Greason K L, Rappold J F, Liberman M A
Department of General Surgery and Clinical Investigation, Naval Medical Center, 34800 Bob Wilson Drive, San Diego, CA 92134-5000, USA.
Surg Endosc. 1998 Mar;12(3):223-5. doi: 10.1007/s004649900639.
Removing the normal appendix when operating for suspected acute appendicitis is the standard of care. The use of laparoscopy should not alter this practice.
Retrospective review of 72 patients found to have grossly normal appendices while undergoing laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis. Twenty-eight patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) alone while 44 patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy with incidental laparoscopic appendectomy (ILA).
There was no difference in length of hospitalization (DL = 44 h, ILA = 43 h, p = 0.49) or morbidity (DL = 11%, ILA = 5%, p = 0.37). One patient required appendectomy 11 days after diagnostic laparoscopy for recurrent acute right lower quadrant abdominal pain. Five percent of resected appendices (2/44) demonstrated acute inflammation upon pathologic review.
Laparoscopic removal of the normal appendix produces no added morbidity or increase in length of hospitalization as compared to diagnostic laparoscopy. It demonstrates cost effectiveness by preventing missed and future appendicitis. Incidental laparoscopic appendectomy is the preferred treatment option.
在对疑似急性阑尾炎进行手术时切除正常阑尾是标准治疗方法。腹腔镜检查的应用不应改变这一做法。
回顾性分析72例在因疑似阑尾炎接受腹腔镜检查时发现阑尾外观正常的患者。28例患者仅接受诊断性腹腔镜检查(DL),44例患者接受诊断性腹腔镜检查并附带腹腔镜阑尾切除术(ILA)。
住院时间(DL = 44小时,ILA = 43小时,p = 0.49)或发病率(DL = 11%,ILA = 5%,p = 0.37)无差异。1例患者在诊断性腹腔镜检查11天后因复发性急性右下腹腹痛接受阑尾切除术。经病理检查,5%的切除阑尾(2/44)显示有急性炎症。
与诊断性腹腔镜检查相比,腹腔镜下切除正常阑尾不会增加发病率或延长住院时间。它通过预防漏诊和未来的阑尾炎显示出成本效益。附带腹腔镜阑尾切除术是首选的治疗方案。