Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Int J Eat Disord. 2022 Dec;55(12):1843-1852. doi: 10.1002/eat.23816. Epub 2022 Sep 25.
The relationship of dietary restraint in increasing risk for binge eating among individuals with binge-spectrum eating disorders (B-EDs) is well established. However, previous research has not yet identified whether these individuals exhibit heterogeneous profiles of dietary restraint and whether these profiles are associated with differences in eating pathology.
Individuals with B-EDs (N = 290) completed the Eating Disorder Examination. Latent profile analysis was conducted on dietary restraint frequency data, including restriction of overall amount of food consumed, avoidance of eating, desire for an empty stomach, food avoidance, and dietary rules. Identified latent profiles were compared on binge eating frequency, compensatory behaviors frequency, and ED pathology using the three-step procedure.
A four-class model of dietary restraint best fit the data. Classes significantly differed in frequency of compensatory behaviors (F[3, 286] = 31.01, p < .001), EDE Eating Concern (F[3, 286] = 14.36, p < .001), EDE Shape Concern (F[3, 286] = 7.06, p < .001), EDE Weight Concern (F[3, 286] = 6.83, p < .001), and ED Pathology (F[3, 286] = 12.86, p < .001), but did not differ in frequency of objective (F[3, 286] = 2.45, p = .06) or subjective binge episodes (F[3, 286] = 1.87, p = .14).
Individuals with B-EDs exhibit distinct profiles of dietary restraint, which are associated with frequency of compensatory behaviors and severity of ED pathology.
Individuals with binge-spectrum eating disorders have different patterns of restrictive eating symptoms. These profiles of restrictive eating behaviors are associated with differences in severity of compensatory behaviors and cognitive eating disorder symptoms, like shape and weight dissatisfaction. Understanding the relationships between profiles of restrictive eating behaviors and other eating disorder symptoms may allow for personalization of treatment and improvements in treatment efficacy.
饮食克制与暴食谱型进食障碍(B-ED)个体暴食风险增加之间的关系已得到充分证实。然而,先前的研究尚未确定这些个体是否表现出饮食克制的异质特征,以及这些特征是否与进食障碍病理的差异相关。
B-ED 个体(N=290)完成了进食障碍检查。对饮食克制频率数据(包括限制食物摄入总量、避免进食、渴望空腹、食物回避和饮食规则)进行潜在剖面分析。使用三步程序,对潜在剖面的暴食频率、补偿行为频率和 ED 病理进行比较。
饮食克制的四分类模型最适合数据。类别的补偿行为频率(F[3, 286]=31.01,p<.001)、EDE 进食关注(F[3, 286]=14.36,p<.001)、EDE 体型关注(F[3, 286]=7.06,p<.001)、EDE 体重关注(F[3, 286]=6.83,p<.001)和 ED 病理(F[3, 286]=12.86,p<.001)显著不同,但客观(F[3, 286]=2.45,p=.06)或主观暴食发作(F[3, 286]=1.87,p=.14)频率无差异。
B-ED 个体表现出不同的饮食克制特征,与补偿行为频率和 ED 病理严重程度相关。
暴食谱型进食障碍个体存在不同模式的限制进食症状。这些限制进食行为特征与补偿行为和认知进食障碍症状(如体型和体重不满)的严重程度差异相关。了解限制进食行为特征与其他进食障碍症状之间的关系,可能有助于实现治疗的个性化和提高治疗效果。