• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

具有高危因素的新生儿听力复筛的筛查策略及时间点

Screening strategy and time points for newborn hearing re-screening with high risk factors.

作者信息

Zeng Qing-Xiang, Luo Ren-Zhong, Yan Sheng-Bao, Tang Yi-Quan, Wen Rui-Jin, Liu Wen-Long

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center Guangzhou Medical College Guangzhou China.

出版信息

World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Apr 18;8(3):257-261. doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2020.09.002. eCollection 2022 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.wjorl.2020.09.002
PMID:36159908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9479479/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare and analyze the pass rate and screening strategy of hearing rescreening for newborns with high risk factors.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of high-risk newborns who failed their initial newborn hearing screen and subsequently underwent secondary hearing tests from June 2011 to June 2018 in Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center were performed.

RESULTS

Eight hundred and sixty-eight newborns with high risk factors were included in the study. The 57-70 days (83.5%) and 71-84 days (83.4%) group had the highest pass rate compared with 42-56 days (75.8%) and < 42 days (68.3%) group. As for different screening strategies, the pass rate of OAE(otoacoustic emissions), AABR (auto auditory brainstem response) and OAE + AABR was the highest in 57-70 days group and 71-84 days group, respectively. The OAE + AABR had the lowest pass rate compared to the other two modalities. When the pass rate was compared as different risk factors, the 57-70 days and 71-84 days group also had the highest pass rate compared with 42-56 days and < 42 days group and the pass rate had no significant differences among various risk factors group.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that all the pass rate of OAE, AABR and OAE + AABR was the highest in 57-70 days group and 71-84 days group with significant difference, suggesting that the delayed screening time (>57 days) may increase the re-screening pass rate and reduce anxiety of parents, which is of great significance for clinical work.

摘要

目的

比较并分析具有高危因素的新生儿听力复筛的通过率及筛查策略。

方法

对2011年6月至2018年6月在广州市妇女儿童医疗中心初次新生儿听力筛查未通过且随后接受二次听力检测的高危新生儿进行回顾性病历审查。

结果

868例具有高危因素的新生儿纳入研究。57 - 70天组(83.5%)和71 - 84天组(83.4%)的通过率高于42 - 56天组(75.8%)和<42天组(68.3%)。对于不同的筛查策略,耳声发射(OAE)、自动听性脑干反应(AABR)以及OAE + AABR的通过率在57 - 70天组和71 - 84天组中分别最高。与其他两种方式相比,OAE + AABR的通过率最低。当按不同危险因素比较通过率时,57 - 70天组和71 - 84天组的通过率也高于42 - 56天组和<42天组,且各危险因素组之间的通过率无显著差异。

结论

我们的结果表明,OAE、AABR以及OAE + AABR的通过率在57 - 70天组和71 - 84天组中均最高,且差异有统计学意义,提示延迟筛查时间(>57天)可能会提高复筛通过率并减轻家长的焦虑,这对临床工作具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Screening strategy and time points for newborn hearing re-screening with high risk factors.具有高危因素的新生儿听力复筛的筛查策略及时间点
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Apr 18;8(3):257-261. doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2020.09.002. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Comparison of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for neonatal hearing screening in a hospital with high delivery rate.在一家分娩率高的医院中,畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)与自动听性脑干反应(AABR)用于新生儿听力筛查的比较。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 May;120:184-188. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.02.045. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
3
When should automatic Auditory Brainstem Response test be used for newborn hearing screening?新生儿听力筛查何时应使用自动听性脑干反应测试?
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2015 Jun;42(3):199-202. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2014.10.005. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
4
Determining concordance and cost impact of otoacoustic emission and automated auditory brainstem response in newborn hearing screening in a tertiary hospital.确定三级医院新生儿听力筛查中耳声发射和自动听性脑干反应的一致性及成本影响。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Jan;128:109704. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109704. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
5
Comparison of Two-Step Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and One-Step Automated Auditory Brainstem Response for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs in Remote Areas of China.中国偏远地区通用新生儿听力筛查项目中两步瞬态诱发耳声发射与一步自动听性脑干反应的比较
Front Pediatr. 2021 May 14;9:655625. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.655625. eCollection 2021.
6
[Analysis in 13 315 newborns hearing screening].
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Aug;28(15):1165-7.
7
Early detection of neonatal hearing loss by otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem response over 10 years of experience.通过耳声发射和听性脑干反应早期检测新生儿听力损失:超过10年的经验
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Dec;127:109647. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109647. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
8
Impact of technology choice on service provision for universal newborn hearing screening within a busy district hospital.技术选择对繁忙地区医院内新生儿听力普遍筛查服务提供的影响。
J Perinatol. 2000 Dec;20(8 Pt 2):S122-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200443.
9
Effect of analgesia with pethidine during labour on false positivity of newborn hearing screening test.哌替啶分娩镇痛对新生儿听力筛查试验假阳性的影响。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):6254-6259. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1910661. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
10
Comparison of currently available devices designed for newborn hearing screening using automated auditory brainstem and/or otoacoustic emission measurements.使用自动听性脑干反应和/或耳声发射测量法对目前可用的新生儿听力筛查设备进行比较。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2004 Jul;68(7):927-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2004.02.008.

引用本文的文献

1
Neonatal Hearing Rescreening in a Second-Level Hospital: Problems and Solutions.二级医院新生儿听力复筛:问题与解决办法
Audiol Res. 2023 Aug 15;13(4):655-669. doi: 10.3390/audiolres13040058.

本文引用的文献

1
Hearing Screening in the Community.社区听力筛查
J Am Acad Audiol. 2019 Feb;30(2):145-152. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17103. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
2
Maternal knowledge and attitudes to universal newborn hearing screening: Reviewing an established program.母亲对新生儿普遍听力筛查的知识与态度:回顾一项既定计划。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Feb;105:146-153. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.12.021. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
3
Delayed diagnosis of childhood deafness: the value of false negatives in the Programme for Early Detection of Neonatal Hearing Loss.儿童期耳聋的延迟诊断:新生儿听力损失早期检测项目中假阴性的价值。
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2016 Nov-Dec;67(6):324-329. doi: 10.1016/j.otorri.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
4
Otoacoustic emissions in newborn hearing screening: a systematic review of the effects of different protocols on test outcomes.新生儿听力筛查中的耳声发射:不同方案对检测结果影响的系统评价
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 May;78(5):711-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.01.021. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
5
[Investigation of risk factors for hearing impairment in premature infants].[早产儿听力损伤危险因素的调查]
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Dec;15(12):1050-3.
6
Factors influencing delayed presentation of congenitally hearing impaired children in rural India.影响印度农村先天性听力受损儿童延迟就诊的因素。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Dec;64(4):330-2. doi: 10.1007/s12070-011-0389-1. Epub 2011 Nov 27.
7
Impact of co-occurring birth defects on the timing of newborn hearing screening and diagnosis.合并出生缺陷对新生儿听力筛查及诊断时机的影响。
Am J Audiol. 2011 Dec;20(2):132-9. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0049). Epub 2011 Sep 22.
8
Quality of life in children with unilateral hearing loss: a pilot study.单侧听力损失儿童的生活质量:一项试点研究。
Am J Audiol. 2010 Jun;19(1):61-72. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2010/07-0043).
9
[Guidelines for examination of and intervention for infants and young children's hearing.].
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Nov;44(11):883-7.
10
Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs.2007年立场声明:早期听力检测与干预项目的原则和指南
Pediatrics. 2007 Oct;120(4):898-921. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2333.