Maloberti Alessandro, Sun Jinwei, Zannoni Jessica, Occhi Lucia, Bassi Ilaria, Fabbri Saverio, Colombo Valentina, Gualini Elena, Algeri Michela, Varrenti Marisa, Masciocco Gabriella, Perna Enrico, Oliva Fabrizio, Cipriani Manlio, Frigerio Maria, Giannattasio Cristina
Cardiology 4, Cardio Center, ASST GOM Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20159 Milan, Italy.
School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy.
Life (Basel). 2022 Aug 26;12(9):1322. doi: 10.3390/life12091322.
Endothelial dysfunction (ED) is frequently found in patients with heart failure (HF). Among several pharmacological agents reported to improve endothelial function, levosimendan seems to be a promising one, even though, to date, only two previously published studies have evaluated its effects on ED in these patients. The aim of our pilot study was to further investigate the role of periodic levosimendan infusion on endothelial function in patients affected by advanced HF. In this cross-sectional study, three different groups were enrolled: 20 patients with advanced HF treated with periodic levosimendan (LEVO), 20 patients with HF on optimal medical therapy (OMT), and 20 healthy subjects (control group). ED was evaluated through flow-mediated dilation (FMD) at the level of the brachial artery. The three groups presented similar ages with significant differences in gender distribution, systolic blood pressure, and chronic kidney disease (eGFR < 30 mL/min). In HF patients, ischaemic aetiology was more prevalent in the LEVO group than in the OMT group (60 vs. 40%, p < 0.001). The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class was worse in the LEVO group, as well as in NT-proBNP (5636.7 ± 6164.6 ng/dL and 1243.7 ± 1487.2 ng/dL, in the LEVO and OMT groups, respectively, p = 0.005). The FMD was significantly higher in the healthy control group compared to that of the OMT group (15.7 ± 6.4 vs. 9.1 ± 6.0%, p = 0.007) while it showed an intermediate value in LEVO patients (12.4 ± 7.1%) (ANOVA p = 0.010). In conclusion, levosimendan therapy seems to ameliorate endothelial dysfunction related to heart failure. Longitudinal studies in patients on periodic therapy are needed in order to confirm the long-term effects of levosimendan on ED.
内皮功能障碍(ED)在心力衰竭(HF)患者中很常见。在据报道可改善内皮功能的几种药物中,左西孟旦似乎是一种很有前景的药物,尽管迄今为止,仅有两项先前发表的研究评估了其对这些患者内皮功能障碍的影响。我们的初步研究目的是进一步探究周期性输注左西孟旦对晚期HF患者内皮功能的作用。在这项横断面研究中,招募了三个不同的组:20例接受周期性左西孟旦(LEVO)治疗的晚期HF患者、20例接受最佳药物治疗(OMT)的HF患者以及20名健康受试者(对照组)。通过肱动脉水平的血流介导的血管舒张(FMD)评估内皮功能障碍。三组年龄相似,但在性别分布、收缩压和慢性肾脏病(估算肾小球滤过率<30 mL/分钟)方面存在显著差异。在HF患者中,LEVO组的缺血性病因比OMT组更普遍(60%对40%,p<0.001)。纽约心脏协会(NYHA)功能分级在LEVO组以及N末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)方面更差(LEVO组和OMT组分别为5636.7±6164.6 ng/dL和1243.7±1487.2 ng/dL,p = 0.005)。与OMT组相比,健康对照组的FMD显著更高(15.7±6.4对9.1±6.0%,p = 0.007),而在LEVO患者中其显示为中间值(12.4±7.1%)(方差分析p = 0.010)。总之,左西孟旦治疗似乎可改善与心力衰竭相关的内皮功能障碍。需要对接受周期性治疗的患者进行纵向研究,以确认左西孟旦对内皮功能障碍的长期影响。