Suppr超能文献

一项关于腹腔镜治疗肠套叠期间意外阑尾切除术的回顾性研究。

A retrospective study about incidental appendectomy during the laparoscopic treatment of intussusception.

作者信息

Liu Tao, Wu Yibo, Xu Weijue, Liu Jiangbin, Sheng Qingfeng, Lv Zhibao

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Pediatr. 2022 Sep 6;10:966839. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.966839. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We aim to see incidental appendectomy (IA) was worth or not during the laparoscopic treatment of intussusception.

METHODS

This study included forty-eight patients who underwent a laparoscopic procedure for idiopathic intussusception without intestinal resection between April 2014 and April 2021. The Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and the Student -test for continuous variables were used to analyze and compare patient characteristics.

RESULTS

IA was performed on 63% (30/48) of patients after surgical reduction, while 18 (37%), did not. Patients who underwent IA had a higher total cost (16,618 ± 2,174 vs.14,301 ± 5,206, = 0.036), and a longer mean operation duration (59 ± 19 vs.45 ± 21, = 0.025). The distribution of the PO time, length of hospital stay, PCs, and RI did not differ significantly. The histopathological evaluation of the 30 resected appendices revealed five (17%) with signs of acute inflammation, 20 (66%) with chronic signs of inflammation, and five (17%) with inconspicuous appendices.

CONCLUSION

IA is linked to a longer average operation time and a higher total cost. There is insufficient evidence to recommend IA during laparoscopic intussusception treatment. The risks and benefits of IA need further study.

摘要

目的

我们旨在探讨在腹腔镜治疗肠套叠过程中进行阑尾切除术(IA)是否值得。

方法

本研究纳入了2014年4月至2021年4月期间48例接受腹腔镜手术治疗特发性肠套叠且未行肠切除的患者。分类变量采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验,连续变量采用Student检验来分析和比较患者特征。

结果

手术复位后,63%(30/48)的患者接受了IA,而18例(37%)未接受。接受IA的患者总费用更高(16,618±2,174 vs.14,301±5,206,P = 0.036),平均手术时间更长(59±19 vs.45±21,P = 0.025)。术后首次排气时间、住院时间、并发症和复发率的分布差异无统计学意义。对30例切除阑尾的组织病理学评估显示,5例(17%)有急性炎症迹象,20例(66%)有慢性炎症迹象,5例(17%)阑尾无明显病变。

结论

IA与更长的平均手术时间和更高的总费用相关。在腹腔镜肠套叠治疗中,尚无足够证据推荐IA。IA的风险和益处需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61be/9485678/1f438d5841e0/fped-10-966839-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
A retrospective study about incidental appendectomy during the laparoscopic treatment of intussusception.
Front Pediatr. 2022 Sep 6;10:966839. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.966839. eCollection 2022.
2
Incidental appendectomy during robotic laparoscopic prostatectomy-safe and worth to perform?
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 Mar;403(2):265-269. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1630-5. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
4
Operative treatment for intussusception: Should an incidental appendectomy be performed?
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Mar;54(3):495-499. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.099. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
5
Facilitating factors in same-day discharge after pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy.
J Surg Res. 2018 Sep;229:145-149. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.072. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
6
Incidental appendectomy: 18-year pathologic survey and cost effectiveness in the nonmanaged-care setting.
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Aug;205(2):298-306. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.02.071. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
8
Laparoscopic approach for managing intussusception in children: Analysis of 65 cases.
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Jan 21;10(3):830-839. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i3.830.
9
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis.
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2012 Sep;10(22):239-42.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical characteristics of recurrent intussusception: A single-center retrospective study.
J Pediatr Surg. 2021 Oct;56(10):1831-1834. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.03.051. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
3
Preoperative sonographic diagnosis of McSwain type V appendiceal intussusception: A case report (with video).
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 4;99(49):e23452. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023452.
4
Management of intussusception in children: A systematic review.
J Pediatr Surg. 2021 Mar;56(3):587-596. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.09.055. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
5
Not only appendicitis: rare appendix disorders manifesting as surgical emergencies in children.
Eur J Pediatr. 2021 Feb;180(2):407-413. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03784-4. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
6
Preoperative diagnosis of appendiceal intussusception.
Pediatr Int. 2020 Aug;62(8):992-993. doi: 10.1111/ped.14182. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
7
Comparison of clinical and histopathological features of patients who underwent incidental or emergency appendectomy.
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Jan 27;11(1):19-26. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v11.i1.19.
8
Operative treatment for intussusception: Should an incidental appendectomy be performed?
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Mar;54(3):495-499. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.099. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
9
Incidental appendectomy during robotic laparoscopic prostatectomy-safe and worth to perform?
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 Mar;403(2):265-269. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1630-5. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
10
Appendiceal Intussusception: A Diagnostic Challenge.
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Feb;28(1):30-33. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1604400. Epub 2017 Jul 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验