Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Human Behavior, Ecology, and Culture, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 23;17(9):e0273407. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273407. eCollection 2022.
The life histories of organisms are expressed as rates of development, reproduction, and survival. However, individuals may experience differential outcomes for the same set of rates. Such individual stochasticity generates variance around familiar mean measures of life history traits, such as life expectancy and the reproductive number R0. By writing life cycles as Markov chains, we calculate variance and other indices of variability for longevity, lifetime reproductive output (LRO), age at offspring production, and age at maturity for 83 animal and 332 plant populations from the Comadre and Compadre matrix databases. We find that the magnitude within and variability between populations in variance indices in LRO, especially, are surprisingly high. We furthermore use principal components analysis to assess how the inclusion of variance indices of different demographic outcomes affects life history constraints. We find that these indices, to a similar or greater degree than the mean, explain the variation in life history strategies among plants and animals.
生物的生活史表现为发育、繁殖和存活的速度。然而,个体可能会对相同的速度产生不同的结果。这种个体随机性会导致熟悉的生命史特征的平均值(如预期寿命和繁殖数 R0)周围产生方差。通过将生命周期写成马尔可夫链,我们计算了来自 Comadre 和 Compadre 矩阵数据库的 83 个动物和 332 个植物种群的长寿、终生繁殖输出(LRO)、后代产生年龄和成熟年龄的方差和其他可变性指标。我们发现,LRO 中种群内和种群间方差指标的幅度和可变性都非常高。此外,我们还使用主成分分析来评估不同人口统计结果的方差指标的纳入如何影响生命史限制。我们发现,这些指数与平均值相似或更大程度上解释了动植物生命史策略之间的差异。