Suppr超能文献

持续血流左心室辅助装置不会使慢性心力衰竭患者的内皮功能恶化:一项初步研究。

Continuous flow left ventricular assist devices do not worsen endothelial function in subjects with chronic heart failure: a pilot study.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Cardiology Unit, Giovanni Paolo II Hospital, viale salerno, Policoro, Matera, Italy.

Cardiovascular Disease Section, Department of Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Oct;8(5):3587-3593. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13484. Epub 2021 Jul 31.

Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate endothelial function in subjects with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), comparing them with subjects with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction on the list for heart transplant (HT) and with HT patients with a normal systolic cardiac function to identify any differences.

METHODS

We enrolled 28 subjects with LVAD, 55 subjects with HT, and 42 subjects with heart failure on the transplant list. The subjects underwent a general physical examination, assessment of laboratory blood parameters, and assessment of endothelial function through flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of brachial artery.

RESULTS

The three groups were homogeneous as regards age, gender, smoke abuse, C-reactive protein (CRP) and FMD parameters (P = ns). In LVAD group percentage of FMD change showed an inverse correlation with CRP (rho: -0.5, P: 0.003), a well-known marker of inflammation and tissue damage.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous flow related to LVAD seems to not worsen endothelial function. Endothelial function was not affected by cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, diabetes, obesity, and tobacco habit), by the functional status expressed by New York Heart Association class, by the left ventricular systolic function and by the presence or absence of ischaemic heart disease in all the populations analysed. CRP was the only factor able to influence percentage of FMD change in patient with LVAD, reinforcing the hypothesis that inflammation is the main determinant of endothelial function.

摘要

目的

评估左心室辅助装置(LVAD)患者的血管内皮功能,并将其与因心力衰竭而接受心脏移植(HT)治疗的患者以及心脏收缩功能正常的 HT 患者进行比较,以确定其中的差异。

方法

我们共纳入 28 名 LVAD 患者、55 名 HT 患者和 42 名 HT 候补患者。所有患者均接受了一般体格检查、实验室血液参数评估以及肱动脉血流介导的舒张功能(FMD)评估。

结果

三组患者在年龄、性别、吸烟、C 反应蛋白(CRP)和 FMD 参数方面均具有同质性(P=ns)。LVAD 组的 FMD 变化百分比与 CRP 呈负相关(rho:-0.5,P:0.003),CRP 是炎症和组织损伤的一个公认标志物。

结论

LVAD 相关的持续血流似乎不会加重血管内皮功能障碍。在所有分析的人群中,内皮功能不受心血管危险因素(高血压、高胆固醇血症、糖尿病、肥胖和吸烟习惯)、纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级所代表的功能状态、左心室收缩功能以及是否存在缺血性心脏病的影响。CRP 是唯一能够影响 LVAD 患者 FMD 变化百分比的因素,这进一步支持了炎症是内皮功能的主要决定因素这一假说。

相似文献

2
Macrovascular and microvascular function after implantation of left ventricular assist devices in end-stage heart failure: Role of microparticles.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Jul;34(7):921-32. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.03.004. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
7
Gut microbiota, endotoxemia, inflammation, and oxidative stress in patients with heart failure, left ventricular assist device, and transplant.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Sep;39(9):880-890. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
8
Late right heart failure during support with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices adversely affects post-transplant outcome.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 May;34(5):667-74. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.10.005. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
9
Vascular function in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device recipients: effect of a single pulsatility treatment session.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2021 Apr 1;320(4):R425-R437. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00274.2020. Epub 2021 Jan 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Support on Coronary Artery Endothelial Function in Ischemic and Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy.
Circ Heart Fail. 2019 Aug;12(8):e006085. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006085. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
3
Expert consensus and evidence-based recommendations for the assessment of flow-mediated dilation in humans.
Eur Heart J. 2019 Aug 7;40(30):2534-2547. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz350.
4
2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension.
Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 1;39(33):3021-3104. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339.
6
Evolution of Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy for Advanced Heart Failure: A Review.
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Jul 1;3(7):650-658. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0522.
9
Continuous flow left ventricular assist devices: shared care goals of monitoring and treating patients.
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2015 Jan-Mar;11(1):33-44. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-11-1-33.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验