Bazhenova Lyudmila, Kish Jonathan, Cai Beilei, Caro Nydia, Feinberg Bruce
University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, 92093, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions, 7000 Cardinal Place, 43017, Dublin, OH, USA.
Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2022;33:100637. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2022.100637. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
Treatment for recurrent or advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) has advanced in the past 5 years with immunotherapy (IO). This study sought to describe first-line (1L) aNSCLC treatment patterns and clinical outcomes.
In this retrospective, multisite cohort study, community oncologists reported data for randomly selected stage IIIB/IV, EGFR-/ALK wild-type aNSCLC patients who initiated 1L systemic therapy from 01/01/2016 to 12/31/2019. Follow-up was through November 2020. Demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, disease response, progression, and death/last follow-up date were described. Overall response rate (ORR) was calculated using tumor measurements applying RECIST v1.1 guidelines. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from 1L initiation by Kaplan-Meier method.
497 patients from 46 sites were included. The most common 1L regimens (%) were platinum-doublet chemotherapy plus IO (PDC+IO) (40.6%), PDC (29.4%), IO monotherapy (20.7%), and PDC+bevacizumab (6.2%). From 2016 to 2019, 1L PDC declined from 63% to 10%, whereas 1L PDC+IO increased from 14% to 58%. The ORRs were 64.9%, 32.9%, 60.2%, and 61.3% for 1L PDC+IO, PDC, IO monotherapy, and PDC+bevacizumab, respectively. Median 1L PFS/OS (months) was 15.6/26.5, 5.3/13.7, 17.8/not reached, 10.8/18.6, respectively, for PDC+IO, PDC, IO monotherapy, and PDC+bevacizumab. Among patients who received only 1L treatment (n = 299), 41.5% had no further therapy and were deceased.
Although the 1L treatment paradigm has recently shifted to IO-based regimens, 41.5% did not survive past 1L. Median 1L PFS did not exceed 1.5 years and median OS remained limited across all 1L treatment groups, illustrating continued unmet aNSCLC therapeutic needs.
在过去5年中,免疫疗法(IO)推动了复发性或晚期/转移性非小细胞肺癌(aNSCLC)治疗的进展。本研究旨在描述一线(1L)aNSCLC的治疗模式和临床结局。
在这项回顾性多中心队列研究中,社区肿瘤学家报告了2016年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间开始接受1L全身治疗的随机选择的IIIB/IV期、表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)/间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)野生型aNSCLC患者的数据。随访至2020年11月。描述了人口统计学、临床特征、治疗模式、疾病反应、进展以及死亡/最后随访日期。使用应用实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)v1.1指南的肿瘤测量数据计算总缓解率(ORR)。采用Kaplan-Meier方法从1L治疗开始计算无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。
纳入了来自46个地点的497例患者。最常见的1L治疗方案(%)为铂类双联化疗加IO(PDC+IO)(40.6%)、PDC(29.4%)、IO单药治疗(20.7%)和PDC+贝伐单抗(6.2%)。从2016年到2019年,1L PDC从63%降至10%,而1L PDC+IO从14%增至58%。1L PDC+IO、PDC、IO单药治疗和PDC+贝伐单抗的ORR分别为64.9%、32.9%、60.2%和61.3%。PDC+IO、PDC、IO单药治疗和PDC+贝伐单抗的1L PFS/OS中位数(月)分别为15.6/26.5、5.3/13.7、17.8/未达到、10.8/18.6。在仅接受1L治疗的患者(n = 299)中,41.5%未接受进一步治疗且已死亡。
尽管1L治疗模式最近已转向基于IO的方案,但41.5%的患者在1L治疗后未能存活。所有1L治疗组的1L PFS中位数均未超过1.5年,OS中位数仍然有限,这表明aNSCLC的治疗需求仍未得到满足。