Suppr超能文献

认知行为疗法对核心进食障碍维持机制影响的荟萃分析:对治疗变化机制的启示。

Meta-analysis of the effects of cognitive-behavioral therapy on the core eating disorder maintaining mechanisms: implications for mechanisms of therapeutic change.

机构信息

a School of Psychology , Deakin University , 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood , VIC 3125 , Australia.

出版信息

Cogn Behav Ther. 2018 Mar;47(2):107-125. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2018.1427785. Epub 2018 Jan 30.

Abstract

The original and enhanced cognitive model of eating disorders proposes that cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) "works" through modifying dietary restraint and dysfunctional attitudes towards shape and weight. However, evidence supporting the validity of this model is limited. This meta-analysis examined whether CBT can effectively modify these proposed maintaining mechanisms. Randomized controlled trials that compared CBT to control conditions or non-CBT interventions, and reported dietary restraint and shape and weight concern outcomes were searched. Twenty-nine trials were included. CBT was superior to control conditions in reducing shape (g=0.53) and weight (g=0.63) concerns, and dietary restraint (g=0.36). These effects occurred across all diagnoses and treatment formats. Improvements in shape and weight concerns and restraint were also greater in CBT than non-CBT interventions (g's=0.25, 0.24, 0.31, respectively) at post-treatment and follow-up. The magnitude of improvement in binge/purge symptoms was related to the magnitude of improvement in these maintaining mechanisms. Findings demonstrate that CBT has a specific effect in targeting the eating disorder maintaining mechanisms, and offers support to the underlying cognitive model. If changes in these variables during treatment are shown to be causal mechanisms, then these findings show that CBT, relative to non-CBT interventions, is better able to modify these mechanisms.

摘要

该研究提出,原始且强化的进食障碍认知模型表明,认知行为疗法(CBT)通过改变饮食抑制和对体型及体重的不良态度,从而“起效”。然而,支持该模型有效性的证据有限。本荟萃分析旨在检验 CBT 是否可以有效地修正这些维持机制。研究人员检索了比较 CBT 与对照组或非 CBT 干预措施、并报告饮食抑制和体型及体重关注度结果的随机对照试验。共纳入 29 项试验。CBT 在降低体型(g=0.53)和体重(g=0.63)关注度以及饮食抑制(g=0.36)方面优于对照组。这些效果在所有诊断和治疗方案中均存在。在治疗后和随访时,CBT 在改善体型和体重关注度以及饮食抑制方面也优于非 CBT 干预措施(g 值分别为 0.25、0.24、0.31)。暴食/催吐症状的改善程度与这些维持机制的改善程度相关。研究结果表明,CBT 对进食障碍维持机制具有特定的作用,为潜在的认知模型提供了支持。如果在治疗期间这些变量的变化被证明是因果机制,那么这些发现表明 CBT 相对于非 CBT 干预措施更能修正这些机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验