访8(5,15)个月后,HFS标测和解剖消融均能有效改善VVS患者的晕厥症状,83.7%的患者不再发生晕厥(<0.001)。两种导管消融方法在治疗VVS时均能有效抑制VVS复发;它们安全有效。因此,导管消融可作为有症状VVS患者的一种治疗选择。