Suppr超能文献

美国心脏手术医院 90 天风险标准化出院时间绩效指标

Ninety-Day Risk-Standardized Home Time as a Performance Metric for Cardiac Surgery Hospitals in the United States.

机构信息

Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH (A.M., M.Y.D., A.M.G., D.J., S.K., L.S.).

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (N.K., D.J.K., E.D.P., A.P.).

出版信息

Circulation. 2022 Oct 25;146(17):1297-1309. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059496. Epub 2022 Sep 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Assessing hospital performance for cardiac surgery necessitates consistent and valid care quality metrics. The association of hospital-level risk-standardized home time for cardiac surgeries with other performance metrics such as mortality rate, readmission rate, and annual surgical volume has not been evaluated previously.

METHODS

The study included Medicare beneficiaries who underwent isolated or concomitant coronary artery bypass graft, aortic valve, or mitral valve surgery from January 1, 2013, to October 1, 2019. Hospital-level performance metrics of annual surgical volume, 90-day risk-standardized mortality rate, 90-day risk-standardized readmission rate, and 90-day risk-standardized home time were estimated starting from the day of surgery using generalized linear mixed models with a random intercept for the hospital. Correlations between the performance metrics were assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Patient-level clinical outcomes were also compared across hospital quartiles by 90-day risk-standardized home time. Last, the temporal stability of performance metrics for each hospital during the study years was also assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 919 698 patients (age 74.2±5.8 years, 32% women) were included from 1179 hospitals. Median 90-day risk-standardized home time was 71.2 days (25th-75th percentile, 66.5-75.6), 90-day risk-standardized readmission rate was 26.0% (19.5%-35.7%), and 90-day risk-standardized mortality rate was 6.0% (4.0%-8.8%). Across 90-day home time quartiles, a graded decline was observed in the rates of in-hospital, 90-day, and 1-year mortality, and 90-day and 1-year readmission. Ninety-day home time had a significant positive correlation with annual surgical volume (=0.31; <0.001) and inverse correlation with 90-day risk-standardized readmission rate (=-0.40;  <0.001) and 90-day risk-standardized mortality rate (=-0.60;  <0.001). Use of 90-day home time as a performance metric resulted in a meaningful reclassification in performance ranking of 22.8% hospitals compared with annual surgical volume, 11.6% compared with 90-day risk-standardized mortality rate, and 19.9% compared with 90-day risk-standardized readmission rate. Across the 7 years of the study period, 90-day home time demonstrated the most temporal stability of the hospital performance metrics.

CONCLUSIONS

Ninety-day risk-standardized home time is a feasible, comprehensive, patient-centered metric to assess hospital-level performance in cardiac surgery with greater temporal stability than mortality and readmission measures.

摘要

背景

评估心脏手术的医院绩效需要一致且有效的护理质量指标。此前尚未评估医院层面风险标准化出院时间与其他绩效指标(如死亡率、再入院率和年度手术量)之间的相关性。

方法

该研究纳入了 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 10 月 1 日期间接受单纯或联合冠状动脉旁路移植术、主动脉瓣或二尖瓣手术的 Medicare 受益人的数据。使用具有医院随机截距的广义线性混合模型,从手术日起估算医院层面的年度手术量、90 天风险标准化死亡率、90 天风险标准化再入院率和 90 天风险标准化出院时间等绩效指标。使用 Pearson 相关系数评估绩效指标之间的相关性。还根据 90 天风险标准化出院时间,比较了患者水平临床结局在医院四分位数之间的差异。最后,还评估了每个医院在研究期间绩效指标的时间稳定性。

结果

共有来自 1179 家医院的 919698 名患者(年龄 74.2±5.8 岁,32%为女性)纳入研究。中位 90 天风险标准化出院时间为 71.2 天(25 百分位至 75 百分位为 66.5-75.6),90 天风险标准化再入院率为 26.0%(19.5%-35.7%),90 天风险标准化死亡率为 6.0%(4.0%-8.8%)。在 90 天出院时间四分位数中,住院、90 天和 1 年死亡率以及 90 天和 1 年再入院率均呈逐渐下降趋势。90 天出院时间与年度手术量呈显著正相关(=0.31;<0.001),与 90 天风险标准化再入院率呈负相关(=-0.40;<0.001),与 90 天风险标准化死亡率呈负相关(=-0.60;<0.001)。与年度手术量相比,使用 90 天风险标准化出院时间作为绩效指标可使 22.8%的医院在绩效排名上发生显著变化,与 90 天风险标准化死亡率相比可使 11.6%的医院发生变化,与 90 天风险标准化再入院率相比可使 19.9%的医院发生变化。在研究的 7 年期间,90 天风险标准化出院时间表现出了医院绩效指标中最强的时间稳定性。

结论

90 天风险标准化出院时间是一种可行的、全面的、以患者为中心的心脏手术医院绩效评估指标,其时间稳定性优于死亡率和再入院率指标。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Remote monitoring following adult cardiac surgery: A paradigm shift?成人心脏手术后的远程监测:是一种范式转变吗?
JTCVS Open. 2023 Jul 15;15:300-310. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.07.003. eCollection 2023 Sep.

本文引用的文献

4
Assessing the concurrent validity of days alive and at home metric.评估生存天数和在家天数指标的同时效度。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Sep;70(9):2630-2637. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17506. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
5
Sequential Evolution of Quality Assessment for Aortic Valvular Heart Interventions.主动脉瓣心脏介入治疗质量评估的序贯演变
Circulation. 2021 Jul 20;144(3):195-198. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.054897. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
7
Sources of Hospital Variation in Postacute Care Spending After Cardiac Surgery.心脏手术后急性后期护理支出的医院差异来源。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Nov;13(11):e006449. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006449. Epub 2020 Nov 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验