Wijkström H, Lundh B, Tribukait B
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1987;21(2):119-23. doi: 10.3109/00365598709180305.
The usefulness of urine and bladder washings for cytological purposes and routine conditions was compared in a reevaluation of 192 specimens from urothelial tumors. To supplement the cytological interpretation by more objective means urine and bladder washings from the same tumours were analyzed by flow cytometry. The cytological reevaluation demonstrated the necessity for extensive experience in this kind of material. No real difference was noted between urine and bladder washings in the cytological interpretation but bladder washings were superior to urine in displaying aneuploidy. The results illustrate the need for a precise sampling technique and for the supportive role of flow cytometry in the management of urothelial tumors.
在对192例尿路上皮肿瘤标本的重新评估中,比较了尿液和膀胱冲洗液在细胞学检查及常规情况下的效用。为了通过更客观的方法补充细胞学解释,对来自同一肿瘤的尿液和膀胱冲洗液进行了流式细胞术分析。细胞学重新评估表明,处理这类材料需要丰富的经验。在细胞学解释方面,尿液和膀胱冲洗液之间未发现实际差异,但在显示非整倍体方面,膀胱冲洗液优于尿液。结果表明,在尿路上皮肿瘤的管理中,需要精确的采样技术以及流式细胞术的辅助作用。