Schrier Elizabeth, Holt Hunter K, Kuppermann Miriam, Sawaya George F
School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2022 Aug 4;3(1):709-717. doi: 10.1089/whr.2022.0007. eCollection 2022.
While annual cytology has not been recommended for many years, it remains many patients' preferred screening strategy for cervical cancer. Patient education and provider recommendations have been found effective in aligning professional society guidelines with patient preferences. We assessed whether an educational video with value elicitation exercises (utility assessments) changed screening strategy preferences among patients who had an initial preference for annual screening.
We conducted an interventional study of English- or Spanish-speaking women 21-65 years of age, recruited from two women's health clinics in San Francisco, California ( = 262). Participants were asked about their preferred method of screening before viewing a 7-minute educational video and using a computerized tool that elicited values for 23 different health states related to cervical cancer screening. Directly afterward, they were again asked about their preferred screening strategy. Multivariable regression analysis was utilized to identify independent predictors of changing preferences.
Of 246 enrollees, 62.6% (154/246) had an initial preference for annual cytology; after viewing the video and completing the values elicitation exercises, about half (72/154, 47%) preferred a strategy other than annual screening. Having attended college and being screened every 3 to 5 years in the recent past were independent predictors of changing preferences away from annual screening. In sensitivity analyses, 53.2% of average-risk participants changed preferences away from annual cytology ( < 0.01).
Viewing an educational video and conducting a series of value elicitation exercises were associated with a substantially decreased likelihood of preferring annual screening. These findings underscore the importance of patient-centered education to help support informed patient preferences.
尽管多年来一直不推荐进行年度细胞学检查,但它仍是许多患者首选的宫颈癌筛查策略。研究发现,患者教育和医生建议在使专业学会指南与患者偏好保持一致方面是有效的。我们评估了一个带有价值诱导练习(效用评估)的教育视频是否会改变最初倾向于年度筛查的患者的筛查策略偏好。
我们对年龄在21至65岁之间、讲英语或西班牙语的女性进行了一项干预性研究,这些女性是从加利福尼亚州旧金山的两家妇女健康诊所招募的(n = 262)。参与者在观看一个7分钟的教育视频并使用一个计算机化工具来引出与宫颈癌筛查相关的23种不同健康状态的价值之前,被问及他们首选的筛查方法。之后,他们再次被问及首选的筛查策略。采用多变量回归分析来确定偏好改变的独立预测因素。
在246名登记者中,62.6%(154/246)最初倾向于年度细胞学检查;在观看视频并完成价值诱导练习后,约一半(72/154,47%)的人倾向于采用年度筛查以外的策略。上过大学以及在最近过去每3至5年接受一次筛查是偏好从年度筛查转变的独立预测因素。在敏感性分析中,53.2%的平均风险参与者改变了对年度细胞学检查的偏好(P < 0.01)。
观看教育视频并进行一系列价值诱导练习与倾向于年度筛查的可能性大幅降低相关。这些发现强调了以患者为中心的教育对于帮助支持患者明智偏好的重要性。